[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6278117,"mediaKeyId","2642825-18fcc3589bcf31644aa97233f6213003","parentId",2642825,"title","Board to review procurement-card policy after audit; staff to share PSBA recommendations","audioSeconds",840,"startMs",726000,"endMs",1566000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2642825-18fcc3589bcf31644aa97233f6213003&start=726&end=1566","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2642825-18fcc3589bcf31644aa97233f6213003/thumbnail_726000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6278117/Pennsylvania/Board-to-review-procurement-card-policy-after-audit-staff-to-share-PSBA-recommendations","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6278117-2434d946c6c210dfb5334950ce12f10b/orig.mp4?Expires=1774921535&Signature=LmnCG2pTNBz-USwqMpYtS~GIGeuTsytx~08-lE3-1wn0Neg7~1wFarARBfp3hqpgTIrFTOAIY5D76tvjf3pG-CRO083~IvTaQvK3JfH5CjwAA-8ET9xQ~s9DQQmuGc1lQ1yfrXb0qeurrLBjwcT61w0zypOLJer3Zu3I~dUJODnJxzOGblTlpDlFDhA6TKqhwGgmvNTJA2S6hFOsHYltyW0NjGEc4hndDH4VVspr96V-9MC1R8yAZ9qM3YcNWc6FI2ri9xouqAJ7rfd5bK5iNqOxEms9ozlTj087BErP7xBpMn~BwG2cxCesrBsXPa-lIpKHk9bHm3JKvrb7XjXpZw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-03-13T19:05:23Z","article","At the March 12 policy meeting, the Keystone Central School District discussed Policy 6.25 (procurement cards) and its administrative regulation following a recent audit. Board member Elizabeth asked the committee to consider tightening access, prior approval procedures and reporting; staff said many of those practices are already in place and agreed to return with documentation.

Elizabeth, who reviewed other districts' policies and the Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA) guidance, proposed several measures for the committee to consider. \"Limit usage for the procurement cards unless deemed absolutely necessary,\" she said, suggesting the business manager review and approve purchases in advance when feasible. She also requested a final summary report of procurement-card spending by building and department for board evaluation and proposed that the board \"annually approve the list of employees authorized\" to use cards so the authorization does not get lost in day‑to‑day operations.

Dr. Redmond, a staff member, said the district already follows many of those practices and suggested bringing financial staff to a future meeting for a fuller briefing. \"The things that we already have in place are things that you're talking about,\" Dr. Redmond said, adding that supervisor review and signoffs occur and that prior approval is requested for non‑emergency purchases. He also agreed to confirm whether procurement cards accrue cash‑back or reward points.

The committee agreed to table formal policy changes and asked staff to resend PSBA guidance, provide examples (including Radnor and Williamsport policies that Elizabeth referenced), and have business‑office staff available for the April meeting. The board specifically noted Policy 6.25 and AR 6.25 would be reviewed in April; no policy amendment was adopted on March 12.

Outcome: Policy 6.25 and AR 6.25 were tabled for further review; staff to provide PSBA materials, Radnor examples, the current list of cardholders, and a proposed schedule for annual authorization and reporting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Mar 12, 2025 - Policy Committee Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","At the March 12 policy meeting, the Keystone Central School District discussed Policy 6.25 (procurement cards) and its administrative regulation after an audit; board members asked staff for clearer limits and reporting and asked staff to return in April with PSBA guidance and examples.","taxTitle","Keystone Central SD, School Districts, Pennsylvania","taxId",67877,"location","Pennsylvania","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6278121,"Keystone Central SD keeps student-discipline policy under review after debate over stricter penalties",1561,8000,1569000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2642825-18fcc3589bcf31644aa97233f6213003&start=8&end=1569","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2642825-18fcc3589bcf31644aa97233f6213003/thumbnail_8000.jpg","/articles/6278121/Pennsylvania/Keystone-Central-SD-keeps-student-discipline-policy-under-review-after-debate-over-stricter-penalties","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6278121-5020ab702eac212577592fa7f3eb1ed9/orig.mp4?Expires=1774921535&Signature=Hy8P4oviYEk~vOBwXT~M8hlQH126wO-IRP8oR94ge7-Niz-dfYY5HQkm~dq9qVqZx37PjNAA5exCIWGy3b2RbkidNxtyZ8Y1hf7wldNU7ddavqyvs35N6Ceksyr~Wf7~e5Wrz~~5wH8-XwHGgvD-S3u1M689hDn6HcIgPT4DxDDAB1KlNhrcTpPNW-i6aDOgmvtdl~3PMdJdsgUcN7wJnzs3eO-Jeg1d6ohXDRPVk2ZqkwFQkhEXZpid59bI~u1HNBW90IU-DWRudkuXJjAlAMXZpcKRyuyi2eKWVOA1qtbFng8BVKFXqnga1kCZ2siEdFam6F3dzgHCN59coeGkeg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At its policy meeting on March 12, the Keystone Central School District policy committee agreed to keep Policy 2.18 (student discipline) on the agenda for further review after members debated whether the district should adopt firmer penalties for student fighting.

Board members pressed for clearer, stricter consequences for students involved in physical altercations, citing community concerns about safety on buses and in hallways. One board member suggested a three‑strike rule: \"If you involved in an altercation with fighting, first time, then you get the discussion. Second time ... third time you're suspended 3 days third time you're suspended more,\" the member said. That member added: \"If a student throws a punch, except for in self defense, there needs to be strict discipline, and we need to put the hammer down on all of this that's going on.\"

Staff cautioned that state law and the district's approach require administrators to consider context. \"The 3 strike rules are broadly not very effective. It's much better to have something where the principal looks at past history,\" said Dr. Redmond, a staff member, describing the district's emphasis on progressive discipline and individual review. Dr. Redmond said administrators examine what led to an incident and the student's background before assigning punitive measures and pointed to data the district has used to track referrals and expulsions.

Board member Elizabeth, who reviewed other districts' policies, asked staff to compare Keystone Central SD's handbook and Policy 2.18 with practices in other Pennsylvania districts and high‑performing districts statewide. \"I would be curious to see ... what other school districts — I'm not just saying regional school districts. I'm talking about the top tens public school districts in Pennsylvania — how they address this,\" she said, and offered to share materials she has already gathered.

The group discussed narrower options staff could present, including clearer language for reintroduction plans and a single sentence clarifying expectations for fighting, while avoiding a rigid, automatic three‑strike scheme. Members noted ongoing conversations among building administrators about progressive discipline and said data shows a decrease in significant referrals for violent behavior.

Outcome: Committee members agreed to keep Policy 2.18 on the agenda and asked staff to research other districts' approaches and return with recommended language and implementation options at the next meeting in April. No policy changes were adopted at the March 12 meeting.

The committee said it will monitor incidents (including reports about bus behavior) and review any proposed language changes for consistency with Pennsylvania law and the district's code of conduct before taking formal action.","At a March 12 policy meeting, board members debated adding firmer penalties for student fighting to Policy 2.18 but agreed to have staff research other districts and return with options in April rather than change the policy immediately.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board to review procurement-card policy after audit; staff to share PSBA recommendations

Keystone Central SD keeps student-discipline policy under review after debate over stricter penalties