This article was created by AI using a key topic of the bill. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the full bill. Link to Bill

On March 24, 2025, the Minnesota State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 660, a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating firearm use during the regular deer hunting season. The bill delineates specific areas within the state where different types of firearms may be used, addressing both safety concerns and hunting practices.

The primary focus of Senate Bill 660 is to establish a "shotgun use area," where only shotguns loaded with single-slug shells, muzzle-loading long guns, and handguns are permitted for deer hunting. This area encompasses a defined boundary that includes parts of Clay, Douglas, Otter Tail, Todd counties, and others, ensuring that hunting practices align with safety protocols in more populated regions. Outside of this designated area lies the "all legal firearms use area," where hunters can utilize a broader range of firearms.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

The introduction of this bill has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers, hunting advocates, and safety organizations. Proponents argue that restricting firearm types in certain areas will enhance safety for both hunters and nearby residents, particularly in regions with higher population densities. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential limitations on hunting practices and the implications for local hunters who may prefer using different firearms.

The bill's implications extend beyond hunting regulations; it touches on broader issues of community safety and wildlife management. Experts suggest that by clearly defining firearm use areas, the legislation could lead to a more organized hunting season, potentially reducing accidents and conflicts between hunters and the public.

Family Scribe
Custom Ad
As the bill moves through the legislative process, it will likely face further amendments and debates. Stakeholders from various backgrounds, including environmental groups and hunting organizations, are expected to weigh in, shaping the final outcome. The community will be watching closely, as the decisions made in the coming weeks could significantly impact hunting traditions and safety measures across Minnesota.

Converted from Senate Bill 660 bill
Link to Bill

Comments

    View Bill

    This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

    View Bill

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI