[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6628823,"mediaKeyId","2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05","parentId",2714596,"title","Subcommittee debates one‑shot funding, carryforward and program matches for teacher pipeline and JAG","audioSeconds",1565,"startMs",2324000,"endMs",3889000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05&start=2324&end=3889","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05/thumbnail_2324000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6628823/Nevada/Subcommittee-debates-oneshot-funding-carryforward-and-program-matches-for-teacher-pipeline-and-JAG","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6628823-c54e8d2fd6de79769d6cf4c20e2cc172/orig.mp4?Expires=1770448175&Signature=I~tsOZYAis3dwR9VtImXua9WDglibCKgd-Fbfbgi8bf0c3bHS30bXx5L6m0nyP3CV9b26qqFDIndcRTbyQKMhlj2HO3yBxCNpnby6qGGvhsAkNe8jxRgHP6bXyixNbrYlLyu7Vzo~SGaMQVsVzjiPhPWiUNMfFIIgqcj8AWIPQwpK4GOuXKOILQ31LLvahfBVlWho8UNkZUhxUTFOpxARNwLMQWbYRExnwG1fS4qrwcWKNOwZ7qJYxMSUiQDNJ~EpqCSN0qUngA79z24u5gFlfKTyMMj6BcOGMfPwfm8YpUTE9-ktCO-Izi~biOLdNw-M-HcXs2tXCirf5OgkpFKig__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Nevada State Legislature","date","2025-03-20T16:42:37.337Z","article","Lawmakers on the Joint Subcommittee examined multiple state categorical programs grouped in budget account 2699 and account 2718, focusing on how one‑shot appropriations and carryforward restrictions affect scholarships, dual‑credit supports, career and technical education (CTE) activities and a JAG enhancement.

Megan Peterson, deputy superintendent for the Nevada Department of Education, summarized account 2699 as the location for smaller state categorical programs that did not move into the pupil‑centered funding plan. She described decision units that include dual credit functions, staff contract increases for “Jobs for Nevada’s Graduates,” and a one‑shot appropriation for the incentivizing pathways to teaching program. On the incentivizing pathways program Peterson said the request includes one‑shot funding of $6,700,000 in each year of the biennium intended for tuition assistance or paid teaching stipends; the department noted there is no 25% holdback for this set of funds.

Committee members asked whether one‑shot status and current budget language hamstring districts’ and providers’ ability to spend funds across years. Peterson said one‑shot funding and uncertainty about carryforward “introduce instability in our ability to ensure that funding is available for those in the future.” Jeff Brisky added that SB 81 contains language to allow carryover of incentivizing‑pathways funds and that the department is pursuing budget amendments to align funding sources with program needs.

The subcommittee also discussed Jobs for America’s Graduates (JAG). Renee Cantu, a JAG representative, told the committee JAG now raises roughly 34% of its program budget from corporate and other sources and that the state fund covers the remaining 66%. Cantu said if the roughly $314,000 enhancement were not approved, the program would likely lay off three to four state‑licensed specialists and lose services for an estimated 180 to 240 students across 14 counties.

Members asked about matching requirements and why certain transfers were not included in the governor’s recommended budget. Department fiscal staff told the committee that the department did not have confirmation from an external funding source (referred to in testimony as Dieter) at the time the recommended budget was built; the department said it plans to file a budget amendment after confirming that external funding will continue.

Account 2718, which holds funds for the Teach Nevada scholarship program (an alternative route to licensure), drew questions about reconciliation and recordkeeping. Peterson said the program’s administration moved from universities to the department and that records from prior leadership were incomplete; she said the department is working to reconcile past awards and intends to submit requests to access the IFC contingency account for a previously set‑aside $3.2 million after completing reconciliations.

Finally, the committee heard testimony from Anna Reynolds, director of the Office of Career Readiness, Adult Learning and Education Options, who asked the panel to remove “disabling” statutory language that currently prevents state career and technical education funds from being used for career and technical student organizations (CTSOs) and professional development. Reynolds said districts often charge students fees to participate in CTSOs and that allowing state funds to cover those costs would help districts meet maintenance‑of‑effort requirements and spend state CTE dollars for their intended purposes.

No votes were taken on account 2699 or 2718 during the hearing. Department staff indicated they will work with fiscal staff to submit the promised budget amendments and to provide district‑level cost information for CTSO participation and professional development.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","3/20/2025 - Senate Finance and Assembly Ways and Means Subcommittee on K-12/Higher Education/CIP","oneSentenceSummary","Lawmakers on the Joint Subcommittee examined multiple state categorical programs grouped in budget account 2699 and account 2718, focusing on how one‑shot appropriations and carryforward restrictions affect scholarships, dual‑credit supports, career and technical education activities and a JAG enhancement.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature NV, Nevada","taxId",78440,"location","Nevada","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6628828,"Legislators question funding and carryover for Nevada Teacher Advancement Scholarship",805,1523000,2328000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05&start=1523&end=2328","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05/thumbnail_1523000.jpg","/articles/6628828/Nevada/Legislators-question-funding-and-carryover-for-Nevada-Teacher-Advancement-Scholarship","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6628828-5a40c9599c615917ba20e19e32984acb/orig.mp4?Expires=1770448175&Signature=mplGqhQAG2V9FBrUWb5RYY3-dDO3vPEzLzebPiaaeUhjMzZvEYmyWS05AFJM~Ff8peprb9o3MySdtRoR89sYtwU3nBXQdLEZ0hyA5C7PufhW5R9b2SpEi2B7A9sfPQdeJ5rhPecutS--Ppc-iMU6DqvAOCp-cr2vwbyIfhTO15scX0Jeu9308wJ3nvtcfgFOQFvYQak5RZv-PMLVDuslBmAh57TjMu-1w8s4twaX62vkvW-eI--GENRlWPIViY48ScqsLFbtKuP7wXvYaNAEqrfdTzpyilcG4G~oO1b3TXoYkxI-MiZb7WIynjx~dqdie0lQrsB5RYKGF7vjE8mvKw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Joint Subcommittee on K‑12, Higher Education and CIP heard detailed questions about the Nevada Teacher Advancement Scholarship (budget account 2622) on the first day of budget hearings, including whether unspent prior-year appropriations will revert to the general fund and what amount the department needs to reserve to meet future 25% completion payments.

Megan Peterson, deputy superintendent for the Nevada Department of Education (NDE), told the subcommittee that the account “provides funding for teachers who have completed their master’s degree and have served three consecutive years within the Nevada teaching position within a public school,” and that the governor’s recommended budget includes enhancement E140 of roughly $323,000 per year to cover the 25% holdback paid after the three‑year service obligation is met.

The department’s director of educator licensure, Jeff Brisky, told the panel “so far we’ve had nearly 200 educators that were able to benefit from this program.” He said applications increased — 866 for FY25 versus 294 in the program’s first year — and that demand could draw down available funds. Brisky and other department staff described reconciliation complexity: provider institutions report awards and the department must reconcile each scholarship line by line at fiscal year close to determine final liabilities.

Committee members pressed the department on carryforward and reversion. Assemblymember Backus said the package originally provided $2 million per year in one‑time funding and asked whether unspent balances revert under AB 400. Brisky said his understanding was that prior‑year funds did not revert, but later acknowledged he would need to recheck. NDE fiscal staff reported there is currently about $500,000 in a 25% reserve. According to the department’s reconciliation for FY24, the state board awarded $1.5 million and approximately $971,000 was expended; the department estimated the FY24 25% liability at about $243,000 and a provider award liability that together would produce an approximate total FY24 liability of $433,000 if every educator completes the program.

Several members said the uncertainty creates a need for a budget amendment if those prior appropriations do indeed revert. Brisky said, “if that is the case then we would need an amendment to cover our future liability.” Peterson agreed and said the enhancement request aims to ensure funds are available in the next biennium to meet obligations; she told the committee the department is working with fiscal staff to determine whether an amendment is needed.

Members also questioned why the governor’s recommended budget limits new general‑fund support for this scholarship in the 2025–27 biennium. Peterson answered that the recommendation reflects the state’s current budget balance and that uncertainties about carryforward and future liabilities affect how much recurring funding is proposed.

No formal action or votes were taken on the account during the hearing. Department staff said they will review reversion rules referenced by committee members and, if necessary, pursue budget amendments and provide additional reconciliations to the committee.

The subcommittee moved on after committee members asked for follow‑up on reversion language and for NDE to provide further reconciliation of liabilities and carryforward assumptions.","The Joint Subcommittee heard that uncertainty about carryforward rules and budget classification is complicating liabilities and future awards for the Nevada Teacher Advancement Scholarship; department staff said roughly 200 educators have benefited but fiscal reconciliation and possible reversion rules may require a budget amendment.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6628819,"Teachers, students and parents urge lawmakers to preserve and increase K‑12 funding",1596,3989000,5585000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05&start=3989&end=5585","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2714596-073e6b5a25256e22d050be01650aaf05/thumbnail_3989000.jpg","/articles/6628819/Nevada/Teachers-students-and-parents-urge-lawmakers-to-preserve-and-increase-K12-funding","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6628819-aa4f90061303a6a78f388eedf4cbe068/orig.mp4?Expires=1770448175&Signature=o6KPWJBp9bsoKm9PC7jivmUKyi2cT9931IJYydSp5mZ2nem1reYFMCjN0Gb0enCWmP5ZKNz5a~lVFyRwR9p8s6sBB8Yu25xQ4OP-~whC23eKqoi-Kyc70OTAjct1UdtgaYvXqb0G-PCGHOGfT4~z-4Gu7aK~g4D4SXeXaO6pGdtrMG1nDknKtN4sdR0IqhD3eTx7L5V9tm1TjZHQPXimJY6yw2mHklVNq0GRAlxF~2vvvg9UpvYwXJZgjmRYvIc-1eYQJdIrmuwuiJihD2kVNPNMVEfxUc7QDzSdeBiRGakAqK1VqqI4~x7QFGj08b-rzH164mo0utcjSrMYIww7tA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Public comment at the end of the subcommittee hearing featured educators, students and union members asking lawmakers to preserve and expand K‑12 funding and opposing program cuts.

Gilbert Lenz, an agricultural welding and mechanics teacher at North Valleys High School, urged lawmakers to simplify and reorient student teaching funding so districts can pay student teachers directly. Lenz said funding mechanisms currently are “convoluted” and that student teachers need direct support while completing field placements. He also asked the committee to remove the restrictive language that prevents districts from using state CTE funds for career and technical student organizations (CTSOs), noting that his students must fundraise to participate in FFA competitions.

Kaylee Krentz, a Washoe County School District choir teacher who holds a master’s degree, described working a second job to make ends meet and asked legislators to “continue funding education” so that educators do not need multiple jobs to survive. Krentz said she borrowed a car and used food‑delivery apps to make extra income while teaching and caring for her family.

Other commenters included Alex Gauvain, a fourth‑grade teacher and building representative for the Washoe Education Association, who said the governor’s proposed budget would amount to a $9 million cut for Washoe County and warned about the effect on Title I schools and intervention services. Dolly Rowan, an early‑childhood teacher in Clark County, recounted large class sizes, medical needs and insufficient staff in self‑contained classrooms and said she sent “an SOS” asking for continued funding.

Students from Silverado High School — Elias Salas, Marciano Soperis and Kiara Bautista Orozco — spoke about proposed cuts to their GRTC/JROTC program, describing leadership and career skills they say they gain from the program and asking lawmakers to preserve it. Callers on the line included Kimberly Shepherd, an adaptive physical education teacher, Philip Kaiser, a long‑time classroom teacher, and Susan Kiser, a retired national‑board certified teacher; each urged the committee to adopt the Commission on School Funding plan and to continue investments that aim to bring Nevada closer to the national average in per‑pupil spending.

No policy or vote resulted directly from public comment; committee members acknowledged the testimony and closed the hearing.","During public comment at the subcommittee hearing, multiple teachers, students and callers urged lawmakers to pass the funding plan and avoid cuts to programs such as JROTC/GRTC and CTSOs; witnesses described classroom strain, second jobs, and direct student impacts from program reductions.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Subcommittee debates one‑shot funding, carryforward and program matches for teacher pipeline and JAG

Legislators question funding and carryover for Nevada Teacher Advancement Scholarship

Teachers, students and parents urge lawmakers to preserve and increase K‑12 funding