Local advocacy groups oppose SolarAPP+ permit software in upcoming House Finance meeting

During the recent Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) Work Session held on March 18, 2025, in Pitkin County, significant discussions centered around a controversial bill related to solar energy permitting. The meeting highlighted strong opposition from various member organizations, including climate action advocacy groups, which expressed concerns about the bill's implications for local governance and land use.

The primary contention against the bill, known as SolarAPP Plus, revolves around its perceived overreach and lack of local stakeholder engagement. Critics argue that the legislation undermines local authority by limiting human review of solar permit applications, which could lead to conflicts with existing land use regulations. This sentiment was echoed by several commissioners who emphasized that the bill does not align with the county's established criteria for land use, particularly regarding building heights and setbacks.

Commissioner Jeffrey raised concerns about the bill's compatibility with current land use practices, stating that the introduction of additional software for permit processing would not enhance the efficiency of solar adoption. He pointed out that the county already has a permissive stance on roof-mounted solar installations, suggesting that the proposed changes could complicate rather than streamline the approval process.

The discussion also touched on the potential fiscal implications of the bill, with commissioners noting that it currently carries a zero-sum fiscal note. This raises questions about the financial responsibilities that may fall on local governments if the bill is enacted. The board expressed a collective intention to formally oppose the legislation, with plans to draft a letter of opposition and potentially prepare for testimony should the bill progress to the Senate.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, with upcoming hearings in the House Finance Committee, the commissioners are poised to advocate against it. They aim to leverage their position and collaborate with member organizations to ensure that local concerns are adequately represented and addressed. The outcome of this legislative effort could significantly impact local governance and the future of solar energy development in Pitkin County.