Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Payroll Providers Seek Exemption Amid Regulatory Burdens on Small Businesses



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Payroll Providers Seek Exemption Amid Regulatory Burdens on Small Businesses
The Senate Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections, and Consumer Protection convened on December 19, 2023, to discuss significant regulatory concerns affecting small businesses in Wisconsin, particularly regarding payroll service providers (PSPs).

During the meeting, a representative highlighted the challenges faced by small firms in complying with new regulations proposed in recent legislation. The representative, speaking on behalf of their members, emphasized that the inclusion of payroll service providers in the regulatory framework could impose substantial compliance costs, potentially driving smaller businesses out of the market. This consolidation among larger firms could lead to higher prices and reduced choices for consumers.

The representative pointed out that in other states like Indiana, California, and New York, policymakers have opted not to include payroll service providers in similar legislation, citing the unnecessary burden of increased regulation. They argued for an exemption for PSPs acting solely as agents of their employers, as defined by IRS guidelines. This exemption would allow these providers to continue operating without the added regulatory layers that could hinder their ability to serve small businesses effectively.

The discussion also touched on the financial implications of compliance, including legal fees and licensing costs that escalate as businesses expand into multiple states. The representative urged the committee to consider these factors and work with the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) to find a reasonable solution that protects both consumers and small businesses.

The committee members expressed interest in continuing the dialogue with DFI and the stakeholders involved to explore potential exemptions and ensure that the legislation does not inadvertently harm small businesses while still achieving its intended consumer protections. The meeting underscored the delicate balance between regulatory oversight and the operational realities faced by small firms in Wisconsin.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting