California bill targets threats against judges and court officials with stricter penalties

California lawmakers have introduced Assembly Bill 352, a significant legislative measure aimed at enhancing the protection of judicial officials from threats and intimidation. Introduced on March 18, 2025, the bill seeks to amend existing laws regarding threats against judges and court personnel, as well as the act of picketing near court buildings and residences.

At the heart of AB 352 is a provision that allows courts to consider threats against judges or court commissioners as aggravating factors during felony sentencing. This means that individuals who willfully threaten to cause death or great bodily injury to these officials could face harsher penalties. The bill also expands the definition of unlawful picketing, making it a misdemeanor to protest near the homes or workplaces of judges, jurors, witnesses, or court officers with the intent to obstruct justice or influence their duties.

The introduction of this bill has sparked notable debate among lawmakers and civil rights advocates. Proponents argue that it is essential to safeguard the integrity of the judicial system and protect those who serve within it from intimidation and violence. They emphasize that threats against judges undermine public trust in the legal process. However, critics raise concerns about potential overreach and the implications for free speech, arguing that the bill could stifle legitimate protests and dissent.

Economically, the bill imposes a state-mandated local program without requiring reimbursement for local agencies, which could lead to increased enforcement costs. This aspect has drawn scrutiny, as local governments may need to allocate resources to manage the new regulations.

As California grapples with rising tensions surrounding judicial proceedings, AB 352 represents a critical step in addressing threats against the judiciary. Legal experts suggest that if passed, the bill could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, potentially reshaping the landscape of judicial protection nationwide. The bill is currently under review, with its future implications poised to resonate beyond California's borders.