Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Union representatives urge rejection of Maryland's House Bill 17 on iGaming

February 13, 2025 | Ways and Means Committee, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Union representatives urge rejection of Maryland's House Bill 17 on iGaming
Maryland's Ways and Means Committee recently convened to discuss House Bill 17, which proposes the legalization of iGaming, a move that has sparked significant concern among local casino workers and union representatives. The bill, aimed at generating additional state revenue, faces strong opposition from those who argue it could jeopardize thousands of jobs at brick-and-mortar gaming facilities.

Union representative Josh Baker, speaking on behalf of UFCW Local 27, emphasized the potential negative impact of iGaming on employment. He warned that diverting revenue to online platforms could lead to reduced foot traffic at physical casinos, ultimately threatening stable jobs that provide benefits to many Maryland residents. Baker urged the committee to consider the long-term economic consequences, stating, "The potential revenue gains from iGaming do not outweigh the significant economic and social cost this bill would impose."

Testimonies from casino employees further illustrated the stakes involved. Dominique Taylor, a worker at Ocean Downs Casino, shared her personal experience, highlighting the importance of stable employment in her community. She expressed concern that the introduction of iGaming would lead to a decline in customers, which would directly affect her job and those of her colleagues. "If you destroy some of the best jobs in our area, this is our lives, and we really do need you to hear us out," Taylor implored.

Heidi Zimmerman, a banquet server at Horseshoe Baltimore Casino, echoed these sentiments, noting that a decrease in foot traffic would result in fewer tips and reduced income for workers reliant on customer volume. "Less customers means less people to serve, which means less tips, which means less income for casino workers and less jobs," she explained.

The committee's discussions highlighted a critical crossroads for Maryland's gaming industry, balancing the potential for new revenue against the risk of significant job losses. As the committee deliberates, the voices of casino workers and their advocates underscore the need for careful consideration of the bill's broader implications on the local economy and community well-being. The outcome of this legislation could reshape the landscape of Maryland's gaming sector, with lasting effects on employment and economic stability.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI