[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6635477,"mediaKeyId","2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89","parentId",2634111,"title","Senate clears bill restricting immigration enforcement at sensitive locations","audioSeconds",686,"startMs",667000,"endMs",1353000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89&start=667&end=1353","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89/thumbnail_667000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6635477/Maryland/Senate-clears-bill-restricting-immigration-enforcement-at-sensitive-locations","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6635477-ff35920b0180856bc174e31bbf2e4802/orig.mp4?Expires=1776090796&Signature=ji9A797ewdKRRWTuaQPpjADWgFUwYoE120B7uzpQ8SJXBsNRQYlU1qQxBTCYTk6sTFSf53XnwlmhW36181DnhCELlJpCHDQEKzcUyBNijGw06x-CMB8D2awtaLmBOxUUCofS~ueWH6ebSKYZMzkzksC5myNqYrgFHEprRI2AVG7nMTGIhQvX4NWpRJfLtIdbJm6FzlFM18I7kteXC42lImN~fEW5KUPxmq7NdwxJjLJ1mreJXmVjKm8ogM~5ASuRDnd4g7JUHWQuGt7M7H6CLVi1endAVzk7WD6sJg98-LDqC9OppmtuUsdq9LsSfbyEPe9rTM-3q0xYrdzK8hrKiA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Maryland General Assembly - Senate Sessions","date","2025-03-14T18:46:49.183Z","article","The Maryland Senate adopted three committee amendments and a favorable report on Senate Bill 828, a measure sponsored by Senator Smith that imposes limits on immigration-enforcement activity in specified sensitive locations.

Under the bill, a sensitive location is defined in the State Government Article; the bill excludes state or local correctional facilities. For immigration-enforcement purposes, state and local entities that operate sensitive locations would be required to deny access to nonpublic areas to any individual seeking entry for the purpose of enforcing federal immigration law unless the officer presents a judicial warrant issued by a federal or state court or exigent circumstances exist. The prohibition does not apply to publicly accessible common areas.

Senators questioned whether administrative detainers issued by federal agencies, such as ICE, would suffice to gain access; floor answers clarified that administrative detainers are not judicial warrants. Senators also raised public-safety concerns and asked whether the bill would hinder the federal government from enforcing detainers issued against individuals alleged to pose a danger. Sponsors and supporters responded that the bill would not prevent federal agencies from removing individuals who threaten public safety and that the provision aims to protect students and others who testified they were fearful of accessing schools and public services because of enforcement actions.

Supporters said testimony during committee hearings reported decreased school attendance in some jurisdictions because of fear of immigration enforcement; proponents said the bill is intended to reduce that chilling effect. Opponents on the floor expressed concern that some detainers relate to individuals alleged to have engaged in serious criminal behavior and asked whether the state should limit federal enforcement access to certain state facilities.

The Senate adopted the committee amendments and the amended report without objection and ordered the bill printed for third reading.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate Floor Session, 3/14/2025 #2","oneSentenceSummary","The Maryland Senate adopted committee amendments and a favorable report on Senate Bill 828, which restricts immigration-enforcement entry into nonpublic areas of designated sensitive locations without a judicial warrant or exigent circumstances.","taxTitle","SENATE, SENATE, Committees, Legislative, Maryland","taxId",15090,"location","Maryland","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6635482,"Senate advances bill to create Maryland Reparations Commission",412,148000,560000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89&start=148&end=560","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89/thumbnail_148000.jpg","/articles/6635482/Maryland/Senate-advances-bill-to-create-Maryland-Reparations-Commission","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6635482-a0b4d85c19ffeb5192e38b997fbd1aa6/orig.mp4?Expires=1776090796&Signature=lfzYBiEWjr7rNO01BVTehobpa56owue-y3FPYQe0sqWzAn0OnA5VLCWdxoOhH0NgVcjmlpR8U8XUZlJTH4PcwSWUt9mDkfn6yM6gf8ozUarSR0VQZuHVprj8GOxxq0a1zPkPdBZNU~HdcbYc8axKg9wpI527hbzh~l7xSqQg3wz88qeWwsgIsKPWP0RdsM67vRI5i3I-JGMqnEJ-NjSi-sI7dzQaSYJv2IUSsAtQuWA7NAQuLFzklnNYcNQzn7Khsqop1glcJ3P9O~y8-16mQn7X5dbBZ9Qvn9Ul-4yNu3f83Gd4VE4Lfk-khoybu6rzOCHkBQ9XEbyVeAjUo1ptmA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Maryland Senate on an unspecified date adopted committee amendments and a favorable report on Senate Bill 587, sponsored by Senator Muse, to establish a Maryland Reparations Commission charged with studying historical inequalities and recommending appropriate remedies.

The bill sets out the commission’s duties and reporting schedule. It directs the commission to examine possible forms of reparations and similar actions taken elsewhere and to prepare a preliminary report and a final report. The bill lists a range of remedies the commission should consider, including formal statements of apology; monetary compensation; property tax rebates; social-service assistance; licensing and permit fee waivers and reimbursement; down payment assistance for residential real property; business incentives; childcare assistance; debt forgiveness; and higher-education tuition payment waivers and reimbursement.

During floor discussion, the Minority Leader questioned whether the committee had evaluated the California reparations task force’s 2023 report and whether the committee’s deliberations or testimony had expressly relied on California’s findings. Senate supporters responded that reviewing what other jurisdictions have done is within the commission’s charge and that the committee’s role was to establish the commission’s structure and scope. The committee’s sponsor and floor representative said the committee reviewed the commission’s proposed composition, scope, and potential recommendations and voted the measure out of committee.

The Senate adopted the committee amendment and the amended committee report without objection and ordered the bill printed for third reading.

The legislation establishes a study commission rather than adopting specific reparations measures; any concrete proposals would come from the commission’s reports and subsequent legislative action.

Looking ahead, the bill will next appear on third reading, where further debate or additional amendments could be offered.","Senate Bill 587, sponsored by Sen. Muse, cleared committee amendments and a favorable report to establish a commission to study reparations and produce preliminary and final recommendations on possible remedies including apologies, monetary compensation and policy reforms.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6635471,"Senate adopts committee amendments on multiple bills; one bill special-ordered to evening session",1099,549000,1648000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89&start=549&end=1648","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89/thumbnail_549000.jpg","/articles/6635471/Maryland/Senate-adopts-committee-amendments-on-multiple-bills-one-bill-special-ordered-to-evening-session","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6635471-9c52bf81b03ae711a8de7ad84db7e804/orig.mp4?Expires=1776090796&Signature=jUq2Zh9JXGuJUZUBRhFK8SsPpe4loBPCzIqfcBVxwmO6NW1FGJVQxjqZ8HJeanx1p-h13qFgJNIVyZ-2ZGR6WOqFVGwWq2gNlkTXqYIQzM8FMMh4Cka3PW8OC8y3TfQOgPNjmzb65G66sipd7Id0t1fA7yJHbkZjg3q8s6pl037Rxd4~WSCF~wD9s4m8tPeWNjMbUCdeXL~WhMKo3EutA6E6sNxKQx2zwQr8NyKc07nfcO~qeX8EbdwpCKaMlKM~8bHlbOsMQakkGciRc7ekycHMy8xw26d4rtnjNPAWzEK~cDKFP2xtTklz2X~zAHZeniejC-ApWVDBfhizwjg3Ig__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Maryland Senate moved forward a set of bills by adopting committee amendments and favorable reports and ordering the measures printed for third reading. The floor recorded the following actions during the session.

- Senate Bill 215 (cannabis on-site consumption establishments and events): Committee and floor amendments were adopted to align an effective/planning date from Jan. 1, 2025, to July 1, 2025; the amendment was accepted as friendly and the bill was ordered printed for third reading.

- Senate Bill 586 (corporations and associations — Methodist Church trust requirement repeal): Two committee amendments and an amended report were adopted without objection and the bill was ordered printed for third reading.

- Senate Bill 1023 (employment discrimination and use of medical cannabis by fire, rescue and public-safety employees): Committee amendment was adopted; the sponsor moved to special order the bill to the evening session and the Senate approved placing the bill on the special order calendar for the evening session.

- Senate Bill 1026 (Maryland’s Secondary Market Stability Act of 2025 — consumer credit application and licensing): Committee amendment and amended report adopted without objection; bill ordered printed for third reading.

- Senate Bill 342 (Voting Rights Act of 2025 — counties and municipalities): Committee amendments and a sponsor amendment were adopted without objection; bill ordered printed for third reading.

- Senate Bill 555 (Public Information Act — denials pending litigation): Committee amendment and amended report adopted without objection; bill ordered printed for third reading.

For each of these measures the Senate recorded adoption of committee amendments and adoption of the amended committee report; none of these items recorded a roll-call vote in the transcript excerpt (adoptions were recorded 'without objection').

Several other bills on the calendar also had committee amendments adopted and were advanced to printing for third reading; any final votes will occur at third reading or on the scheduled evening session when applicable.","Several bills across calendars had committee amendments adopted and were ordered printed for third reading; Senate Bill 1023 was placed on special order for the evening session.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6635474,"Senate amends Baltimore County speed-monitoring bill to cap state cost recovery at 49%",93,1436000,1529000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89&start=1436&end=1529","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2634111-9ab3aa84416b087108c027fc05d35e89/thumbnail_1436000.jpg","/articles/6635474/Maryland/Senate-amends-Baltimore-County-speed-monitoring-bill-to-cap-state-cost-recovery-at-49","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6635474-a156fb5526a03e87b566882399f7e4fd/orig.mp4?Expires=1776090796&Signature=Gsf9Alvoe5XKqP-ebDK80HJTnbdKcycJdgDITFjnfJBnt9IhMj3zwbjeYFmCKr41Txv74b7Y97syxE8ajkNIwLdXaakVH7n-8Q7PsEdt3x5ZD3TlwkhhKWkAHIl5gNmeeyTFzbz-sQyZT20vTEEXDxdhMC5b0xNaEcXB5vDOTtlbWNz-fhDTmhiLgZy4Ck6JZaXmPgy9eNXgCEjerkEsEvDIjjZwW-pwdonP648kUELlEhrQxrUi4VqJDem6NH2IqboD2U95eY6WYIrjkD01PCfcV1lkoEBvkd~WHCAMZgRPdi-NIH3AKBdjr4ldVigy3auqBt46zpc49DekVn1aHg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senators accepted a sponsor amendment to Senate Bill 338 that clarifies funding language tied to speed monitoring systems on parts of Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County.

The amendment, explained on the floor by the bill sponsor, limits the portion of fines distributed to the State Highway Administration that may be used to recover the program’s implementation costs to no more than 49 percent. The sponsor said the amendment was intended to ensure a clear cap on cost recovery and that the amendment mirrors the sponsor’s intent discussed in committee. The committee and floor leaders characterized the amendment as acceptable and the committee treated it as friendly.

The amendment was adopted without objection and the bill was ordered printed for third reading.","Senate Bill 338, concerning speed monitoring systems on I-695 and I-83 in Baltimore County, was amended to clarify that no more than 49% of fines distributed to the State Highway Administration may be used to recover program implementation costs.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Senate clears bill restricting immigration enforcement at sensitive locations

Senate advances bill to create Maryland Reparations Commission

Senate adopts committee amendments on multiple bills; one bill special-ordered to evening session

Senate amends Baltimore County speed-monitoring bill to cap state cost recovery at 49%