EPIC attorney Cara Williams opposes Maryland AI working group citing urgent regulatory need

In a pivotal session of the Maryland General Assembly's Finance Committee, discussions centered on the urgent need for regulatory measures surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and local legislative initiatives. The meeting, held on March 20, 2025, featured a range of testimonies that highlighted both the potential and the pitfalls of emerging technologies.

Cara Williams, an attorney with the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), voiced strong opposition to House Bill 956, which proposes the establishment of an AI working group. Williams argued that while the formation of such a group could be beneficial, it should not be the sole action taken by the legislature. She emphasized the pressing need for immediate policy measures to address the documented inaccuracies and discriminatory practices associated with AI systems. Williams pointed out that the proposed working group lacks representation from crucial stakeholders, including labor unions, civil rights organizations, and privacy advocates. This absence, she warned, could lead to a biased approach that fails to protect marginalized communities most affected by AI's shortcomings.

Following Williams' testimony, the committee shifted its focus to local legislative matters, including House Bill 372, presented by Paul Andrews on behalf of Delegate Julian Ivey. This bill seeks to remove a sunset provision for a local development authority in Prince George's County, allowing its beneficial work to continue. The bill has already garnered significant support, passing the House of Delegates with a vote of 135 to 2.

The session also addressed House Bill 664, introduced by Brooks Scoville, Chief of Staff for Delegate Jen Tarasa. This bill aims to align the disciplinary authority of the Board of Nursing across all professions under its jurisdiction, ensuring consistency in how disciplinary actions are applied. Scoville explained that the bill would rectify a gap in the regulations for licensed direct entry midwives, thereby enhancing the board's ability to manage licensing effectively.

As the meeting progressed, the committee members engaged with the presenters, seeking clarity on various points. The discussions underscored the importance of balancing innovation with accountability, particularly in the realm of AI, while also addressing local governance needs.

The session concluded with a sense of urgency surrounding the need for comprehensive AI regulation and a commitment to supporting local initiatives that benefit Maryland communities. As the legislature continues its work, the implications of these discussions will likely resonate throughout the state, shaping the future of technology and governance in Maryland.