Veterinarians express concerns over equine dentistry standards and liability insurance at Indiana hearing

On March 17, 2025, the Indiana Senate Agriculture Committee convened to discuss critical issues surrounding equine dentistry, particularly focusing on the practice of "floating" horse teeth. This meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding the standards of care, liability issues, and the qualifications required for those performing dental procedures on horses.

A primary concern raised during the meeting was the potential for substandard care when horses undergo dental procedures without proper veterinary oversight. One veterinarian emphasized the importance of using appropriate sedation and equipment, such as a speculum, to ensure the safety of both the horse and the handler. The veterinarian expressed fears that inadequate care could lead to serious health risks for the animals, particularly if they have underlying conditions like temporomandibular joint (TMJ) issues.

Liability emerged as another critical topic. The discussion revealed that veterinarians typically carry substantial liability insurance, often ranging from $1 million to $2 million. This coverage is essential, especially in high-stakes environments like racetracks, where the value of the horses can be significant. The veterinarian noted that if non-veterinarians were to perform dental procedures without similar liability coverage, it could complicate matters if complications arose during treatment.

The committee also explored the qualifications of individuals who might perform equine dental work if new regulations were implemented. It was suggested that those entering this field would likely already be involved in related services or operating outside legal boundaries. The conversation pointed to the necessity of ensuring that practitioners possess adequate training and understanding of equine anatomy to maintain high standards of care.

An amendment discussed during the meeting proposed certification through the International Association of Equine Dentistry, which requires over 200 hours of training. The veterinarian present supported this amendment, arguing that it would help ensure that practitioners have the necessary knowledge to provide safe and effective dental care for horses.

In conclusion, the Senate Agriculture Committee's discussions on equine dentistry underscored the importance of maintaining high standards of care and addressing liability concerns within the industry. As the committee considers potential regulations, the focus remains on ensuring the health and safety of horses while also protecting the interests of veterinarians and practitioners in the field. The next steps will likely involve further deliberation on the proposed amendments and the establishment of clear guidelines for equine dental practices in Indiana.