[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6125668,"mediaKeyId","2676431-a0d92441c528c514b54d4d76b855e19e","parentId",2676431,"title","Board approves rezoning and preliminary plat for Bull Mountain area after lengthy public hearing; residents cite water and safety concerns","audioSeconds",6000,"startMs",7200000,"endMs",13200000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2676431-a0d92441c528c514b54d4d76b855e19e&start=7200&end=13200","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2676431-a0d92441c528c514b54d4d76b855e19e/thumbnail_7200000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6125668/Mohave-County/Arizona/Board-approves-rezoning-and-preliminary-plat-for-Bull-Mountain-area-after-lengthy-public-hearing-residents-cite-water-and-safety-concerns","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125668-eabb41aaaddb0c49a19bc4537a2807e1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775594209&Signature=O9KpcpWwBGE08baj-OH6mwilNqC2Q9oC9gmfeECth7Ytvqff2AscunRNJuLKwnejn-9ybbcSY7HRMu8LCA8n6wViYBNSrf-Jq3bn9yFusQlem0nEI-sKCF4jcqIy7bl4kHQWrz5oNpdk8o0QJEpRNqHmUo9BuT6LAB4sMl~8D~iO90raodfOXxO-dYCewRHLTxFStQYLB-nepBy6uIbo9Fp8Akki7n~Dp4w0i-MJw7ZSA~oQIq7MtTz~sj-K4zZ1MvsuHIPTBSYJYnrBt1WZIHU2rj0xvkn5aCU3ecXL9pMwYnnnlqhyIHfsp5PTsXNkXnHu~9~P9zPZ2O1UPI5VOQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Mohave County, AZ","date","2025-03-17T22:17:11Z","article","The Mohave County Board of Supervisors on March 17 approved two related land-use actions for property north of Kingman known in the record as the Bull Mountain/Fountain Hills area: a rezoning to RE-1 (residential, one-acre minimum) and a preliminary plat for a multi-phase subdivision presented by Engle Homes and related entities.

Public hearing and concerns

The public hearing drew scores of neighbors from Fountain Hills Estates, Desert Fountain and nearby subdivisions. Dozens of residents testified, saying the area lacks sufficient water, has a single egress route for many homes and could face emergency-evacuation problems if the subdivision is built as proposed. Neighbors also raised concerns about traffic impacts on Sun Mountain Boulevard and Stockton Hill Road, construction noise and dust, and the adequacy of local services.

\"If this rezoning should happen to be approved, let it be shown for the record that a requirement needs to be in place as part of the subdivision development,\" said Lynn Petrie, a resident who urged care for native plants and water resources. Multiple speakers said wells have gone dry in the broader subbasin and that reservoir levels and local supply are already stressed.

Developer presentation and concessions

Tyler Engle, president of Engle Homes, and Travin Pennington, who represented the project team at neighborhood meetings, said the land has an approved designation from the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) and that the water supplier has designated adequate water for municipal use dating to a prior filing. Engle pointed to ADWR records showing an allocation the developer says supports the planned buildout and contrasted that with residents' concerns about local well levels.

In response to neighbors, Engle Homes offered concessions during the meeting and in prior community meetings: record a utility easement to provide closer water access to existing homes on Cherrim or Sharon; move or relocate cluster mailboxes off the Sun Mountain Boulevard collector to a safer location inside the subdivision; and construct or grade Fountain Hills Boulevard and Cherrim Road to county unsurfaced-road standards and seek county acceptance for regular maintenance. Developer representatives also committed to preserving a rock outcropping on the site.

Board action and conditions

The board voted to approve BOS Resolution No. 2024-234 (rezoning) and Resolution No. 2024-235 (preliminary plat and petitions of exception). The board added conditions that the developer limit residential lots for the property as approved (board discussion recorded a limit of no more than 50 residential lots), preserve the identified rock outcropping in perpetuity, and address safety by submitting a traffic-impact analysis and making road improvements to county standards where specified. The preliminary plat approval was explicitly conditioned on a traffic-impact analysis to be reviewed by county public works.

Staff and technical notes

County Development Services staff said the proposed lot pattern is consistent with certain general-plan designations and noted that detailed engineering (drainage, stormwater retention, road design) remains part of the plat-review process. County attorney staff clarified that Arizona law requires private owners to notify the Arizona Department of Agriculture before removing protected native plants (ARS citation provided by counsel) and that notice procedures exist for protected native-plant removal.

Why it matters

The decisions clear the way for phased development in an area that residents said already struggles with water pressure, single access in an evacuation, and limited county roads. Supervisors and staff noted that many technical requirements remain: traffic analysis, drainage and stormwater retention plans, ADWR adequacy and periodic review, and the county’s land-division standards before final plat acceptance.

What’s next

Development Services and Public Works will review the traffic-impact analysis, drainage reports and the final plat engineering. If the developer completes the road grading and construction to county standards, the county may consider adopting the road segments into the regular maintenance system later in the process. Residents may file formal protests during the statutory notice period; staff will return to the board if a successful protest is received.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Board of Supervisors Meeting - 03/17/2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Mohave County Board of Supervisors approved a rezone to one-acre residential and a preliminary plat for a Bull Mountain/Fountain Hills subdivision on March 17, attaching conditions addressing lot count, preservation of a rock outcropping and the need for a traffic-impact analysis and road improvements.","taxTitle","Mohave County, Arizona","taxId",4183,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6125676,"Mohave County sheriff asks board for 35 deputies and $5.75 million to reduce chronic understaffing",1809,1791000,3600000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2676431-a0d92441c528c514b54d4d76b855e19e&start=1791&end=3600","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2676431-a0d92441c528c514b54d4d76b855e19e/thumbnail_1791000.jpg","/articles/6125676/Mohave-County/Arizona/Mohave-County-sheriff-asks-board-for-35-deputies-and-575-million-to-reduce-chronic-understaffing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6125676-d525bd1761ce18ce82fe19000fdd0e45/orig.mp4?Expires=1775594209&Signature=kJYcg4B3uhB~oFwps0p6v2jRAmljXsAyEvtCbCq8KlUmtQr2wMWLDKDWfBHpiEhptg1Y9mBlI7sdoY6FoKR1pQvsYwOiIK3LDoQhir4HL2uzRBAM3GwSvvN2H3q2F6lMG-PukvEsZRgj2RVqEpLelFAUpvnVegvHPVaXyQiEEAYlVoIua2Q~-f3biWT5gB~Oqa3YbtSK8NK-nxPQbXf-BjOsJaDRQRB5EgoD3bRoURsy4t28wUccIWL-i4JsSHl7DxINhKuvLw7b-POmJc0ruGFOYv2Olq4ToNiApo6LQInHAPq~WDjCBirg4-5jH19V8-J2AqRVTmT-qopVG1TK-w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Sheriff Doug Shuster told the Mohave County Board of Supervisors on March 17 that the county’s patrol division remains understaffed and that the sheriff’s office needs 35 additional deputy positions and pay-scale adjustments to retain experienced officers.

Shuster said the patrol side currently has 57 deputies assigned to street patrol and that the office must pull staff for mandated duties such as detectives, boating enforcement, search-and-rescue and civil process. \"We have 57, gentlemen,\" Shuster told the board. \"We need 35 additional patrol deputy positions today.\" He said the full package — new positions, vehicles, equipment and employee-related expenses — would cost about $4.5 million and that addressing mid-range and top-out pay compression would add roughly $950,000. Shuster presented a combined total of $5,750,000 as the one-year cost to hire 35 deputies and fix pay ranges.

Shuster tied his request to county growth and visitor volume. He said calls for service rose from about 40,000 in 2017 to about 50,000 in the most recent year while county population grew to roughly 227,000. \"At any given time throughout the entire county, you might have 8 deputy sheriffs working the street,\" he told supervisors, noting long travel distances and an average of 235 square miles per deputy.

Shuster described operational impacts if staffing and pay are not addressed: longer response times, investigative delays, more single-officer patrols and officer safety risks. He described recruitment and retention pressures: starting pay is near local market levels, but mid-range and top-out pay lag competitors, causing deputies to leave after several years. \"By the time you have a deputy with 10 years on... he’s looking at the peer that went to the police academy with them, and he says, 'How are you making $6 an hour more than me?'\",\" Shuster said.

Supervisors asked about cost and logistics. Supervisor Martin asked how much it costs to hire and train a recruit; Shuster estimated about $100,000 for a new, inexperienced deputy (academy, field training, equipment and vehicle). In response to questions about funding, supervisors discussed options including prioritization, reallocations and potential dedicated revenues; Supervisor Gould suggested a dedicated small sales tax for public safety but did not present a formal proposal. Shuster said the sheriff’s budget request as presented was not included in the department’s current budget filing.

Board members thanked Shuster and his staff but expressed caution about the timing and scale of new recurring costs given county budget constraints. Several supervisors said the request must be weighed against other departmental needs and long-term fiscal planning. No formal appropriation or budget amendment was adopted at the March 17 meeting.

Why it matters: Mohave County covers a large geographic area with a substantial volume of visitor-related and rural calls for service. The sheriff framed the request as a public-safety imperative tied to response times, officer safety and investigative capacity.

What’s next: Shuster asked the board to find a \"path\" to the requested funding for FY2026; supervisors asked staff to include the request in budget deliberations and to examine potential funding options before final budget adoption.

","Sheriff Doug Shuster told the Board of Supervisors on March 17 that patrol staffing and mid-range/top-out pay compression leave deputies stretched thin across the county. He asked the board to fund 35 deputy positions and pay adjustments estimated at $5.75 million total; discussion focused on timing and funding sources.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board approves rezoning and preliminary plat for Bull Mountain area after lengthy public hearing; residents cite water and safety concerns

Mohave County sheriff asks board for 35 deputies and $5.75 million to reduce chronic understaffing