Ann Arbor residents urge planning commission to protect public input in development codes

The Ann Arbor City Planning Commission faced significant community pushback during its meeting on March 18, 2025, as residents voiced strong concerns over proposed amendments to the unified development code. The amendments, which aim to streamline development processes, have raised alarms about diminishing public input and transparency in local governance.

Several residents, including Nancy Leff and Tom Stahlberg, highlighted the potential negative impact of these changes on neighborhood character and public engagement. Leff argued that the amendments prioritize developer convenience over community interests, warning that they could eliminate essential public hearings and reduce citizen notification regarding developments that affect their neighborhoods. "These actions undermine the principles of open government and public participation," she stated, emphasizing the need for transparency in decision-making.

Stahlberg echoed these sentiments, noting that many community members remain confused about the proposed changes and their implications. He urged the commission to delay any votes until clearer communication could be established, ensuring that residents fully understand the potential impacts on their neighborhoods.

Additionally, concerns were raised about specific infrastructure issues, such as the proposed bike lanes on Miller Avenue. Resident Holly Elliott warned that narrowing the road could hinder emergency services, as police and ambulances rely on Miller for quick access to the west side of the city. She called for a reconsideration of the plan to ensure public safety is not compromised.

The meeting underscored a broader issue of communication between city officials and residents. Rachel Pooley pointed out that many community members were unaware of the ongoing engagement processes, suggesting a need for improved outreach and information dissemination.

As the commission moves forward with its agenda, the feedback from residents highlights the critical importance of balancing development with community needs and maintaining open lines of communication. The implications of these discussions will likely shape the future of Ann Arbor's neighborhoods and the role of public participation in local governance.