[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6634724,"mediaKeyId","2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206","parentId",2662441,"title","Dahan Hospitality beer‑and‑wine application noted by committee; applicant absent, committee requests standard stipulations","audioSeconds",633,"startMs",6739000,"endMs",7372000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206&start=6739&end=7372","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206/thumbnail_6739000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6634724/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Dahan-Hospitality-beerandwine-application-noted-by-committee-applicant-absent-committee-requests-standard-stipulations","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6634724-12e8382ce8a5b47816d7df90c8cc3d4c/orig.mp4?Expires=1771192372&Signature=lG2C~xYFqQByOojwkHVAJZoIZ1TK3Gk56VunnyH3NboIKSDGIx-~rKqjs5PTrVFrrLtozLWLtTMJnznf56UPkCPCC988ZfsluxzLhx-KBMg4cd8N-EPsXU9OixWqqM0wWJJkpjkl4GtrDkPspog4v9iQmoFqYKb4i0nWUjN-lXazld2yZo5iDMKhnT7YG3SrutYi4tnTwkLInz~j~Rh9FBrqeeyOqvWxXPU2v1~KpT7PkWcm2I8vMpC~1uX118a05ELYegv3LX1H1fHK2TzFhy2~8lihNhb-FrIliyb8Lm6D7RlABkEKDpuI8pmfzVbGbF59Y5eerS0hFy8RJJ7IXw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Manhattan, NY","date","2025-03-17T17:30:49.02Z","article","Dahan Hospitality asked for a beer‑and‑wine license for Cafe Arone at 112 Greenwich Ave. The applicant did not appear at the Community Board 2 Liquor Committee meeting; committee staff reviewed the application’s materials and recommended proceeding with the committee’s standard stipulations.

Why it matters: small, neighborhood cafes seeking beer/wine often raise few operational concerns, but the committee must confirm there are no operable doors or windows that would allow outside consumption and check that a restroom and Certificate of Occupancy exist for service of alcohol.

Committee findings and direction
Committee staff said the space is small (roughly 350 square feet) with restroom access shown on the plan, background music only, no French doors or outward‑opening facades listed, and proposed hours ending at 7 p.m. Committee members agreed to move the application forward with the board’s standard beer‑and‑wine stipulations and asked staff to forward the stipulation to the applicant for signature.

Ending: the committee recorded no objections; staff will send the stipulation to the applicant and record the committee’s recommendation.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Manhattan CB2 May 5, 2020 - SLA 1&2 Committee Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","A proposed small coffee shop at 112 Greenwich Ave (Dahan Hospitality / Cafe Arone) applied for a beer‑and‑wine license; the applicant did not appear but the committee reviewed the small‑footprint application and directed staff to propose the board’s standard stipulation if the applicant provides required documentation.","taxTitle","Manhattan City, New York County, New York","taxId",3586,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6634729,"Joseon/Taco Mahal ownership update; committee to accept previously agreed stipulations",149,4920000,5069000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206&start=4920&end=5069","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206/thumbnail_4920000.jpg","/articles/6634729/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/JoseonTaco-Mahal-ownership-update-committee-to-accept-previously-agreed-stipulations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6634729-ea4e76a38a629c937c2e31935efcc298/orig.mp4?Expires=1771192372&Signature=CQ~3FvCMGLh-A9uZZuMXxbjdcaxTvOpeVxEunH~dfxxkQ8iv84Jg58ayVfYQmpl9Q-gZ0tBH9Q~IajGrd6AyK0gG~3pBczsv5bsRHuZUTmnBfH1CH-o4MZnXD8N5xWKBQexvO2ro-6DEL0CRj0GehzbHosTlcmHL9R3K1nUXnnEPiqG5y9moAS0Eeu3pIcns8QQm8jgQjChHCH2mbc9ZlDqTcDSC0MctElx514nRbMWoYVaZ5-um2jgQLtLnjVNXcj33FoLcQhtXrgQLw33S8hhSTSGHFDyeDP7OxDDX9K58uhMVZGoY0bV-zG-~35d7mJxgyOtYRtFnAgNikk0CoA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A corporate/ownership change at Joseon (Taco Mahal) was presented as a routine update to the committee. Max Bookman said the restaurant’s prior license listed both the owner and her mother; after the mother’s death the daughter (Danica) will be sole owner and the change requires community‑board notice.

Why it matters: ownership changes require the committee to confirm whether prior stipulations remain appropriate. Max Bookman said the method of operation will not change and the applicant offered to re‑sign the prior stipulations on the updated ownership paperwork.

Committee response and next steps
Committee members had no substantive objections and asked the applicant to provide the existing stipulation for signature under the single owner. Committee staff agreed to circulate the stipulation to members and to place the updated document on file.

Ending: the applicant will supply the signed stipulation by email to the committee.","Attorney Max Bookman told the committee that a small ownership change triggered an SLA re‑notice for Joseon/Taco Mahal (previously a mother‑and‑daughter license); the applicant will submit the same stipulation signed under the new sole owner and the committee raised no objections.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6634733,"Committee clears Union Square Hyatt corporate change with existing stipulations to remain",62,749000,811000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206&start=749&end=811","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206/thumbnail_749000.jpg","/articles/6634733/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Committee-clears-Union-Square-Hyatt-corporate-change-with-existing-stipulations-to-remain","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6634733-0ca92e9419d097e117b7c976fb2c5b43/orig.mp4?Expires=1771192372&Signature=kAt3amvqSrPfloiIoqrQ-FPK3sPJWencjQmZFzk8nK3opiBDh24agN0c-qCuj1uhAMVltkdxl~qyFsX-2L8onD7gYKaTkQsGrs7hwuVCgmkx20KOlVCeACBgODN0WD7ter6gBaUHSCfmcpXVnSKqWmCurOlkNqeGDeYDb~zL3~sPKrqp23IuCQWiuOl13y0r5Z2xXAUEHZ0foWBuRxHMpYJ7vwOQNsLmWzY7IQIekhkQn80eZ7YoMUKBYwOezIILcvhnBebWzg7xBk4iFNwSCBBffbU~25K1KLW0OR3SsMVd18mpheysgfM68KcJLB7sToKQSY9jS5~IKV1Mr~91gg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Representatives for the Union Square hotel (Hersha Hospitality / HHLP Union Square Associates) told Community Board 2’s Liquor License Committee the pending corporate ownership change is indirect and will not alter the hotel’s operation or the hotel’s food and beverage operator.

Donald Bernstein said the corporate parent is changing but the management team, food and beverage operator and on‑site operations will remain unchanged. He told the committee the majority of new investors are institutional (public pension funds, university endowments and other institutional investors) and that the officers and directors controlling hotel operations remain the same.

Why it matters: corporate changes can trigger new community agreements or re‑authentication of existing stipulations. Committee members asked for the standard procedure — a signed copy of prior stipulations — to be re‑submitted under the new corporate name.

Committee request and outcome
Bernstein said the 2016 stipulation and MOU remain applicable; committee members asked for a signed, up‑to‑date stipulation from the new corporate entity. The representative agreed. The committee indicated it would accept the corporate change subject to the re‑execution of the stipulation documents already on file.

Ending: staff and applicant agreed the operator would forward the existing documents to the committee; no operational changes were proposed and the committee’s recommendation will reflect re‑signed stipulations.","Hersha Hospitality’s corporate restructuring of ownership for the Union Square hotel was presented as an indirect ownership change; committee members said operations and MO remain the same and asked for re‑signed stipulations previously agreed to in 2016.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6634738,"Mishka Soho withdraws outdoor seating, agrees to noise limits and closed‑facade stipulations",1189,5190000,6379000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206&start=5190&end=6379","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206/thumbnail_5190000.jpg","/articles/6634738/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Mishka-Soho-withdraws-outdoor-seating-agrees-to-noise-limits-and-closedfacade-stipulations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6634738-1c473a357586e8da8c84aea6ae86d449/orig.mp4?Expires=1771192372&Signature=XWaJqmbd2n9bR9wMgKQcVmTPaA3SJy8o-3LydrZrTiFV-Nuy-GMMcfj37GAgkGVytgSrVV3ewLRaQ3TjKVFyf1h2SJRq9V1jsDdER446zF26dGXaDMS3qC4xgdiY9I6nIzPjoT1nw9edEY2PUrHP63sWpHx5pRljBQtmbGad~BKMlQxHYgsIyxTsr5Rr9VsYgPjovyzH~6KJPNO2wHs1c41etMTjiczWuQgXiQHrnxyaoOSjlBEViQLDADhjbIxhn1Mkymaxzsw9rM5HbYkcd02MD7wPNU03jbqdWZGcyHe4cKqas3~2q7y8ek2QN~aqnOSPExINhtPiJTWEviZ-Kg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Mishka Soho’s owners presented a full on‑premises liquor application for 519 Broom St. and agreed during the Community Board 2 Liquor Committee meeting to several operational limits the committee requested.

Applicant Marina and representative Rosa told the committee the proposed restaurant would operate 9 a.m. to 1 a.m., with a total indoor seating of 34, a six‑seat stand‑up bar and a side lot the applicant initially listed for three tables and six outdoor seats. During the meeting, Marina agreed to remove the outdoor seating from the current SLA filing because the necessary building‑department approvals and a certificate of occupancy update were not in place.

Why it matters: neighbors in the building and across the street had previously complained about music and open doors when another operator used the premises. The committee emphasized noise control and strict limits on the facade and exterior openings.

Key commitments from the applicant
- Outdoor area: Marina agreed to withdraw the outdoor seating from the present application and said she would seek any necessary building permits before requesting an alteration.
- Live music: Applicant described the program as acoustic Russian jazz (mostly piano/guitar, occasional singing), limited to one or two performers; the applicant said sets would typically occur two to three days per week for roughly 30‑minute to multi‑hour brunch or early evening slots (weekday evenings roughly 5–8 p.m.; brunch sets on weekend afternoons). The applicant agreed no amplification or drums and to close doors/facade during any live music.
- Hours: the applicant accepted the committee’s clarification that closing hours mean patrons must be cleared from the premises by the listed closing time. The applicant agreed to the committee’s proposed closing hours (midnight weekdays, 1 a.m. weekends) and to follow the board’s usual stipulations regarding no dancing, background music only unless otherwise conditioned, and no operable windows or doors open during music.

Committee action and next steps
The committee asked the applicant to sign the standard stipulation and confirm the facility’s Certificate of Occupancy (or building‑department sign‑off) for the interior seating; the applicant said she would supply the stipulation and the updated paperwork. Committee members recorded no formal objection once the applicant removed the outdoor area and accepted the stipulations.

Ending: Mishka’s application will proceed with the indoor‑only configuration and the committee requested submission of the signed stipulation and updated building documentation before the SLA filing.","Owners of Mishka Soho (519 Broom St.) told the committee they will remove an outdoor seating element from this filing, limit live music to non‑amplified acoustic sets, keep doors/facade closed during performances, and accept stipulated hours and other conditions.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6634743,"Gourmet Garage proposal draws debate over supermarket bar and full liquor plan",3882,442000,4324000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206&start=442&end=4324","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2662441-94fc0a625dfdcfad420b63b404188206/thumbnail_442000.jpg","/articles/6634743/Manhattan-City/New-York-County/New-York/Gourmet-Garage-proposal-draws-debate-over-supermarket-bar-and-full-liquor-plan","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6634743-6dddcd4632d3d1f609e7a8b34e813771/orig.mp4?Expires=1771192372&Signature=VJaEwY-7Si32~jNUPjjsemT0WMkIcbx6BnCMKflAkCyZSiatc9nJwHPdzEvkn8w4sNEPDQl5AYGjOz7D1sxcuq5nktqzxTTgp2Oif4qkmg79I8MHKnO5oIHnmV-TEtuPmVFgTFbi74rKLO51we1Ee341LNGoaCBfB2F7AV5VR3naYlUnlneDGWYWWbTCYeriG5aPdf2DX1Np7IHNilo-U1zy2soUkB-ykREqouciPJyxHAPpzII9yOCDBFRDynrs4mu8FQHwKYCzyaASe-34A1XfRPhw~Wx2aUV4NKDPVN7gnMqDgkXGj2ULwJRkUQLMjo8UXIMfmHrOmN6HD7K--w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Gourmet Garage’s application for an on‑premises full liquor license at 585 Hudson St. drew prolonged questions from Community Board 2’s Liquor License Committee about how the supermarket would sell and serve alcohol and whether the proposal fits the West Village neighborhood.

The applicant, represented by attorney Max Bookman, said the owner is Village Supermarkets, which operates ShopRite and Gourmet Garage stores in the region and has recently acquired four Fairway locations in New York City. Max Bookman said the proposed store would be a two‑level supermarket with grocery sales primarily on the lower level and an upper‑level “on‑premises” food area with about five tables and roughly 30 seats, plus a 11–13 foot bar counter. “It’s a concept that they have previously done,” Bookman said of Village’s locations outside the city. He called the liquor component a small part of overall sales: Frank, an officer with the applicant, said liquor accounted for “exactly 1/2 of 1%” of the total store sales in a comparable Morristown location.

Why it matters: committee members pressed for operational details they said affect neighborhood impacts — where seating will be located, how drinks are ordered and delivered, how minors will be prevented from receiving alcohol, whether patrons will linger during the Abingdon Square farmers market, and how the supermarket will compete with nearby restaurants.

Details and committee questions
- Service model: the applicants described two ordering paths: customers could order at the bar or order via table iPads/kiosks; drinks would be delivered to tables by staff. Applicant Tom described systems used in Morristown and Stroudsburg where the iPad requires a scannable ID and credit‑card payment, and staff validate orders and deliver drinks.
- Staffing and monitoring: the applicants said the upstairs food/drink area would be staffed by up to two bartenders at any one time and a server who tends tables; the full upstairs food operation could have “roughly 15” staff on duty during busy periods. The applicant said bartenders are TIPs‑trained and the establishments use additional in‑house security training.
- Seating and floor plan: committee members repeatedly asked for an accurate, legible floor plan. Applicants described five tables between two street entrances, counters with stools along windows and a kitchen at the back right of the upper level. The application contained different seat counts in different documents; the applicants told the committee they counted about 37 seats for the upstairs area and acknowledged the SLA paperwork had varying numbers. The committee requested a clear diagram to be used in any stipulation.
- Underage sales and iPad checks: applicants said the iPad system scans IDs and requires each liquor purchase to be completed separately on the credit card (one card, one drink), a measure they said prevents patrons from ordering multiple alcoholic drinks for others without re‑validation.
- Neighborhood impact: several members — citing the Abingdon Square farmers market, nearby brunch demand and a dense cluster of restaurants — said they feared a full liquor on‑premises supermarket could draw brunch or sidewalk traffic away from existing restaurants. Others noted the grocery’s proponents view the on‑premises offering as an amenity that helps the supermarket compete with online grocery delivery services.

Committee direction and outcome
Committee members asked the applicants to provide a definitive diagram showing the proposed designated drinking/consumption area and to confirm operational safeguards (doors/windows fixed, deliveries through staff only, iPad ID scans, staff training). At the committee’s roll call discussion at the meeting’s end, members indicated they would not support a full on‑premises (OP) liquor license for this location; the committee’s final disposition, recorded in the meeting discussion, recommended consideration of beer‑and‑wine only rather than a full liquor OP license. The committee also asked that any stipulation include the exact clouded/designated area shown on the floor plan and the agreed operational limits.

What’s next: the applicant was asked to supply a clearer floor plan, a finalized seating count, and the technical details of the iPad/ID system. The committee said it would circulate a draft stipulation specifying the licensed area and the operational controls to be re‑signed by the applicant.

Ending: The committee’s discussion closed after more than an hour of questions, with board members and the applicants emphasizing continued outreach and submission of a clarified plan that the committee can condition in any recommendation to the SLA.","Owners of Village Supermarkets (operating as Gourmet Garage) told Community Board 2’s liquor committee they plan a supermarket with an upper-level on‑premises food-and-drink area including full liquor; board members pressed for details on seating, service, ID checks and impacts on nearby restaurants and Abingdon Square farmers market.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Dahan Hospitality beer‑and‑wine application noted by committee; applicant absent, committee requests standard stipulations

Joseon/Taco Mahal ownership update; committee to accept previously agreed stipulations

Committee clears Union Square Hyatt corporate change with existing stipulations to remain

Mishka Soho withdraws outdoor seating, agrees to noise limits and closed‑facade stipulations

Gourmet Garage proposal draws debate over supermarket bar and full liquor plan