[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6278123,"mediaKeyId","2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c","parentId",2642816,"title","ARB recommends Rockcast precast base for 420 North Cassidy, flags installation and flashing details","audioSeconds",580,"startMs",5510000,"endMs",6090000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c&start=5510&end=6090","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c/thumbnail_5510000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6278123/Bexley/Franklin-County/Ohio/ARB-recommends-Rockcast-precast-base-for-420-North-Cassidy-flags-installation-and-flashing-details","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6278123-ef578cefd558cd3fdfbfb17d1249cdc0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775311049&Signature=dDWjoxJxcNaCrS~7ceCYB0EdO7S6T-UiJV1iwdzJUwa5K7QopE~8RFXJgskRk92FBEW78OVj3s9zA17KQlBsAIPjHoKf2yTzjWJLFnDDkoSIvhx92qUSTQF1B-JTwoEbZR7sBla2qQzzPNJq6zUuTDpbu16AiE~A~MlXwBS7F33krIBMUg6CK8lV4bWffB-8q29my1O0S06VWxfC02dosmZkkixSqabo6KRiJ7N-txtkpkKyyemy8wvGC9jukiPLb5kEoLA0gaVmhYR6mbvs9Knu08f2nEkjJYV5aLKt8QBtO0iecB08JO629z2GO6VipwyfqZzjK-9dJUoyfbOx4w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Bexley OH","date","2025-03-14T11:46:47Z","article","The Architecture Review Board recommended approval to the Board of Zoning and Planning for the project at 420 North Cassidy, endorsing a precast architectural concrete base (Rockcast product) as the preferred material. Board members said the lighter, large-format precast panels better fit the building’s intended base expression, but they emphasized the need for careful detailing of flashing and installation quality.

Applicant Bill Downing presented visual examples and a sample approach using a 16-by-32-inch precast panel. Staff and board members discussed trade-offs between a precast cast-stone look and a larger-format utility brick, and noted that the final appearance derives from both material selection and field craftsmanship. Board members acknowledged the precast option had been part of an earlier approval and that workmanship and flashing details should be specified so the material weathers and performs correctly over time.

Nut graf: The board’s recommendation does not change zoning authority; it advises the zoning board to permit the project using the Rockcast precast base, with the expectation that contract documents will include flashing details and workmanship requirements to maintain long-term performance.

Staff and members further noted that either option could be made to work if installed correctly, and they asked staff to include a clear specification for flashing and joint treatment in the recommendation packet.

Ending: The ARB’s recommendation will accompany the application to the Board of Zoning and Planning; staff will clarify installation and flashing details before final zoning action.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","2025-03-13 City of Bexley Architectural Review Board","oneSentenceSummary","The Architecture Review Board recommended that the Board of Zoning and Planning approve the 420 North Cassidy project with a precast Rockcast base material, while noting installation, flashing and workmanship details must be carefully specified.","taxTitle","Bexley, Franklin County, Ohio","taxId",72409,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6278128,"ARB recommends approval of 2300 Livingston project to zoning board, requests shed dormer be added",1540,3921000,5461000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c&start=3921&end=5461","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c/thumbnail_3921000.jpg","/articles/6278128/Bexley/Franklin-County/Ohio/ARB-recommends-approval-of-2300-Livingston-project-to-zoning-board-requests-shed-dormer-be-added","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6278128-2f5e5cdb5742252c8f8fe0eba2946895/orig.mp4?Expires=1775311049&Signature=nHZPcRtDLVRYlTtfqnup4upywqxW6~b2XPpGBLLGO5bddmoqtg1sKQZeoXJll4CnfsBFyhLnuIRk~jd2RgkKNG-74-w0DDrRChfpvL-OY8u4gdQ342Dc9qEa6CcCbjrajMhVOtCgbkFsDUTn6mtffKjhF8O7v3kToD-3MtuOJQ2~AGXldrJD7~91LEj6oVPHLQYQ6Fl~Nwiw9oPJfkUCZA8-PDsdQJl~3Uv6mQu7P95E0XHnya3N5d35tZ2I9oK72IyTHGq4oUDSeoNcIp0W1P2QIf2wqiIckKaaeXrt8fwdxz5lXD16shrspeEPV-dsSmE4XkdGMEbUtA9CkMH2UQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Architecture Review Board unanimously recommended that the Board of Zoning and Planning approve the proposed development at 2300 Livingston, provided a shed dormer shown in the applicant’s presentation is added back into the design. The recommendation is advisory to the Board of Zoning and Planning and will be reflected in that board’s final decision.

Applicant Bill Downing and the project team presented a revised proposal that addressed design issues raised in earlier reviews. Staff told the board the revisions responded to previous concerns about window rhythm, porch and bracket details, and the composition of the Livingston-facing façade. The applicant also provided revised porch construction details and material samples to demonstrate how the street-facing elevation would relate to the Livingston corridor plan.

Nut graf: The board found the design revisions materially improved the street presence and pedestrian scale of the project, but asked for a specific dormer treatment to be incorporated to refine the roofline and relate the three-story massing to surrounding buildings.

Board discussion highlighted the following design points: simplifying and refining brackets and overhang details; carrying a consistent window pattern into corner bays; and improving porch detailing to strengthen pedestrian scale. A resident with standing (Miss Turner) raised site-specific concerns about the parking-lot edge and fence line; the applicant and staff described a site solution to place heavier fence posts (6-by-6 posts set in concrete) at the parking edge so a vehicle would strike a post rather than a panel, effectively functioning as wooden bollards. Staff said the fence and related site details will be included in the final decision process handled by the Board of Zoning and Planning and/or the Tree and Public Garden Commission as appropriate.

The board voted to recommend approval with the shed-dormer condition and recorded a unanimous roll-call vote.

Ending: The matter now moves to the Board of Zoning and Planning for formal action, where the ARB’s recommendation and the fence/landscape conditions will be considered.","The Architecture Review Board recommended approval of the 2300 Livingston development to the Board of Zoning and Planning, with a condition that a shed dormer (as shown in the applicant's presentation) be added back into the design.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6278133,"Bexley Architecture Review Board approves four residential projects, tables five to April 10",5254,886000,6140000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c&start=886&end=6140","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2642816-4ca28a7c812b8e055bfe6034dfa7759c/thumbnail_886000.jpg","/articles/6278133/Bexley/Franklin-County/Ohio/Bexley-Architecture-Review-Board-approves-four-residential-projects-tables-five-to-April-10","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6278133-f6ec2c7e7e3856ee986b52dc26f52ca8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775311049&Signature=RwiOsQfFTsbSpzAdVa9gNEc2Bt-H3fpdKsI~dm6Q5LMwCx8ep8-BGPtvzk7bQWHA93MCJIKChbq1V57lMVBL3O6yYYL3klVJ4Ylz0ov~lfsmXJ5OVJXuwVIvwEfSLqvA~Y8QBX~kOsL0QvnvOsJFya69ggJpKfH2pw~AbR~88XNWi2q21Eaiyv3~4PbCxPaHaxVLNqPZ90Rx7S1PZW30AD9ydP7CybenoGa-563mPbYJ3UPTEQiKBWMlDD6jgb1Hw6VHuQtzXFqyWJmQQR6z~Dy9a96WcVKTQtlOr01RLQ3~baJU-hgyH1ZgLrosy4TTnCBkSvezytKpQSm54utfcw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Bexley Architecture Review Board voted unanimously to approve four residential alteration projects and signed a six-item consent agenda at its recent meeting. The board also voted to table five applications to a date certain, April 10.

The approvals included: a certificate of appropriateness for a new spa, paver patio and pergola at 680 Grandin (ARB25-4); a certificate of appropriateness to demolish a previous addition and replace it with a new addition and attached garage at 86 South Cassidy (ARB25-5), conditioned on submitting dimensioned elevations to staff; a certificate of appropriateness to enclose a front porch and add a rear mudroom at 2557 East Broad Street (ARB25-6), with conditions requiring reorientation of the rear stair, reuse of existing brackets on the rear porch, and design refinements to the front stairs; and a certificate of appropriateness for an addition at 125 North Cassingham (ARB25-7) with conditions to work with the city design consultant on insulation of the conditioned space, exterior lighting and the placement and grid pattern of windows.

The board opened the meeting by reading six consent-agenda items listed by staff and then asked whether anyone from the public wished to speak; none did. After a motion and second, the board approved the consent agenda by roll call (all three members present voting yes). The board then announced five applications would be tabled to April 10 and voted to table those items to that date.

Nut graf: The approvals allow property owners to proceed to permit stages, but several approvals include conditions requiring further design details or staff review. In each instance the board conditioned final permits on additional submittals to ensure materials, dimensions, or site transitions meet the board’s standards.

Board members clarified conditions on several approvals. For 86 South Cassidy (ARB25-5) the board required dimensioned, noted elevations (heights, slopes, materials and window specifications) be submitted to staff; if those details are not provided the project would be returned for further review. For 2557 East Broad Street (ARB25-6) the board required the rear exterior stair be reoriented, asked that the applicant preserve and reuse decorative brackets on the new rear porch, and requested the applicant present a purposeful treatment for the front stair area.

Votes at a glance:
- Consent agenda (six items): motion to approve consent agenda — outcome: approved — vote: Mister Hall (yes), Miss Jones (yes), Chairman Scott (yes).
- Tabling of five applications to April 10 (BZap25-1; ARB24-51; BZap25-2; BZap25-4; ARB25-12): motion to table to April 10 — outcome: tabled to April 10 — vote: unanimous yes.
- ARB25-4 (680 Grandin — new spa, paver patio, pergola): motion to approve certificate of appropriateness — outcome: approved and certificate issued — vote: unanimous yes. Condition: minor design changes subject to residential design consultant review.
- ARB25-5 (86 South Cassidy — demolish previous addition, new addition and attached garage): motion to approve certificate of appropriateness with condition that dimensioned noted drawings be submitted to staff — outcome: approved — vote: unanimous yes.
- ARB25-6 (2557 East Broad Street — enclose front porch, add mudroom): motion to approve with conditions to reorient rear stair, use existing brackets on new rear porch, and address front stairs in a “purposeful” way — outcome: approved — vote: unanimous yes.
- ARB25-7 (125 North Cassingham — enclosure/addition): motion to approve with conditions that applicant work with the city design consultant on insulation of the conditioned porch space, exterior lighting, exterior transition details and window patterns (placement, trim, grid) — outcome: approved — vote: unanimous yes.

Board members and staff emphasized that several approvals include specific conditions that must be completed with staff before permits are issued. Applicants were told that failure to submit required details could result in the application being returned to the board for further review.

Ending: The board completed the scheduled agenda items and moved on to old business and recommendations to the Board of Zoning and Planning.","At its meeting, the Bexley Architecture Review Board voted unanimously to approve four residential alteration projects and to table five applications to a date certain, while signing off on a six-item consent agenda.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

ARB recommends Rockcast precast base for 420 North Cassidy, flags installation and flashing details

ARB recommends approval of 2300 Livingston project to zoning board, requests shed dormer be added

Bexley Architecture Review Board approves four residential projects, tables five to April 10