Pennsylvania County debates Ballico data center amid farming community concerns

In the heart of Pittsylvania County, a heated debate unfolded during the Board of Supervisors Business Meeting on March 18, 2025, as community members voiced their opinions on a proposed data center project by Valco. The atmosphere was charged with emotion as residents expressed concerns about the potential impact on the county's agricultural heritage and the environment.

One passionate speaker, a local resident, raised alarms about the risks associated with the project, warning that large data centers and gas power plants could lead to pollution and a decline in property values. "How much appreciation do we truly have for our farmers if we are so quick to get rid of their land?" they questioned, emphasizing the importance of preserving prime farmland for future generations. The speaker painted a vivid picture of a community grappling with the threat of industrial blight, urging the board to consider the long-term implications of their decision.

In contrast, supporters of the Valco project highlighted the economic benefits it could bring to the county. Tim Reynolds, representing Valco, spoke about the company's commitment to refining their proposal based on community feedback. He emphasized the potential for significant revenue generation, stating that the project could bring tens of millions of dollars to the county, which could be used to improve public services and infrastructure.

Aubrey Myers, another resident, echoed this sentiment, arguing that the county needed to embrace technological advancements to avoid being left behind. He pointed out that the data center could provide much-needed jobs and economic development, which are crucial for funding essential services like schools and public safety.

As the meeting progressed, the board heard from various speakers, each presenting their perspectives on the project. Gary Hodge, the mayor of Hurt, passionately urged the board to seize the opportunity for development, arguing that the county's historical reliance on agriculture was no longer sustainable. He called for a decisive vote in favor of the project, framing it as a chance to break free from the cycle of economic stagnation.

The discussions revealed a community at a crossroads, grappling with the balance between preserving its agricultural roots and embracing new economic opportunities. As the board prepares to make a decision, the voices of both supporters and opponents will undoubtedly shape the future of Pittsylvania County, leaving residents eager to see how their leaders will navigate this pivotal moment.