Ashland University proposes Jefferson Street closure amid Burger King objections

The Ashland City Council meeting on March 18, 2025, featured heated discussions regarding a proposed closure of Jefferson Street, primarily driven by Ashland University’s beautification project. The proposal has sparked significant concern from local business owners, particularly those associated with the Burger King franchise, who argue that the closure would severely impact their operations.

During the meeting, representatives from Burger King expressed that approximately 67% of their business comes from drive-thru customers, with many accessing the restaurant via Broad Street and Jefferson. They warned that redirecting traffic to Davis Street would not only complicate access but also increase congestion and the risk of accidents at nearby intersections. The franchise's legal counsel emphasized that the proposed changes could lead to a decline in customer traffic and, consequently, a decrease in revenue, potentially jeopardizing the business's future in the community.

In contrast, Ashland University officials defended the project, asserting that it serves a public purpose by enhancing safety and aesthetics around the campus. They highlighted the university's investment in the community and the importance of creating a welcoming environment for students and visitors. University representatives argued that the project would not eliminate access for Burger King but rather improve the overall flow of traffic and pedestrian safety.

The council was urged to consider the implications of the street closure carefully, with calls for a traffic study to assess the potential impact on local businesses and traffic patterns. Business owners requested that the council either table the proposal for further review or reject it outright, citing a lack of sufficient public safety justification for the closure.

As discussions continue, the council faces the challenge of balancing community development and safety with the economic interests of long-standing local businesses. The outcome of this proposal could significantly affect the dynamics of the area, highlighting the ongoing tension between urban development and the needs of existing businesses.