Judge Boyd guides jury selection in Austin firearm possession case

The March 19, 2025, session of the 187th District Court in Texas, presided over by Judge Stephanie Boyd, commenced with the formal introduction of the court and its procedures. Judge Boyd emphasized the importance of courtroom decorum and the jurors' responsibilities, particularly regarding their ability to follow instructions during the trial.

The judge initiated the proceedings by confirming the court's location and the identities of the parties involved in the case against defendant Mr. McKinney, who is charged with unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. She instructed the jurors on the significance of their role, explaining that they would hear arguments presented in hypotheticals and that they must not consider the indictment as evidence of guilt.

Throughout the session, Judge Boyd elaborated on key legal principles, including the presumption of innocence, the right to remain silent, and the burden of proof, which she defined as "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." She clarified that this standard is higher than the "preponderance of the evidence" used in civil cases, ensuring jurors understood the gravity of their decision-making process.

The judge also addressed potential biases among jurors, asking if anyone felt they could not be fair due to personal experiences. She reiterated the importance of impartiality, particularly in light of the case's nature. Additionally, she explained the two phases of a criminal trial: the determination of guilt and, if applicable, the sentencing phase, where the jury would decide on the punishment if Mr. McKinney were found guilty.

Judge Boyd concluded the session by discussing the range of punishments for the charge, which could be between 2 to 10 years, and encouraged jurors to consider the full range of potential sentences should they reach a guilty verdict.

Overall, the meeting served as a foundational step in the trial process, establishing the framework within which the jurors would operate as they prepared to hear the case against Mr. McKinney. The court will reconvene to continue the proceedings, with the jurors tasked with upholding the principles of justice and fairness as outlined by Judge Boyd.