Commissioners approve Tradewinds Resort's renovations including boardwalk and pickleball courts

November 22, 2024 | Citrus County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commissioners approve Tradewinds Resort's renovations including boardwalk and pickleball courts
The Planning and Development Commission Board of Citrus County convened on November 21, 2024, to discuss several key agenda items, including modifications to existing developments and new proposals. The meeting began with a review of condition number five regarding unpermitted structures, where a motion was made to allow for the possibility of permitting rather than outright removal of such structures. The motion, supported by Commissioner Schauer and seconded by Commissioner Royce, passed with a vote of four to one, with Commissioner Facemeyer dissenting.

Following this, the board addressed application PED2212 concerning the Tradewinds Fishing Resort. The proposal aimed to amend the existing planned unit development (PUD) to include a boardwalk, a caretaker's residence, and pickleball courts. The applicant, John Miller, explained that the boardwalk had previously been permitted but never finalized, necessitating a new site plan. The addition of pickleball courts and the potential use of the clubhouse for housing a manager were also discussed.

Staff planner Melissa Morris provided an overview of the property, highlighting the need to update the master plan to include the boardwalks and other proposed structures. She clarified that while the boardwalks were previously permitted, they had not been included in the master plan, which is required for current permitting processes. The board also discussed the implications of the proposed pickleball courts, noting that if the area is determined to be wetlands, additional permits would be required.

Commissioners raised questions about the density of the development, with staff confirming that the current proposal does not increase the number of units, as the development is grandfathered under an older PUD. The board emphasized that any future modifications, such as the proposed footbridge, would require further review and public input.

During the public comment portion, Randall Lipson, representing a property owner, inquired about potential assessments related to the proposed developments. The board acknowledged the concern but did not provide a definitive answer at the time.

The meeting concluded with a clear direction for the next steps in the permitting process, ensuring that all modifications align with existing regulations and community standards. The board's decisions reflect a commitment to balancing development needs with environmental considerations and community input.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe