Assembly Member Rogers introduces bill to restrict rooster fighting activities

The California Assembly convened on March 18, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 928, a legislative proposal aimed at imposing restrictions on the ownership and management of roosters. Introduced by Assembly Member Rogers, the bill seeks to address concerns related to animal welfare and public safety, particularly in urban areas where the keeping of roosters can lead to noise disturbances and potential conflicts with neighbors.

The bill builds upon existing laws that prohibit the fighting and injuring of roosters, which are classified as misdemeanors. AB 928 aims to expand these regulations by introducing specific guidelines for the care and management of roosters, including restrictions on their ownership in residential areas. The proposed legislation is part of a broader effort to regulate poultry production and ensure compliance with animal welfare standards.

During the committee discussions, proponents of the bill highlighted the growing concerns among residents regarding noise pollution caused by roosters, particularly in densely populated neighborhoods. They argued that the bill would provide necessary protections for community members while still allowing for responsible ownership of poultry. However, some opposition emerged from agricultural advocates who expressed concerns that the bill could unfairly target small-scale farmers and hobbyists who keep roosters for personal use or as part of their farming practices.

The bill has undergone amendments since its introduction, reflecting ongoing negotiations and attempts to address the concerns raised by various stakeholders. As it stands, AB 928 is positioned to be re-referred to the Committee on Agriculture for further review, where additional discussions and potential amendments may take place.

The implications of AB 928 extend beyond animal welfare; it also touches on social dynamics within communities and the balance between agricultural practices and urban living. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill could set a precedent for how local governments regulate livestock in residential areas, potentially influencing similar legislation in other states.

As the legislative process continues, the future of Assembly Bill 928 remains uncertain, with advocates and opponents closely monitoring its progress. The next steps will involve further committee evaluations and potential debates on the floor of the Assembly, where the bill's fate will ultimately be determined.