Advocates urge expansion of CMCRT for safer crisis response options

The Joint Committees on Public Safety and Public Health and Human Services of the Philadelphia City Council convened on March 19, 2025, to address critical issues surrounding crisis response services in the city. The meeting highlighted the urgent need for reform in how emergency situations are handled, particularly regarding the involvement of law enforcement.

One of the key discussions centered on the experiences of individuals who have faced trauma when seeking help during crises. A participant shared their personal account, expressing a deep discomfort with traditional emergency services such as 911 and 988, citing past traumatic experiences. This sentiment resonated with many, as it underscored a broader concern about the messages these services send to those in need of assistance.

The testimony revealed a consistent desire among community members for a middle ground in crisis response—an option that provides help without the automatic involvement of police. Many individuals expressed fear that calling for help could lead to unwanted police presence, which they believe could exacerbate the situation rather than alleviate it. This dilemma places individuals in a challenging position, forcing them to choose between seeking help and risking further harm to themselves or their loved ones.

In response to these concerns, the Community Mobile Crisis Response Team (CMCRT) was highlighted as a promising alternative. Advocates called for the expansion and full funding of CMCRT, emphasizing its potential to support individuals in crisis without resorting to coercive measures that could lead to further trauma.

The committee acknowledged the evolving nature of this discussion, indicating a willingness to adapt and improve crisis response strategies based on community feedback. The meeting concluded with a commitment to consider the testimonies presented and explore ways to enhance support for vulnerable populations in Philadelphia.

Overall, the session underscored the pressing need for a reformed approach to crisis intervention, prioritizing compassionate and effective support while minimizing the risks associated with traditional emergency services.