Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Alpine Estates residents oppose zoning change to increase housing density

May 08, 2024 | Cranston City, Providence County, Rhode Island



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Alpine Estates residents oppose zoning change to increase housing density
In the heart of Cranston, Rhode Island, the City Plan Commission meeting on May 7, 2024, became a battleground for local residents concerned about proposed zoning changes that could reshape their community. As the evening unfolded, voices from the Alpine Estates neighborhood rose in unison, expressing deep apprehension over the potential impact of increased development in their area.

One resident, who has called Alpine Estates home for 36 years, articulated the community's fears about the strain on local infrastructure. With the neighborhood growing from approximately 190 homes to around 450, the single entrance and exit on Alpine Estates Drive has become a significant concern. “As development in Western Cranston continues to increase, the schools, the police, and fire departments are being burdened,” she stated, highlighting the overcrowding at Orchard Farms Elementary School and the traffic issues plaguing the area.

Another resident, Annette Osberg, echoed these sentiments, questioning the integrity of the zoning change process. She recounted the history of the property in question, noting that a previous proposal to change the zoning from A80 to A20 had failed. “Do we honestly think the council realized they were approving a change regarding a development where neighbors were so adamantly opposed?” she asked, suggesting that the decision-making process lacked transparency and community input.

Osberg's remarks underscored a broader frustration among residents who feel sidelined by developers and city officials. “We are just people who believe you should build under the rules when you bought your property,” she asserted, emphasizing that the opposition was not against development itself, but rather against altering zoning regulations to accommodate new projects that could overwhelm their community.

The meeting revealed a palpable tension between the aspirations of developers and the concerns of long-standing residents. As discussions continued, it became clear that the stakes were high—not just for the future of Alpine Estates, but for the very fabric of the community itself. With the potential for significant changes looming, residents left the meeting with a mix of determination and uncertainty, eager to protect their neighborhood from what they perceive as unchecked growth.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting