Nevada mandates lung cancer screening in new health care provisions
March 17, 2025 | Senate Bills - Introduced, Senate Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Nevada Legislation Bills, Nevada
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
On March 17, 2025, the Nevada State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 387, a significant piece of legislation aimed at enhancing healthcare coverage for lung cancer screening. The bill seeks to amend existing regulations governing managed care organizations and health maintenance organizations, primarily focusing on preventive health measures.
One of the key provisions of SB387 mandates that managed care organizations offering health care plans must include coverage for one annual lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography for insured individuals aged 50 to 80 who meet specific smoking history criteria. This includes those who currently smoke or have quit within the last 15 years and have a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years. The bill also allows for additional screening or diagnostic services based on the results of the initial screening, ensuring that patients receive comprehensive care.
Importantly, the legislation stipulates that no deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance will be required for these screenings, making access to this critical preventive measure more affordable for patients. The provisions of the bill will take effect for health care plans delivered or renewed on or after January 1, 2026.
The introduction of SB387 has sparked discussions among lawmakers and healthcare advocates regarding its potential impact on public health. Proponents argue that the bill addresses a crucial gap in lung cancer prevention, particularly for high-risk populations, and could lead to earlier detection and better outcomes. However, some opposition has emerged, with concerns about the financial implications for managed care organizations and the potential strain on healthcare resources.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, experts suggest that its passage could signify a broader commitment to preventive healthcare in Nevada, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts in other states. The outcome of SB387 will be closely monitored, as it may set a precedent for future health policy initiatives aimed at improving access to essential medical services.
One of the key provisions of SB387 mandates that managed care organizations offering health care plans must include coverage for one annual lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography for insured individuals aged 50 to 80 who meet specific smoking history criteria. This includes those who currently smoke or have quit within the last 15 years and have a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years. The bill also allows for additional screening or diagnostic services based on the results of the initial screening, ensuring that patients receive comprehensive care.
Importantly, the legislation stipulates that no deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance will be required for these screenings, making access to this critical preventive measure more affordable for patients. The provisions of the bill will take effect for health care plans delivered or renewed on or after January 1, 2026.
The introduction of SB387 has sparked discussions among lawmakers and healthcare advocates regarding its potential impact on public health. Proponents argue that the bill addresses a crucial gap in lung cancer prevention, particularly for high-risk populations, and could lead to earlier detection and better outcomes. However, some opposition has emerged, with concerns about the financial implications for managed care organizations and the potential strain on healthcare resources.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, experts suggest that its passage could signify a broader commitment to preventive healthcare in Nevada, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts in other states. The outcome of SB387 will be closely monitored, as it may set a precedent for future health policy initiatives aimed at improving access to essential medical services.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill