In a tense meeting held on December 5, 2024, the Citrus County Planning and Development Commission faced a complex application that sparked heated discussions about land use and zoning regulations. The focal point was an application for a conditional use permit that would allow a commercial shooting range on a parcel of land currently classified for agricultural use.

As the meeting unfolded, board members grappled with the implications of allowing a commercial firing range in a rural area, where such operations are not permitted under current zoning laws. The applicant, Mr. Mathena, expressed his desire to transition the property into a wholesale nursery while also maintaining a shooting range for personal use. However, the board made it clear that the commercial aspect of the shooting range would need to cease for any agricultural use to be approved.

Commissioner Sherrif articulated the board's position, stating that the application was inconsistent with the Citrus County comprehensive plan and land development code. He emphasized that the commercial firing range could not continue if the application were to be approved. This sentiment was echoed by other commissioners, who expressed concerns about setting a precedent that could lead to further non-compliance with zoning regulations.

The discussion also touched on the agricultural exemption, with staff clarifying that a residence must be established before certain agricultural activities, such as keeping chickens, could be permitted. This led to further debate about whether Mr. Mathena could legally operate a shooting range on his property if he established residency.

Ultimately, after extensive deliberation, the board voted to deny the application. The decision was met with mixed reactions, with some commissioners expressing sympathy for Mr. Mathena's situation while others remained firm in their stance against the commercial use of the property. The denial was based on the belief that the proposed use would adversely affect the public interest and was incompatible with surrounding properties.

As the meeting concluded, the board acknowledged the complexities of the permitting process in Citrus County, highlighting the challenges faced by applicants navigating the regulations. The outcome leaves Mr. Mathena with the option to reconsider his plans, potentially seeking a path forward that aligns with county codes and community standards.