[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86,98,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6125438,"mediaKeyId","2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9","parentId",2677123,"title","County staff to inspect used van option for mobile command vehicle; no purchase authorized","audioSeconds",134,"startMs",1833000,"endMs",1967000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9&start=1833&end=1967","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9/thumbnail_1833000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6125438/Miller-County/Georgia/County-staff-to-inspect-used-van-option-for-mobile-command-vehicle-no-purchase-authorized","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125438-0bb2a748d0358e446aee1c316376f440/orig.mp4?Expires=1775435688&Signature=WKTz8dQThrhQNhwQFQ5It0OgRjajBXJIwEI-GceVJYML7TLVsSZqQ0waDhQJucaoHuVeDN4JkVSB08uXukPW11DKcMduSJwwHUQ5oGKJAbuDJegDu5OZ2AptVUJqmA1tjDDOC9GWN83TRxVmKD5y~t1ECKq8Eh-XEt-apItdvn5lqqqZ3gqE7PiIvtElm0X~MLFW0rOPl0~8xNRuxFLNvjWMFmq30p8t1yiFDVtPBMa8cPJEbaa9-RtZcl0KoN9kr~j08NQhsmAHAd7I0DtYOtsPBztQ-QtyxS86alnvMhKgU0AUcAlbEnhUJJfmjZ0IJaebARB9aZgKmYGDnM3jRg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-03-19T00:45:59.437Z","article","County staff reported on options to secure a mobile command vehicle and said they will inspect a used prisoner-transport van being offered for about $26,000 before recommending purchase.

Staff said the original vehicle they had sought cost about $450,000. They found an alternative used van (a prisoner transport van) offered for $26,000 that could be stripped and refitted as a mobile command unit. Staff described potential retrofit work—adding a generator, lights and interior counters—and said the vehicle appeared to be well maintained with about 69,000 miles. Staff noted the county could explore sponsorships or partners to offset retrofit costs.

Commissioners did not authorize an immediate purchase. Instead they directed staff to go inspect the vehicle and report findings back to the board before any procurement action.

Why it matters: acquiring a mobile command unit affects emergency-response capacity and budget; staff will report retrofit cost estimates back to the board for a future funding decision.

Next steps: staff will visit the vendor next week to inspect the van and provide cost and retrofit estimates at a later meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Miller County Board of Commissioners - 03/10/2025","oneSentenceSummary","Staff presented options to acquire a mobile command vehicle, including a used prisoner-transport van offered at about $26,000; commissioners asked staff to inspect the vehicle before any purchase decision.","taxTitle","Miller County, Georgia","taxId",73614,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6125442,"Commissioners approve contracting directly with local 911 phone vendor after billing concerns with intermediary",130,1674000,1804000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9&start=1674&end=1804","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9/thumbnail_1674000.jpg","/articles/6125442/Miller-County/Georgia/Commissioners-approve-contracting-directly-with-local-911-phone-vendor-after-billing-concerns-with-intermediary","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125442-c6be9a3174c94a1a5f748c0dbad12b38/orig.mp4?Expires=1775435688&Signature=kC-q0cJbcVyfKSib5H8jLi20LCElUzLdW2xbgs2aI0UAAGU50DeI6yo58WZ0TdsY7JXXgxlrDzhS2tzAs3DK20Qig0z8-gSwONxqFONa7NMy5I7WU5IxUWVlDUwSB9~J6ZJju3uPOBtMS6iDTqXoWhVl2cWJAQoJ6Sv0cyn~YW4KoeylykxMT7HruXHlSjULriCVFevYpXeStoWcjvfxmia3cfYueeI1osLuLmdhcX~MwU9CJIdE-MB1YpFJj2oA2jJEfFZhiLOiV-ivK8XlR8F~PnpV9RpCW1v8mdU2~MOSIyojJQ88uxUI9VCQ7n5FEpkxVnK0IQ1GD3HZCDZC1Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners approved moving to a direct, year-to-year contract with the county’s 911 phone vendor after staff said an intermediary was charging the county more than the vendor billed that intermediary.

Staff reported that the county’s 911 vendor (referred to in the transcript as “West Veil,” with speakers also using variants such as “West Hill,” “Westel,” and “Westdale”) had split from the intermediary after a sale to a company called Resilient (also referred to as Resilience). Staff said the intermediary was billing the county for the vendor’s maintenance but was not passing the full amount on to the vendor. A county staff member said he verified that the intermediary’s bill exceeded the vendor’s charge.

Because West Veil (vendor) was described as working well for the county and because staff have an established working relationship with the vendor’s IT/accounting contacts, the board voted to contract directly with that vendor and to eliminate the intermediary from the billing arrangement. A commissioner said he was not interested in moving to Resilient’s phone plan and preferred to “leave the middle man out.” The motion passed after a second and a voice vote in favor.

Why it matters: contracting directly with the vendor is intended to simplify billing, prevent perceived overcharging by an intermediary and keep a system that staff say is user-friendly for county operations.

Next steps: staff will execute the year-to-year contract with the vendor identified in the meeting and adjust billing to pay the vendor directly.","Following staff reports that an intermediary billed the county more than the vendor charged, commissioners approved a direct, year-to-year contract with the 911 phone provider identified in the meeting (transcript references used multiple spellings).",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6125446,"Commissioners decline to reimburse tire damage from Bushcare Road incident",105,1560000,1665000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9&start=1560&end=1665","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9/thumbnail_1560000.jpg","/articles/6125446/Miller-County/Georgia/Commissioners-decline-to-reimburse-tire-damage-from-Bushcare-Road-incident","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125446-27a35cc0ba326990e9453cd05255f2b7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775435688&Signature=mMEGDftGsAj9jS0OrJR5w7s9muZkR4pqY2xrOP0hLCajsV2Y68D7NOmAQAaEaGshGLdpHIeKR6C1GHfJoNNBwIvMFhVkWzjpABMOWV2YLj8Ki~QJ20PGsIU0rvnKVGlM8b0tk2yxv28prF~x1YNO5x2K15NlnN~HCc2~W8pL8ubWx6-ETCf~0k1Av3m9kVwkANsNWITzBee0iZ8~Swto1G0LmRuXCL09ppRsg-OGAcsR7OZ9V-8cEEwfusgDKE0gEzj9IqzF57YinUbsLOsnddHdJ2QLa5nPFaAlrhZoDhUaAz-s99Mn9mIf9zZ0mylbZihp0dW1JWgtXgwuNi2DKQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Miller County commissioners decided not to reimburse a resident for tire damage reportedly caused by conditions on Bushcare Road.

County staff described the road as repaired in the drivable area and said the markings and issues were on the shoulder. Staff explained that Decatur County’s practice (cited as an example) is to reimburse damages only when an issue has been reported and not fixed; in that scenario the county would pay if a vehicle was damaged after the county had been notified and the hazard remained. A staff member said the county has not historically paid for tires under comparable circumstances and warned that starting such payments could set a precedent.

After discussion a motion was made not to pay reimbursement to the claimant. The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.

Why it matters: The decision reflects the county’s reluctance to establish a discretionary reimbursement policy for vehicle damage caused by roadway conditions unless a prior report and failure to fix the hazard can be demonstrated.

Next steps: No repayment will be issued; staff will continue to respond to reported roadway hazards under existing procedures.","After reviewing policy and precedent, commissioners voted not to approve payment for a resident's tire damage allegedly caused by road conditions on Bushcare Road.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6125451,"Commissioners debate posting full meeting packets online; motion to publish packet with minutes fails for lack of second",234,1324000,1558000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9&start=1324&end=1558","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9/thumbnail_1324000.jpg","/articles/6125451/Miller-County/Georgia/Commissioners-debate-posting-full-meeting-packets-online-motion-to-publish-packet-with-minutes-fails-for-lack-of-second","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125451-028b57ea5e2cb7b6c7d9e8d01d432f04/orig.mp4?Expires=1775435688&Signature=XL6EW7bdsmK1GpoG29cKCuepfgX1uf1MCGAA3OhOtEzOS6~x~SgAbE2j9wDesHU6JWup8xZkuki7AKWXMf3KTl3t6ZLQpewyffIoRJGPTkvX56Y9CYxaOZEeBUBICqHReTnA3WVqHcEBvkOEbpT-ShWhl7iWYXx~-V7xR5KAFvIlYKGdsc3OYiGwcezBZObWy8MJ8dAtWnvDM83PnOWeu1lygcUOkFivvzCZeMhUou3CiWnL4up88LzKDy9txvFR6ub38ubbWFPUcbi0k4h0gLURtcokpnPT8TRu2RU4Ry2giTqu06H3ckpS083lnyqa5BPeuXv-qCWHoV8wABO1hA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners discussed whether to post the full commissioner packet online as part of the minutes but did not adopt the change after a motion lacked a second.

One commissioner proposed making the packet available with the minutes after redacting personal data. The proposer argued the change would add an “another layer of transparency” and said the packet is already subject to open-record requests. County staff noted that documents containing personal data would need redaction before posting.

During debate a commissioner asked about the additional workload for staff; staff responded that scanning and redaction would increase time spent preparing the materials but said redaction could be handled prior to posting. The motion to adopt the practice of posting the packet with the minutes was made and no second was recorded; the board left the current practice unchanged.

Why it matters: posting meeting packets routinely could increase transparency for residents by providing the materials commissioners use when making decisions; commissioners weighed the benefit against staff workload and privacy redaction obligations.

Next steps: the county clerk will continue to provide packets via the current open-records process; commissioners did not direct staff to change the posting practice.","A proposal to make commissioners' agenda packets part of the public minutes was introduced; the board discussed redaction and workload concerns and the motion failed for lack of a second.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6125455,"Commissioners begin process to close portion of road running through private property at 88 Jernigan Road",471,827000,1298000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9&start=827&end=1298","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2677123-912fa68439532646f09b72ece95d3dd9/thumbnail_827000.jpg","/articles/6125455/Miller-County/Georgia/Commissioners-begin-process-to-close-portion-of-road-running-through-private-property-at-88-Jernigan-Road","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125455-6c2033044520fc0a2c2444d3048df0e7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775435688&Signature=Lkc4CTSqGdI-~lnmS39t9vfEuC-AC6Esa0Sj52HMAzt34bwBrJ7blXvO2qtAknzF39QUYliRxsJktrUJhikIex6yBAjWO7RD3pfsXns3iBHmSivNCv69CIBCgcsuJ4naT4g0UcrI9nTyasovHnEY9NK9wFSlk6lKfV9Io~kfYQpNZ-LFae5rkk3NVTOXg84JJB0cmvEL6BgGvmNxWG5hwK0Zqn5BensLlZflC-~WfcHTqgRsYspCOf8yRHExMbG06i4K4kVvoDINuXosneb91YNcplWNmq97AuPl3SXcXC2pZnyd2PMZSWL0glxCcyaCw6YMx5iYngKD4NLu5TvCdg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Miller County commissioners voted to begin the formal process to close a portion of a road that runs through private property at 88 Jernigan Road after residents asked the board to restrict through traffic.

The request, made by a resident who identified himself as Robert, asked the county to close the stretch of road that crosses his property between a tree line and a curve. Robert told commissioners the driveway portion is “pea gravel” and “a tube rut driveway,” that the segment has not been maintained for years and that children and four-wheelers use the area, creating a safety concern. “That's what we're requesting to do is to close it at where the property lines are,” Robert said.

County staff and commissioners discussed the procedural next steps. A staff member, Andy, said the closure will require public notice and a hearing; Andy indicated the notice likely must be advertised in the newspaper. “I think you gotta put it in the paper,” Andy said. Commissioners said the advertisement would run for a period (speakers referenced a two-week run) before a public hearing; depending on scheduling the hearing may fall in April or May.

After discussion a commissioner moved to proceed with the necessary steps to close the road from the tree line to the curve indicated on the map. The motion received a second and the board approved moving forward; staff will coordinate the legal advertisement and public hearing and will notify the resident when the timetable is set.

Why it matters: closing the segment would shift maintenance responsibility and access patterns for nearby property owners and could limit through access on the county’s roadway network. The board’s action starts a statutory/local administrative process that includes public notice and a hearing before any final closure.

Next steps: staff will prepare the public notice, schedule the hearing according to the county’s required run period, and report back to the board.","Miller County commissioners approved starting formal steps to close a section of a county road/driveway that runs through private property at 88 Jernigan Road; a public notice and hearing will be required before final action.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

County staff to inspect used van option for mobile command vehicle; no purchase authorized

Commissioners approve contracting directly with local 911 phone vendor after billing concerns with intermediary

Commissioners decline to reimburse tire damage from Bushcare Road incident

Commissioners debate posting full meeting packets online; motion to publish packet with minutes fails for lack of second

Commissioners begin process to close portion of road running through private property at 88 Jernigan Road