David Douglas Education Association supports immigrant and LGBTQ rights amid budget cuts

In a recent meeting of the David Douglas School District Board, the atmosphere was charged with a mix of concern and determination as educators and union representatives addressed pressing issues affecting students and staff. The meeting, held on March 13, 2025, highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by the community, particularly in light of recent violence that has left many feeling stressed and vulnerable.

Stephanie, a representative from the David Douglas Education Association (DDEA), opened the discussion by acknowledging the hard work of educators and the emotional toll recent events have taken on families and staff. She emphasized the importance of unity and support during these trying times, thanking those who have reached out to students and families.

A significant focus of the meeting was the DDEA's recent resolutions supporting immigrant rights and LGBTQ+ rights, marking a pivotal step for the union. These resolutions reflect a commitment to fostering a safe and inclusive environment for all students and staff, a sentiment echoed by the need for the school board to enforce policies that ensure safety and acceptance within schools.

The meeting also addressed the upcoming school board elections, with six of the seven seats on the ballot. DDEA members participated in endorsement interviews with candidates, aiming to understand their perspectives on educational governance. This engagement is crucial as the district prepares for a leadership transition, with nominations for various officer positions already underway.

However, the meeting took a serious turn when Darla Black, representing the Oregon School Employees Association (OSEA), raised alarms about potential budget cuts that could eliminate instructional assistants (IAs) in third, fourth, and fifth grades. Black highlighted the critical role IAs play in providing small group instruction, particularly for students struggling with reading. She argued that cutting these positions could exacerbate existing achievement gaps, especially for students who lack additional support at home.

Black urged the board to reconsider these cuts, emphasizing that the financial savings would be minimal compared to the long-term academic consequences. She called for a reevaluation of budget priorities, advocating for the protection of resources that directly impact student success.

As the meeting concluded, the discussions underscored the urgent need for collaboration and proactive measures to ensure that all students receive the support they need to thrive. The board faces a pivotal moment, balancing budget constraints with the imperative to provide quality education in a safe and nurturing environment. The community watches closely, hopeful for decisions that prioritize the well-being and future of its students.