In a move that could reshape the landscape of state contracting, Illinois Representative Kam Buckner has introduced House Bill 4023, aimed at prohibiting state agencies from entering into contracts with entities found guilty of insurrection or advocating for the overthrow of the government. This legislation, introduced on March 19, 2025, seeks to amend the Illinois Procurement Code by establishing strict criteria for businesses and individuals eligible for state contracts.
The bill's primary provision mandates that no state agency can engage in contracts with any business, person, or entity that has been legally determined to have committed insurrection, as defined under federal law (18 U.S.C. 2383) or specific provisions of the Illinois Criminal Code. Furthermore, it requires local governments to adopt similar regulations, ensuring a uniform approach across the state regarding contracting with potentially dangerous entities.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The introduction of HB 4023 comes amid heightened national discussions about accountability and the integrity of public contracts, particularly in the wake of events that have raised concerns about domestic extremism. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to safeguard public resources and uphold democratic values, while critics warn that it could lead to overreach and potentially infringe on the rights of businesses and individuals.
Debate surrounding the bill has already begun, with some lawmakers expressing concerns about the implications for free speech and the potential for political bias in determining what constitutes insurrection. The bill's language leaves room for interpretation, which could lead to contentious legal battles over its enforcement.
Economically, the bill could have significant implications for businesses operating in Illinois, particularly those in sectors reliant on government contracts. If passed, it may limit opportunities for companies that have faced legal challenges or public scrutiny, potentially impacting job creation and economic growth in the state.
As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders from various sectors will be closely monitoring the bill's progress. The outcome of HB 4023 could set a precedent for how states manage contracts with entities deemed a threat to governmental stability, raising questions about the balance between security and civil liberties. The Illinois General Assembly will likely face ongoing discussions and amendments as they navigate the complexities of this controversial legislation.