New Mexico's House Bill 12, introduced on March 21, 2025, is making waves as it seeks to enhance public safety through stricter firearm regulations. The bill aims to establish a framework for extreme risk firearm protection orders, allowing law enforcement to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a significant danger to themselves or others.

At the heart of HB 12 is the requirement for law enforcement officers to provide a detailed account when petitioning for these orders. Officers must outline the credible information that led to the petition, the circumstances surrounding the case, and a clear statement of the perceived imminent danger posed by the individual in question. This structured approach is designed to ensure that the process is both thorough and transparent.

The bill also mandates that individuals who receive a temporary or one-year extreme risk order must relinquish their firearms immediately. They can surrender their weapons to law enforcement or a licensed federal firearms dealer, ensuring that the process is handled safely and responsibly. A receipt documenting the relinquished firearms is required, adding an extra layer of accountability.

While proponents argue that HB 12 is a necessary step toward preventing gun violence and protecting vulnerable individuals, the bill has sparked notable debates. Critics express concerns about potential overreach and the implications for Second Amendment rights. As discussions unfold, experts emphasize the importance of balancing public safety with individual freedoms.

The implications of HB 12 could be significant, potentially setting a precedent for similar legislation across the country. As New Mexico grapples with the complexities of gun control, the outcome of this bill may influence future legislative efforts and public discourse on firearm safety. With the bill now under consideration, all eyes will be on the New Mexico House as they navigate this contentious issue.