[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6633473,"mediaKeyId","2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d","parentId",2664382,"title","House passes measure curbing county participation in some ICE notification agreements","audioSeconds",651,"startMs",4989000,"endMs",5640000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d&start=4989&end=5640","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d/thumbnail_4989000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6633473/Maryland/House-passes-measure-curbing-county-participation-in-some-ICE-notification-agreements","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6633473-2441c0fd9daa29205591f9fa2af555df/orig.mp4?Expires=1775808274&Signature=kQsI4ZO9mgAbZ4cPr682K9shJ9RVwnXiyslbPaT4NmHOQSwSb4k3E-kFeMakyiAcgiRN8X2~lvn8rcr83HoTXahaCWm3udfLCWeN0-NIzX8Jxs8sEYXfLsqqi4k8t5tEM14VqL27uPRWIGeyPW~HmUc0Tck8BXr3FFDtQuqJyiKOO4~oKSM87xBK54MHouFVHnzPqwU4A2uXmpGhgQ-EDuzRHJRLsFzPwASzVSGn71VzGGtW92pbD2gbQnMi9y7OY1o2L1jaaA~xS8r95qy~PZT6bgbhBKNnNIgp3i4ix-8nhFJt-Aak8UEz7vHtb5H~xftWOH9hbbTVMWPCXxpMfA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Maryland General Assembly - House","date","2025-03-17T20:55:33.49Z","article","Annapolis, March 7, 2025 — The Maryland House passed a compromise measure addressing county cooperation with federal immigration authorities and the so‑called 287(g)‑style agreements.

The bill establishes a narrower set of circumstances in which a county must notify federal immigration authorities prior to release from custody, while preserving notification requirements for people convicted of violent felonies, murder, sexual offenses, certain firearm and gang offenses, and other specified serious crimes. Supporters said the measure balances public safety with the need for immigrant communities to trust local law enforcement when reporting crime or serving as victims or witnesses.

“The bill provides guidance ... regarding the circumstances in which [departments of corrections] will notify our federal immigration authorities,” the bill sponsor said on the floor. The sponsor added the bill also allows counties that choose to maintain broader agreements to continue doing so and provides a 30‑day notice period for jurisdictions to terminate existing agreements.

Opponents called the measure a “Trojan horse,” arguing it failed to cover past convictions or certain cross‑jurisdictional convictions, and warned it would reduce counties’ ability to turn over individuals with serious prior convictions to ICE. Other speakers cited national security examples and urged cooperation in cases involving terrorism or organized criminal activity; the sponsor said an amendment included cooperation where an Interpol notice exists.

The clerk announced there were 98 votes in the affirmative; House Bill 12 22 was declared passed.

Why it matters: The bill alters local law enforcement interaction with federal immigration authorities, affecting community policing and the handling of detained noncitizens across counties. Supporters said it protects trust in policing in immigrant‑heavy communities; opponents said it could let dangerous individuals remain in the community.

Discussion focused on collateral arrests (when immigration enforcement reaches non‑targets), whether the bill would increase or decrease public safety, and the scope and constitutional basis for local‑federal agreements. The floor record shows the bill passed and jurisdictions may still opt into broader cooperation on their own.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","House Floor Session, 3/17/2025 #2","oneSentenceSummary","Annapolis, March 7, 2025 — The Maryland House passed a bill narrowing circumstances in which county jails must notify federal immigration authorities, while preserving notification requirements for specified serious offenses.","taxTitle","HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative, Maryland","taxId",15055,"location","Maryland","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6633477,"House approves Maryland Second Look Act after emotional floor debate",2223,3057000,5280000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d&start=3057&end=5280","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d/thumbnail_3057000.jpg","/articles/6633477/Maryland/House-approves-Maryland-Second-Look-Act-after-emotional-floor-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6633477-c75588bce4c62fb211b61b947cc42763/orig.mp4?Expires=1775808274&Signature=nnR19RLjjCd5PGjIo~hZ7k5j6V46dO7D52BgUQVGhvRlYa7cpqmkYcBY13etNmh8yLrDIUdiUMjXvJ~7G4Xe8bJZFT5e5UkkGx9qmpZJQ5rDgL2AOKC20wPDNm0tMWR4j0QnLKw31dIAnkcmtSWw1aLroeDf8Gn~jACYF~kxc~XeIs-~x922ivLiZjtxHPWTgUMfqcUuIsCaGAwOz7f00VapmQA4fzpuCoZpMwsqYrdszxll1BVQoCSa6YLVF2GWFGABDnG7iNFtGcJwB6RUXwyjIaG0nuU2lJHTPOct64vyEWDRFWZo6Asd0G9MOuUIaA2I9R01D68cag-m0C8bWg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Annapolis, March 7, 2025 — The Maryland House passed House Bill 853, commonly referred to as the Maryland Second Look Act, after more than an hour of floor debate that ranged from personal testimonials to arguments about victims’ rights and racial disparities in sentencing.

Under the bill as presented on the floor, people who were ages 18–25 at the time of their conviction may petition for a second judicial review of their sentence after serving a minimum period (floor discussion repeatedly described a 20‑year threshold). Supporters said the bill does not grant automatic release but instead creates a process for a judge to review rehabilitation and other factors; they cited examples of individuals who reformed in custody and later contributed to communities.

“This bill gives people the opportunity to make a petition to get a second look at their case,” the Delegate from Baltimore City said in support, describing a constituent who was released after a court review and subsequently built a career helping incarcerated people.

Opponents said the bill would allow early review for people convicted of the most violent crimes, including child murders and mass killings, and expressed concern about victims’ families. The Minority Leader and other members urged carving out categories of offenses and limiting the scope; the Minority Whip and other opponents said the bill, as enacted, would allow some severe offenders to seek release after the statutory minimum.

The House also heard testimony on racial disparities and the claim that Maryland sentences have disproportionately affected Black and Latino residents; a proponent said second look was a tool for justice review in light of that data.

Several members recounted personal or professional experiences — including a pledge by a delegate who promised to provide reentry support for anyone released under a second look — and others described victims’ enduring losses.

The clerk announced there were 89 votes in the affirmative, and House Bill 853 was declared passed.

Why it matters: The bill affects sentencing review procedures and implicates questions of public safety, rehabilitation policy and racial disparities in the criminal legal system. It establishes a formal avenue for judges to re‑examine long sentences after a set period.

The House did not adopt all proposed narrowing amendments on the floor; floor speakers said some amendments to limit eligibility were discussed but not accepted. The bill proceeds to the next legislative steps after passage in the House.","The House passed House Bill 853, creating a process for certain incarcerated people to petition for a “second look” at their sentences after a minimum period. Floor debate split on public safety, redemption and racial disparities in sentencing.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6633482,"Maryland House passes 10‑day landlord reclamation measure after floor debate",718,815000,1533000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d&start=815&end=1533","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d/thumbnail_815000.jpg","/articles/6633482/Maryland/Maryland-House-passes-10day-landlord-reclamation-measure-after-floor-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6633482-03e4de68261b521745369b59be38c049/orig.mp4?Expires=1775808274&Signature=D7Lg1KOb5s12i5IdEbGk4jA2WKT99dtKyoI~U3GSMq8HjoymRRzBMPt9IJRWWQVs1NmOgdnlvkuKYT1wLRSi8yr-2Gd8q09MK5e4UUVQuNEWtHsRD5S6xXLo40ZY8WraWSjCh~3gJHMtvudqxJAfB3s2~a0Hf10TXsolCc6XLT-Jlb8y5Xmlpqsq3VZiona2~CKeu6KkH4Yd2kzxBkuXhUCAq3hqeYalPOXVimJNkV~xjy7ShgQgHUUieXIQB14WIJBaMkUp2OIGkA~v2JtfYrcCihc6XZoWfs-L3wRJoBpxkQzF~cPZou1Z9AHfElCS5tCxaSZ9GmrilPdHXdEVXg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Annapolis, March 7, 2025 — The Maryland House approved House Bill 767 on third reading after floor debate that focused on a 10‑day reclamation period landlords must provide for possessions left after eviction.

The bill requires landlords, after eviction and a judgment of possession, to hold a tenant’s personal property for an additional 10 days. Supporters described the legislation as restoring dignity — keeping a child’s toys, family photos and personal items from being dumped on the street. “It would mean that [children] would not have to deal with the indignity of their Elmo dolls and their teddy bears ... ending up on the side of the road,” the floor leader said.

Opponents, including a delegate identifying himself as the gentleman from Southern Maryland, said the bill would create impractical obligations for landlords. He described instances in which landlords faced difficulty retrieving personal property, cited scenarios where the sheriff’s timing affects landlord access, and said small, individual landlords could be disproportionately burdened. “The landlord can do nothing ... they’ve had someone in there ... they got a judgment of possession, and they got to wait another 2 months to schedule a time for the sheriff to come out,” the opponent said.

Members also debated whether the bill goes beyond the narrow court decisions that prompted the change and whether it diverged from practices in other states. The bill’s sponsor and supporters said other states have protections and that the bill addresses harms documented in a recent lawsuit and constituent stories, such as veterans or widows who lost irreplaceable items.

The clerk reported there were 93 votes in the affirmative; House Bill 767, having received the constitutional majority, was declared passed.

Why it matters: The measure changes landlord‑tenant procedures statewide and could affect how small property owners manage evictions and storage of personal property, while supporters framed it as limiting public shaming and loss of irreplaceable items.

Discussion on the floor highlighted practical logistics (sheriff timing and liability), different stakeholder impacts (small landlords vs. displaced tenants), and the degree to which the bill aligns with or diverges from practices elsewhere. No implementation timetable was specified on the floor; the bill was declared passed and proceeds in the legislative process.","The House approved House Bill 767 to require landlords to hold evicted tenants' personal property for 10 days after eviction; supporters framed it as dignity for tenants and children, opponents warned of practical burdens on small landlords and possible unintended consequences.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6633487,"Maryland House rejects amendment limiting Transportation Trust Fund transfer to WMATA",666,152000,818000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d&start=152&end=818","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d/thumbnail_152000.jpg","/articles/6633487/Maryland/Maryland-House-rejects-amendment-limiting-Transportation-Trust-Fund-transfer-to-WMATA","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6633487-6568c3eb663fbe23506600ac33919cb5/orig.mp4?Expires=1775808274&Signature=TMUy0PnW5OjsOIRKM0zb7NjyS9sEil20Em9vtKOYfSZ8YbMN6-VULSeQsgvs6cpGGmKswfdhYTHejcNz4vyj~5R3RpiKzuzfiht90eDA6datOW2Dtre0hURBsMyudsc5t~n5KeRsOUNCYZ3WQCEqLh46s4hHHP0gGWekc~V3M9vX~IvFRV8xVjU40F~DEWPIsgmv5VzOOoAcgdfFiPugaC9ZKUlHeQKrxtIZ5rDMPmef75OaS0LO-evTjA4KR0lb7~JwilKRTszoaF6DngESVY~mY~qogABtR6cm5xNAimL7V7DvXV7iitf0kqkA7uoexTG0kVGeGWGWRZQP2j58nw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Annapolis, March 7, 2025 — The Maryland House of Representatives rejected an amendment intended to limit new annual transfers from the state Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) to the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA).

The amendment, offered from the floor as Amendment 48302 O/1, would have prohibited the additional roughly $50 million annual transfers to WMATA unless TTF revenues increased by at least 2% from fiscal 2026 levels. “If our TTF revenues remain flat, we’re not gonna steal money from every other objective of the TTF for more money for WMATA,” the Member who offered the amendment said on the floor. The amendment failed on a roll call; the clerk announced there were 98 votes in the negative.

Supporters of the amendment argued the change would prevent diverting funds from other TTF priorities, such as roads, bus lines, and infrastructure in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Western Maryland and other jurisdictions. One supporter summarized the proposal as a “guardrail” that would allow additional WMATA funding only if overall TTF revenues rose.

Opponents said the amendment was unnecessary and could undermine the stability that dedicated funding provides WMATA. The floor leader noted that flexibility already existed in past years to fund WMATA from sources other than the TTF and that predictable, dedicated funding helps WMATA access bond markets. “One of the most important things ... is provide stability for the future so that WMATA can bond the money,” the floor leader said, adding that WMATA carries millions of annual rides by Marylanders and relies on subsidized funding from multiple jurisdictions.

The amendment’s sponsor disputed assertions that the proposal would cut WMATA out of funding entirely, saying it would simply prevent diverting existing TTF dollars if revenues did not increase. After the vote, the underlying bill remained on track; the House ordered the measure printed for third reading.

Why it matters: WMATA operates across Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia and carries tens of millions of rides annually. How Maryland structures its contributions affects local transportation projects and budget priorities across the state.

Discussion points on the floor included: the size of the TTF transfer (described repeatedly as “50‑some million dollars”), whether WMATA could become self‑sufficient, whether TTF dollars have been and should be flexibly used, and whether a revenue trigger was an appropriate constraint.

No formal follow‑up direction to staff was recorded on the floor related to the amendment; the amendment failed and the bill proceeded to the next step in the legislative process.","An amendment that would have blocked new annual transfers from the Transportation Trust Fund to WMATA unless TTF revenue rose by 2% failed on a roll call in the Maryland House of Representatives. Supporters said the change would protect local road and bus funding; opponents said it could undermine long‑term WMATA financing.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6633468,"Votes at a glance: Maryland House actions March 7, 2025",4372,793000,5165000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d&start=793&end=5165","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2664382-9b43a59bc18d2a609790df8d8edbed7d/thumbnail_793000.jpg","/articles/6633468/Maryland/Votes-at-a-glance-Maryland-House-actions-March-7-2025","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6633468-633d7c77ce2efab8490c88dd5d70d88a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775808274&Signature=i8EMKKkn0ntkKW4xFnSCjYNhzsdunCOBanOujqi83p4QC3bBFaN8gCwLAQ3O14XtNfducRqSBD1pIbXuhIV2K1jKtgOUNGSCzXtihyWIMzfjhu7NMqvI6Zn3Yd54Y0ZmgV9~WUehjwTq5tDp90a0k-cGbcevh75jv6T-cCTrIU6MDZwEzKLlOWNNhDDfCBmeBw30imV84nGdE~4kzHC52uKulRtRCO8pusDwrvxJi7Ax8PrENtFvyNC0osXnWz7keGikOCB~vldIgs9gRzzsoXaehU~JOdrJy-lvvcTi0IllytXjIB-rgslXgj2H5AfyLvuOFjVU8FID~2rULmFDEQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Annapolis, March 7, 2025 — The Maryland House recorded final votes or took final action on many bills during its March 7 session. The list below summarizes bill numbers, short titles (as read on the floor), and outcomes recorded by the clerk during the session. Where the clerk announced roll call tallies on the floor, those numbers are included; where a count was not spoken in the transcript excerpt, the tally is listed as “not specified.”

Votes and outcomes recorded on the floor (selected list drawn from the calendar read on March 7, 2025):

- House Bill 767 — Real property: landlord and tenant procedures for failure to pay rent (reclamation process) — Passed (93 yes recorded)
- House Bill 781 — Election law: polling place procedures; accessibility and expedited voting act — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1283 — Charles County off‑highway recreational vehicles regulation and enforcement — Passed (128 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1310 — Prescription drug repository program, out‑of‑state pharmacies — Passed (130 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1355 — Health insurance: required coverage for hearing aids — Passed (136 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1427 — Zero‑emission electric vehicle infrastructure council revisions — Passed (vote count not specified)
- House Bill 226 — Anne Arundel County public schools: school schedule options — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 371 — Prince George’s County speed monitoring systems (MD Route 5) — Passed (102 yes recorded)
- House Bill 577 — Business regulation: study of miscellaneous state business licenses — Passed (102 yes recorded)
- House Bill 747 — Environment: on‑site wastewater systems inspection and pumping services; sunset and implementation extensions — Passed (100 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1155 — Department of the Environment: definition of ecological restoration — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1236 — Queen Anne’s County municipalities speed limits — Passed (139 yes recorded)
- House Bill 3032 — Consumer protection: elder fraud prevention (electronic funds transfers) — Passed (112 yes recorded)
- House Bill 762 — Maryland Higher Education Commission: higher education goals revisions — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1106 — Business regulation: travel services special fund fees and surety requirement — Passed (113 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1124 — Dorchester County well and sewage privatization program — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1266 — Task force to study Prince George’s County land use issues — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1367 — Lead testing and inspections: penalty for falsifying information — Passed (133 yes recorded)
- House Bill 500 — Procurement Reform Act of 2025 — Passed (125 yes recorded)
- House Bill 769 — Real property: residential foreclosures commencement restrictions — Passed (139 yes recorded)
- House Bill 838 — Health occupations: licensed direct‑entry midwives revisions — Passed (134 yes recorded)
- House Bill 850 — Workgroup on public works contracts data dashboard — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 861 — Transportation network companies: weekly fare and earnings summary reporting — Passed (102 yes recorded)
- House Bill 691 — Tax relief for service members — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 744 — Motor vehicles: reckless/negligent driving (Sergeant Patrick Kapt Act) — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1007 — Disability and life insurance medical/genetic testing protections — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1151 — Residential real property sales: appraisals — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1419 — Electric distribution system: support services and energy storage/data use — Passed (100 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1480 — Child advocacy centers: continuity of care standards — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 7191 — Holocaust education assistance grant program (committee report adopted with amendment) — Committee favored and bill ordered printed for third reading
- House Bill 1391 — Education: artificial intelligence guidance, professional development (committee amendments adopted) — Committee favored and bill ordered printed for third reading
- House Bill 853 — Maryland Second Look Act — Passed (89 yes recorded)
- House Bill 830 — Health insurance: genetic testing and cancer imaging coverage — Passed (135 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1208 — Public health: prohibited ingredients in food — Passed (133 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1222 — Public safety: immigration enforcement / Maryland Values Act — Passed (98 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1292 — Health insurance provider directory updates — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1325 — Substitute childcare provider pool pilot program — Passed (132 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1351 — Health insurance panels: credentialing for behavioral health professionals — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1265 — Education reportable offenses and prohibited behavior on school grounds reforms — Passed (128 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1375 — Portable variable messaging signs authorization — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1473 — Equal access to public services for limited English proficiency and disabilities — Passed (109 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1474 — Telehealth access for professional counselors for higher‑ed students — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1481 — Disability services adapted vehicle access pilot — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1555 — Funeral establishment/crematory oversight — Passed (132 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1478 — Director of home health care providers report — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1499 — State procurement: contract modification — Passed (136 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1516 — Maryland secondary market stability (financial institutions) — Passed (99 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1544 — Law enforcement medal and memorial tribute — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1547 — Cosmetologist licensure/domestic violence training — Passed (128 yes recorded)
- House Bill 772 — Career counseling for middle and high school students — Passed (136 yes recorded)
- House Bill 808 — Columbia Association lease requirements — Passed (138 yes recorded)
- House Bill 859 — Access to health insurance for childcare professionals outreach — Passed (109 yes recorded)
- House Bill 889 — Striped bass juvenile survey (fisheries) — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1001 — Designation of state cocktail (Maryland Orange Crush) — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1004 — Alzheimer's prevalence and treatment reporting — Passed (128 yes recorded)
- House Bill 15 — Maryland limited worker cooperative association act — Passed (102 yes recorded)
- House Bill 19 — Nursing loan repayment/education/sunset extension — Passed (137 yes recorded)
- House Bill 267 — Veterans claims servicers prohibitions and requirements — Passed (123 yes recorded)
- House Bill 303 — Regulation of community association managers (licensing) — Passed (101 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1021 — Real estate appraisers licensure — Passed (135 yes recorded)
- House Bill 1087 — Health insurance step therapy reforms for metastatic cancer — Passed (135 yes recorded)

Notes: This list was compiled from the House transcript of March 7, 2025 and records the outcomes the clerk announced on the floor where available. Some floor announcements and counts were brief or not captured fully in the transcript excerpt; those tallies are marked \"not specified.\" For bill texts, committee amendments and final enactment text, consult the official enrolled bills and the General Assembly docket.

If you want a downloadable table of every bill with full roll‑call lists, I can compile the clerk’s roll call details into a CSV.","Summary of bills and final outcomes recorded during the Maryland House session on March 7, 2025, including roll call tallies when reported on the floor.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

House passes measure curbing county participation in some ICE notification agreements

House approves Maryland Second Look Act after emotional floor debate

Maryland House passes 10‑day landlord reclamation measure after floor debate

Maryland House rejects amendment limiting Transportation Trust Fund transfer to WMATA

Votes at a glance: Maryland House actions March 7, 2025