A significant discussion unfolded during the March 6, 2025, POST Commission meeting, centering on the investigation into alleged misconduct involving Deputy Robledo. The focus was on accusations of dishonesty during an internal affairs investigation, which has raised questions about the integrity of the findings.
Commissioner Nieto highlighted that the dishonesty in question pertains specifically to the internal affairs investigation, not interactions between Robledo and his superiors. He pointed out discrepancies in the complainant's statements, particularly regarding the number of poker chips involved in the incident, which were noted as 500 versus the video evidence showing only 300. This inconsistency has led to a deeper examination of the case, which dates back to 2020.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The timeline of the investigation was also scrutinized. It was revealed that Robledo declined to be interviewed during the criminal investigation, which contributed to delays in the case. The district attorney took nearly three years to decide on the case, ultimately returning it to the agency in July 2023.
Commissioners expressed concerns about the limited scope of the evidence presented, particularly regarding the transcripts of interviews with Robledo and his supervisors. Commissioner Gordon emphasized the need for the full transcripts to make an informed decision about Robledo's future as a police officer in California. He argued that the recollections of supervisors are crucial in assessing the allegations of dishonesty.
Commissioner Doreen echoed this sentiment, stating that without access to all relevant documents, the commission may be at a disadvantage in making a fair determination. The commission agreed that a comprehensive review of all evidence would be essential before proceeding to an evidentiary hearing.
As the investigation continues, the commission is poised to ensure that all pertinent information is available for a thorough evaluation of Deputy Robledo's conduct, underscoring the importance of transparency and accountability in law enforcement.