Illinois House Bill 3375, introduced on March 19, 2025, aims to amend the Personal Information Protection Act by restricting the routine collection of social security numbers (SSNs) by data collectors. The bill, sponsored by Representative Joyce Mason and co-sponsored by Representative Natalie A. Manley, seeks to enhance the privacy of Illinois residents by ensuring that SSNs are only collected when there is a "specific and immediate need," a term that the bill defines.

The primary purpose of HB3375 is to address growing concerns over identity theft and data breaches, which have become increasingly prevalent in the digital age. By limiting the circumstances under which SSNs can be collected, the bill aims to protect individuals from potential misuse of their personal information.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders regarding the balance between data collection for business purposes and the need for consumer protection. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward safeguarding personal information, while opponents may raise concerns about the potential impact on businesses that rely on data collection for operational efficiency.

The bill is categorized as a "slight partisan bill," with a sponsorship ratio of three Democrats to one Republican, indicating some level of bipartisan support but also potential political divides. As it progresses through the legislative process, further debates and amendments may arise, particularly regarding the definition of "specific and immediate need" and its implications for various industries.

If passed, HB3375 could have significant implications for businesses operating in Illinois, requiring them to reassess their data collection practices and implement stricter protocols to comply with the new regulations. This could lead to increased operational costs for some companies, while also fostering a greater emphasis on consumer privacy and data security.

As the bill moves forward, stakeholders will be closely monitoring its developments, as its outcome could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, reflecting a growing trend toward enhanced data protection measures nationwide.