Illinois defines esthetics and cosmetology practices in new legislation

On March 19, 2025, the Illinois House of Representatives introduced House Bill 3318, a legislative proposal aimed at redefining the scope of practice for cosmetologists and estheticians in the state. This bill seeks to clarify the boundaries between cosmetic services and medical treatments, addressing ongoing debates about the roles and responsibilities of beauty professionals.

The primary purpose of House Bill 3318 is to establish clear definitions and limitations for the practices of cosmetologists and estheticians. It delineates the services that can be offered under each profession, emphasizing that neither can engage in treatments intended to affect the living layers of the skin. This distinction is crucial as it aims to protect consumers from unlicensed medical practices while allowing beauty professionals to provide a range of cosmetic services, such as manicuring, pedicuring, and skin care treatments.

Key provisions of the bill include a detailed description of esthetics, which encompasses practices like massaging, cleansing, and beautifying the skin, as well as applying makeup and removing body hair. However, estheticians are explicitly prohibited from offering medical advice or treatments for skin diseases. This limitation is intended to ensure that clients receive appropriate care from licensed medical professionals when necessary.

The introduction of House Bill 3318 has sparked notable discussions among stakeholders in the beauty industry. Supporters argue that the bill will enhance consumer safety and clarify the roles of beauty professionals, potentially reducing the risk of malpractice. However, some industry representatives express concerns that the bill may impose unnecessary restrictions on trained professionals, limiting their ability to offer comprehensive services.

The economic implications of this bill could be significant, as it may affect the operations of beauty salons and spas across Illinois. By clearly defining the scope of practice, the bill could lead to increased compliance costs for businesses that must ensure their staff are properly trained and licensed. Conversely, it may also foster consumer confidence in the services provided, potentially boosting business for compliant establishments.

As House Bill 3318 moves through the legislative process, its outcomes could reshape the landscape of the beauty industry in Illinois. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill may set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, reflecting a growing trend toward regulating cosmetic practices more stringently. The ongoing discussions surrounding the bill highlight the delicate balance between consumer protection and professional autonomy in the beauty sector, a conversation that is likely to continue as the bill progresses.