Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Court sets plea deadline for drug case against Daniel Choppa IV

March 24, 2025 | Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Court sets plea deadline for drug case against Daniel Choppa IV
The morning docket of the 187th District Court, presided over by Judge Stephanie Boyd on March 24, 2025, addressed several cases, focusing on plea agreements and procedural compliance.

The session began with a discussion regarding a case involving Maria Valer Villareal, who was recently arrested in February. This was noted as her first setting in court. The attorney indicated that while they had reviewed the case, additional documentation was needed from the client. The judge inquired about the status of discovery, to which the attorney responded affirmatively. The state was prompted to tender a plea offer, but it was unclear if one had been made. Judge Boyd set a plea deadline for April 24, 2025, and confirmed that the defendant was appropriately dressed for court.

Following this, the court moved on to the case of Daniel Chapa IV. The attorney for Chapa confirmed receipt of all discovery and that it had been reviewed with the client. The judge confirmed compliance with discovery requirements and proceeded to discuss the true bill of indictment with Chapa. He waived the reading of the indictment and acknowledged understanding the charges against him, which included possession of a controlled substance, classified as a state jail felony. The judge outlined the potential penalties, which could range from 180 days to 2 years in a state jail facility, along with a possible fine of up to $10,000.

Chapa was informed of his rights, including the right to a jury trial and the right to remain silent. He confirmed his understanding and intention to enter a plea. The attorney affirmed that Chapa had a rational understanding of the charges and was competent at the time of the offense. Chapa denied any coercion or promises beyond the plea agreement and expressed satisfaction with his legal representation.

The meeting concluded with both cases being addressed methodically, ensuring that all procedural requirements were met and that defendants were informed of their rights and options moving forward. The court's next steps will include monitoring the plea deadline for Villareal and any further proceedings for Chapa.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI