The Claiborne County Board of Supervisors convened on March 3, 2025, to discuss several key agenda items, including the purchase of land for community development and updates from the sheriff's department.
The meeting began with a motion to amend the agenda to include the purchase of 4.2 acres located at the northwest corner of Bridal Lane in Port Gibson. The land, identified as PPIN 10488, was approved for purchase at a price of $27,000. Supervisor Odom made the motion, which was seconded by Supervisor Chambers. The board unanimously supported the addition, marking the start of a new community project in District 3.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Following the land purchase discussion, Sheriff Goodes addressed the board, emphasizing the importance of maintaining order during meetings. He expressed his willingness to restore order upon request from the board president, highlighting a collaborative approach to governance.
The board also reviewed the sheriff's department's monthly report and discussed the approval of a vocal budget amounting to $130,018. Supervisor Hudson moved to approve the budget, with Supervisor Odom seconding the motion. The board discussed the necessity for the board president's signature on the budget to ensure its effectiveness, clarifying procedural changes from previous years.
However, the discussion turned contentious when Supervisor Chambers raised concerns about discrepancies in the vocal grant process, expressing dissatisfaction with the lack of documentation provided when questions were asked. This prompted a heated exchange among board members regarding communication and transparency.
Despite the disagreements, the board ultimately voted to approve the vocal budget, with the motion passing amid differing opinions on the grant's management. The meeting concluded with further agenda items pending discussion.
Overall, the meeting underscored the board's commitment to community development while also revealing underlying tensions regarding grant oversight and communication among supervisors.