Minnesota modifies ignition interlock program extending driver penalties without judicial review

Minnesota lawmakers are addressing a significant gap in the state's ignition interlock device program, which could impact drivers facing extended requirements due to alleged violations. During a recent meeting of the Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, officials discussed the need for judicial review options for drivers who dispute the commissioner's actions regarding interlock extensions.

Currently, if a driver is found to have violated the terms of their ignition interlock program—such as registering a blood alcohol content of 0.02 or higher—they face automatic extensions of their program duration. For instance, a first violation results in an additional 180 days, while subsequent violations can lead to extensions of up to 545 days. However, a recent court ruling highlighted that the statute does not allow for judicial review of these extensions, leaving drivers without a legal remedy to contest the commissioner's decisions.

Mr. Siegel, a representative from the Department of Vehicle Services (DVS), explained that while administrative reviews exist, they often lack the depth needed for nuanced legal challenges. For example, if a driver blows a 0.03 and then registers a 0.00 shortly after, it raises questions about the accuracy of the interlock device. Currently, drivers can only seek administrative review, which may not adequately address complex cases.

The committee's discussions indicate a push for legislative changes to amend Minnesota statute 171.19, ensuring that drivers have the right to judicial review when facing extensions of their interlock requirements. This change aims to provide a fairer process for individuals who believe they have been wrongly penalized, ultimately enhancing the integrity of the ignition interlock program.

As lawmakers consider these amendments, the implications for drivers could be significant, offering them a clearer path to challenge decisions that affect their driving privileges and livelihoods. The committee's actions signal a commitment to ensuring that the legal rights of drivers are upheld within the state's regulatory framework.