[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6117598,"mediaKeyId","2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310","parentId",2729532,"title","Planning Commission split on Spring Creek Estates rezoning request for South College parcel","audioSeconds",1612,"startMs",1049000,"endMs",2661000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310&start=1049&end=2661","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310/thumbnail_1049000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6117598/Auburn/Lee-County/Alabama/Planning-Commission-split-on-Spring-Creek-Estates-rezoning-request-for-South-College-parcel","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6117598-a5f8db1bb47cdaa83d39de7a874c17fa/orig.mp4?Expires=1777208761&Signature=EOVCtmgwQ1Z21RTxEMv3Yf~jaCzCCbMW0DZds1aaUxWhQc7PZbL-4YXIR-z4DA098FW7KOMjUcJr6P0GryNfe5iF7S-6B-XoHS2v9oB3i069J9EEgTtKiv2mFiVW05y5ZFWc-CoDlTdCapCuBNHwnMsyLY9WNrZZerzjPK0LibzJGtsLsRkSvEwWyl7AczlteDX~XUW8LHVECncaQQJBMRIwXoDHQidSoRdbWRx7Uksn27R~iTFw~XpBfdCG72csntpYeB3S4PA2l83YMIdtE3QdPzTjUrbOPUV2gP5fIMY-sNxJbZWoHSjkIcV9Sl~0lp9GjB7-N6EOAo7dmaqVKw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Auburn City, AL","date","2025-03-21T11:49:40Z","article","Auburn Planning Commission members debated a rezoning request March (date not specified) to change about 1.2 acres on South College from Neighborhood Conservation NC-20 to Neighborhood Conservation NC-14, a zoning change the city staff said would allow one additional single-family lot.

The rezoning request, filed as case RZ2025-1 and presented by city planning staff, would reduce the minimum lot size requirement from roughly 20,000 square feet (NC-20) to about 14,000 square feet (NC-14). Staff told the commission the change would not alter permitted uses — both districts allow only single-family housing — but would slightly increase allowable density and make a modest subdivision layout possible.

Why it matters: neighbors said the smaller lot size and added units would change the character of the South College corridor and might increase traffic and downstream flood risk. The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be part of the public record before any final decision by the City Council.

Staff presentation and applicant intent
City planning staff explained the district differences and noted the subject parcel touches NC-14 on two sides, which staff said reduces the risk of “spot zoning.” The presenter described the likely effect as the creation of one additional lot under NC-14 compared with the current NC-20 designation.

Brandon Hayes of Hartbrook Development, the applicant, told the commission he controls the subject parcel and the adjacent NC-14 lot to the north and intends a small single-family development of about five homes, similar in character to nearby Carmela Court. Hayes said the proposed design uses shared driveways that already connect to South College and that driveway waivers have been coordinated with the city’s engineering department should the rezoning be approved.

Neighborhood concerns
Cori Reynolds, speaking for the Tallinn Court neighborhood (733 South College), said lots in that neighborhood average about three-quarters of an acre and that subdividing the 1-to-2-acre parcel down to third-acre lots would create a noticeably denser, smaller-house pattern unlike the surrounding street. Reynolds also said a portion of the nearby land is used for detention and is affected by the same floodplain issues.

Commission discussion focused on floodplain and traffic impacts. Commissioners asked whether all proposed homes would sit inside FEMA floodplain zones and whether the subdivision would require floodplain modeling and compensatory storage. The applicant said they had retained a floodplain consultant and had begun coordination with city engineering; the applicant said the model and FEMA review would be part of subsequent engineering steps and that homes could be elevated or built on floodable crawlspaces if required. City staff clarified that the formal HEC-RAS modelling and any FEMA review would come later if development proceeds.

Vote and next steps
A motion to forward approval of RZ2025-1 (Spring Creek Estates) to the City Council was made and seconded. A roll-call vote was recorded as follows: Nonnette Reese — Yes; Dana Kemp — No; Bill Chancellor — No; David Wisdom — Yes; Joseph A. Stroop — No; Jennifer Stevens — No; Oscar Mosley — Yes; Walker Davis — No. The roll-call record in the transcript shows three recorded yes votes (Reese, Wisdom, Mosley) and five recorded no votes (Kemp, Chancellor, Stroop, Stevens, Davis). The clerk then stated on the record that the matter will go to the City Council. The transcript does not contain further action in this meeting.

What remains unresolved
Commissioners and neighbors asked for the floodplain modelling and a clearer site/layout before any subdivision is undertaken. The applicant said those technical studies are under way; staff said final plat or engineering approvals would address floodplain, stream buffer and driveway details. The commission debate focused on compatibility with neighborhood character, traffic/driveway configuration and ensuring no adverse downstream flood impacts.

Ending note
The Planning Commission’s formal record and votes will be included in the referral materials sent to the City Council for its review and decision.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Auburn Planning Commission Meeting March 20, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Auburn Planning Commission members debated a rezoning request March (date not specified) to change about 1.2 acres on South College from Neighborhood Conservation NC-20 to Neighborhood Conservation NC-14, a zoning change the city staff said would allow one additional single-family lot.","taxTitle","Auburn, Lee County, Alabama","taxId",4270,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6117586,"Neighbors push back on Tiger Crossing preliminary plat; applicant says traffic study submitted and units will be rentals",1895,3604000,5499000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310&start=3604&end=5499","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310/thumbnail_3604000.jpg","/articles/6117586/Auburn/Lee-County/Alabama/Neighbors-push-back-on-Tiger-Crossing-preliminary-plat-applicant-says-traffic-study-submitted-and-units-will-be-rentals","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6117586-69671489b59d3f2bb21ebc06ff9a30d1/orig.mp4?Expires=1777208761&Signature=b5iV-zgCw8B9p6~ihLsU9C79R2qX5OJ3KzQ3fOSc9e0K7t0gVQFCPblF8q2QNXxeaAjy-NC88HQhA-ZPZt10ccTH7iSQaxHPZKrq4BvDtj0aMzE9MMRvgeApabDSh2SCtD-XH9hmD-6T0NT-D9e3BZxSn00BJpYnYZj~~WJ1Qwl1Jh5Pz1Qtvy7S5OctSmi6~A9fmqKB8b~iEFLxclkCmdrfvjulVoEzdY-er3siFJf8lS1SdnvbU~w6cCwbOC6Bu8E-yLQwCT2vsvjbV15vUeXcYz0KY8SIkamnNK5FD7mMT1DkRBm~STgvj57-cIyU1k3t0pXocnTPuvrdmrZFpQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A preliminary plat application for a 136‑lot performance residential development (referred to in the packet as Tiger Crossing) drew extended public comment March (date not specified) as nearby Hickory Woods residents urged the commission to require design changes or deny the plat in its current form.

Proposal and zoning
The applicant proposed a mixed product of twin homes and townhouses on roughly 20.9 acres at the current terminus of Hickory Woods Drive. The property is zoned Comprehensive Development District (CDD); the applicant said the proposed gross density was about 6.3 dwelling units per acre (132 residential lots as presented in the staff packet), with roughly 30% open space shown on the preliminary materials.

Neighbors’ concerns
Multiple Hickory Woods residents described the proposal as incompatible with the existing low‑density character of their neighborhood. Comments from residents included:
- Fear that the development would substantially increase vehicle traffic through narrow neighborhood streets that lack sidewalks and are used for walking and children’s activities.
- Worries about clear‑cutting of mature hardwood forest and loss of habitat and canopy.
- Concern that the open space calculation on the applicant’s materials overstated usable open space (residents said much of the labeled open area consisted of detention ponds, buffers and easements).
- Requests for larger buffers (25 feet or more), enhanced landscaping, privacy fencing, and a pedestrian bridge or bollard-equipped pedestrian/maintenance crossing at the end of Hickory Woods rather than unrestricted vehicular connectivity.

Applicant and staff responses
Applicant representatives said a traffic impact study had been submitted and city staff had issued comments; the developer stated they intend construction access via Kent Drive rather than using Hickory Woods, and confirmed the units are planned as rental units (cottages, twin homes and townhomes). The developer said they had been coordinating with city departments and that site design preserved as much tree cover as feasible given topography; staff noted stream buffers and wetlands are regulated and that Corps of Engineers permitting and mitigation would be required if impacts are found.

Questions still open
Residents and commissioners asked for clarity on: the open‑space calculation methodology; construction staging and construction‑vehicle routing; the specifics of required buffer widths adjacent to Hickory Woods and Kent Drive; whether the developer would restrict construction traffic to Kent Drive; and whether a pedestrian‑only connection with removable bollard access for emergency/maintenance vehicles could be provided in place of full vehicular connectivity.

Action at the meeting
The meeting transcript records extended public comment and staff/applicant responses; the excerpt does not include a final vote or formal approval for the preliminary plat. Staff and applicant representatives said they are continuing coordination on required studies (traffic, wetlands and engineering) and that certain conditions (such as construction access and buffering) could be addressed through staff review and final plat requirements.

Ending note
The transcript shows substantial neighborhood opposition and a record of technical questions that staff and the applicant said they are addressing. The preliminary plat remained dependent on the results of technical studies (traffic model, wetlands delineation and final engineering) and on final plat review; no final action is recorded in the provided transcript excerpt.","A preliminary plat application for a 136‑lot performance residential development (Tiger Crossing) drew extended public comment March (date not specified) as nearby Hickory Woods residents urged the commission to require design changes or deny the plat in its current form.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6117592,"Planning Commission conditions Northern Pines preliminary plat approval; requires barriers at road stubs",870,2523000,3393000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310&start=2523&end=3393","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310/thumbnail_2523000.jpg","/articles/6117592/Auburn/Lee-County/Alabama/Planning-Commission-conditions-Northern-Pines-preliminary-plat-approval-requires-barriers-at-road-stubs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6117592-18c97bc340f9f2c5f9a26ef63941a5a1/orig.mp4?Expires=1777208761&Signature=lf5AgybJwjhknCKxDBpBodi--kL1uVGp1gncc2UCaJJnBW0rWhRGTCL2hNdBFkj2r1rwlj4TAnKi8b7eHhQlDpisIRnjxvsR7p1nnBy7XdwZWObsPv92wP2glSqOgBeK8mH02k4Ec9BBj~9DUw9cluFH7ds5HX8amC2rGI~FT8kPiKQ2ic2cPz39g-nDrc70GerPsRm60oHH~MBCA~N8V9UKnWpqF8-AYBaqwiGqsQET9Fvd9JAKppar83vj3PIHygLAiG~k5LLsih~yjwLE-5YQbTnyb5baNU~0sl-hIrSESHO2cBmIZ24VwM2YEKS-XubVWt2ukdfCuo3jXGEGvg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Auburn Planning Commission approved a preliminary plat for the Northern Pines development (preliminary plat PP2025-004, petitioner name not specified) after public comment and staff review, adding a condition to provide barriers at two street stub-outs.

What was proposed
The preliminary plat before the commission designated 74 residential performance lots (including 6–8 townhomes), three open-space lots and two future commercial lots at the Farmville/Highway 280 area. The applicant’s plan relies on the underlying DDH zoning and an approved PDD overlay that provided an increased density in exchange for added buffer space.

Staff review and conditions
Staff noted the proposal’s density, building envelope and PDD commitments — including a 20-foot underserviced buffer as part of the density exchange — and reported no substantive outstanding planning objections other than routine technical comments. The development will include a mixture of residential lot types and retain the commercial portion along the Farmville/280 corner.

Public comments and city response
Nearby residents raised safety and trespass concerns about two stubbed streets that terminate on private properties and extend into adjacent wooded yards. City staff and the applicant said wetland delineation and mitigation would follow the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting processes, and that required delineations and mitigation plans must be provided before final plat approval.

Commission action
A motion to approve the Northern Pines preliminary plat (PP2025-004) passed with a condition that the developer install a physical deterrent — such as a header curb/curve or similar barrier — at the ends of Arabel Street and Croft Drive to reduce unintended driving and trespass into adjacent private yards. The motion included the staff report conditions. The commission’s recorded action: motion, second, verbal vote in favor; no roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript excerpt.

Next steps
Staff will verify the required wetland delineation, Corps of Engineers permits where applicable, and confirm the barrier design during final plat and construction plan review. The applicant and staff indicated they will coordinate on landscaping and the PDD buffer requirements before final plat submission.

Ending note
The approval is preliminary; required technical permits (wetlands/Corps, final engineering) and final plats must be completed before any site work begins.","The commission approved the Northern Pines preliminary plat for a 74‑lot residential development with conditions including a 20‑foot buffer exchange and a barrier treatment at two road stub intersections to deter trespass and vehicle access into neighboring lots.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6117582,"Planning Commission approves consent agenda and several preliminary plats; items forwarded as appropriate",2619,982000,3601000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310&start=982&end=3601","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2729532-5123ad7aec0afea972538f7eace54310/thumbnail_982000.jpg","/articles/6117582/Auburn/Lee-County/Alabama/Planning-Commission-approves-consent-agenda-and-several-preliminary-plats-items-forwarded-as-appropriate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6117582-9cf8a2b8c01547289b1cb228a0ff44bf/orig.mp4?Expires=1777208761&Signature=BwCbzElm6-5YGXWXnTySh5v4WMcNW80978hQ3CKrZj2T1vHoR2sS1o1H71p1YuWOHCn5Nw1hdA-CsqGebVS61DSDBSdrN~NRyZa6IfE8dc10jOvde4e8qEhp8heZr-CuCW6j8xqTHEaYUzFerbRMWu4cs57Ff6wPyOC1O8X8tlzVH-M8Na4oQMk0wBh-jTFnVO6OZbaxHohglPhMCbcncIvxqajzX-lvPnQK5rtrFu6C08MrVD7rl7ivdQX6ikERxliGOzpPkKVr0SIWdp44OgH9ZHfans7PXrgNf1-unhcR-VsfYMrupQzux1FN6lgRlPLu3LvTuuIuKQjbqt0thA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Auburn Planning Commission handled a series of routine and preliminary actions during its March meeting (date not specified), approving the consent agenda and multiple preliminary plats with standard staff conditions.

Consent agenda
The commission approved the consent agenda, which included packet and regular meeting minutes from February and final plats for: Tallmadge Subdivision, Quill Chase Phase 2, Dawson Villas Phase 3, Longleaf Crossing Phase 7, Maddox Street Redivision, and the annexation of Mitchell Farms 2. A motion to approve the consent agenda was made, seconded and passed by voice vote.

Preliminary plats and routine approvals
Following staff presentations and limited public comment, the commission approved the following preliminary plats with staff‑recommended conditions (motions, seconds and affirmative voice votes recorded in the transcript):
- Longleaf Crossing Phase 8 (PP2025-005): preliminary plat approval with staff conditions; motion and second recorded and approved by voice vote.
- Links Crossing Phase 5 (PP2025-006): preliminary plat approval recorded by motion and second; voice vote in favor.

Northern Pines preliminary plat was considered separately and received approval with a specific condition (barrier at stub outs) — covered in a separate article.

What this means
These approvals allow the applicants to proceed to final‑plat and engineering submittals; each project must still resolve technical staff comments (engineering, stormwater, buffering and landscaping) and obtain any required permits prior to construction or final plat recordation.

Ending
Residents with questions about specific plats are advised to consult Planning Department staff during the application and DRT (Development Review Team) stages for details on engineering, stormwater, and permit requirements.","The commission approved the consent agenda and multiple preliminary plats with routine staff conditions. Notable procedural items included final plats on the consent agenda and approvals for Longleaf Crossing Phase 8 and Links Crossing Phase 5; Northern Pines received separate conditional approval (see separate article).","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning Commission split on Spring Creek Estates rezoning request for South College parcel

Neighbors push back on Tiger Crossing preliminary plat; applicant says traffic study submitted and units will be rentals

Planning Commission conditions Northern Pines preliminary plat approval; requires barriers at road stubs

Planning Commission approves consent agenda and several preliminary plats; items forwarded as appropriate