A contentious debate over property compliance took center stage at the Citrus County Code Compliance Special Master meeting on May 15, 2024, as homeowners and county officials clashed over the status of a cottage that some claim is being used as a residence without proper permits.

The discussion revolved around a cottage on a property purchased by Martha Hoglund in 2015, which was originally permitted as a shed in 1997. County officials argued that the structure has not been legally converted into a dwelling, emphasizing that any changes to its use require specific permits. "Just because you call it a cottage doesn’t magically convert it from a shed," a county representative stated, underscoring the need for compliance with local building codes.

Hoglund defended her position, asserting that the cottage has always been used as a living space, a claim supported by her neighbor, Diane Elmhurst. Elmhurst testified that the previous owners had tenants living in the cottage, and Hoglund's son, who has autism, currently resides there. "This is a perfect fit for him to have his independence in a safe environment," Elmhurst remarked, highlighting the community's acceptance of the cottage's use.

Despite the testimonies, the county maintained that Hoglund must apply for a permit to convert the structure legally. The Special Master ultimately denied a motion to dismiss the case, allowing the county to present its evidence. The outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for similar cases in Citrus County, as the community grapples with the balance between property rights and regulatory compliance.

As the meeting concluded, the Special Master indicated that further proceedings would continue, leaving residents and officials alike awaiting a resolution that could impact local housing practices.