[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6111032,"mediaKeyId","2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6","parentId",2753988,"title","187th District Court: multiple pleas, deferred adjudications and revocations resolved; sentences and probation conditions ordered","audioSeconds",3180,"startMs",6275864,"endMs",9456545,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6&start=6275&end=9456","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6/thumbnail_6275864.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6111032/Texas/187th-District-Court-multiple-pleas-deferred-adjudications-and-revocations-resolved-sentences-and-probation-conditions-ordered","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6111032-658c3a13d6b53c6fc9aaa20e0b590fb7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775427555&Signature=PLJ2Kbf9qOXd9ktBJCnsFrlvnK80qakKek9ubK0afmXh4BLvWU2ODUdFfkx4Fl11aB4gS9KFtNr7pdakvTm8tVJxdoRb~rrIRxXaJHwT-6Td1EvGkxTSaooeLqaHiQcamJajmwzC0rTZHVZGFlR2AbwFg2-z9Ufc0RxUfL-lpT30iobNz1z-~9fqSr4Mzbsf9vBdMeUmCWF2jOLbMlKYWtMHvjKw4GdNjuCMquRT9YxzcvQKNHjjMNGu4FTr~iA~yxHCimJw3io6pSg7efukRVOTP9WMZSqy-Wdf2d5Z9ajRu6XL01wMr-1gREQ1yHvq2LviJh~l7UkJAEUzd~uliQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-03-24T17:23:46Z","article","Judge Stephanie Boyd disposed of several matters during a crowded docket, accepting pleas, granting one counsel withdrawal, imposing probation conditions and finding a drug-court violation true in another case.

Key outcomes at the hearing included:

- Ashley Yvonne Draper Ward: The court accepted a plea of true to an alleged probation violation, adjudicated guilt, and sentenced Draper Ward to two years in the state jail facility with a court recommendation for the therapeutic community; the defense requested credit for 415 days already served.

- Daniel Chapa (listed as Choppa in the record): The court accepted a plea agreement for possession of a controlled substance (PG1, under 1 gram) and sentenced him to nine months in the Bexar County Jail with an $800 fine; the court noted credit for time served.

- Kavanta Tyrone Thomas: The court accepted a plea for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and placed Thomas on three years deferred adjudication with reporting requirements, random testing (patch or UA) and proof of employment within 30 days. The court removed an existing GPS condition for Thomas and entered an affirmative deadly-weapon finding consistent with the plea agreement.

- Marcello (Marcello) Flores Jr.: The court found a felony drug-court violation (failure to attend treatment and other matters) true, granted the State's motion and sentenced Flores to four years in prison; the court recommended the therapeutic community for reentry planning.

- Vanessa Portales: The court accepted a no-contest plea (recorded as waiving trial rights and consenting to stipulated testimony), found the evidence sufficient, and entered a sentence set out in the parties' plea (the transcript records a prison term addressed in the plea that the court then suspended and probated with conditions; the court set supervision, TAP evaluation, community-service requirements, a no-contact condition and other standard supervisory terms).

Other docket items included granting a defense attorney's motion to withdraw for Oscar Jimenez and appointing new counsel (Griffin Scott Hill) and scheduling competency-related follow-ups for Jose Romero (magistrate competency evaluation set; return date May 5). Several cases received plea-deadline resets and future hearing dates.

The court routinely admonished parties about courtroom procedure and made clear that plea-deadline dates are binding absent good cause.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","MON., MARCH 24, 2025/JUDGE STEPHANIE BOYD/187TH DISTRICT COURT/MORNING DOCKET","oneSentenceSummary","Judge Stephanie Boyd presided over a docket with several pleas, probation decisions and a drug-court revocation. Outcomes included deferred adjudication with conditions, a state-jail sentence, a plea bargain jail term and a felony revocation to prison.","taxTitle","Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas","taxId",66298,"location","Texas","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6111037,"Return-of-property request heard for Christopher Caballero; court asks parties to check forfeiture proceedings",135,722525,858080,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6&start=722&end=858","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6/thumbnail_722525.jpg","/articles/6111037/Texas/Return-of-property-request-heard-for-Christopher-Caballero-court-asks-parties-to-check-forfeiture-proceedings","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6111037-b040f2c9280c4997b397ed98fb6b35b8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775427555&Signature=Ih7Q5raBoGx8sVYwWkGKeNag~V-3AxM7kBT8jpZLKYrIBDzPiVLNd~odn4OIvXJgEBvLJtP2TpMYOb5PUx1Om-yrmi-E0318zb8LUR2F6Ho97vjMJz3o2fV1H5wVv8bTQLbRMWVXRuKh9uk3IENRUA52ZOQ0K63rrcRB3Za1kBfoDkH5SEBhpLTLBB1Q8rk5DjX-W4wP7VAq-F9~8VWrX-zNzP4yI-MtV5VvXqGbTbJxU4vIpYAr-yIoDfpXRLOqy735R8BbGrqoy4dE14sYcky64y7fmz5kdzoTP-7MDxb2sv1D2FVVH4zm7PqH4L~PaOD3A~hvurpLuIRFIyNIyQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Judge Stephanie Boyd heard a defense request from Christopher Caballero’s counsel for the return of seized property and asked the parties to confirm whether civil forfeiture or other proceedings already exist that would affect return of the items.

Defense counsel told the court that a prior motion had been signed to return property to a third party (identified in the record as Neil Kalfas) and the current filing seeks to have the items returned instead to Caballero. The prosecutor told the court the state agreed to return items listed as numbers 17 and 18 in the property spreadsheet, which counsel said represented currency and likely a phone.

Judge Boyd asked whether any civil suit or forfeiture proceeding had been filed that would bar immediate return. The prosecutor said she did not believe civil forfeiture had been initiated on the items at issue, and defense counsel asked the court to have staff check the court record to confirm. The judge offered to set a hearing if necessary and asked the parties to approach at the clerk’s station to confirm next steps.

No final order returning property was announced at the hearing; the parties agreed to check court records and to proceed to a hearing if records show pending forfeiture litigation.","Defense sought return of property seized in Christopher Caballero's matter and told the court items should be returned to Caballero rather than a third party; the state agreed to return certain items (identified in the file as 17 and 18) and the court requested the parties check for parallel forfeiture proceedings.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6111042,"Judge Boyd denies motion to reinstate bond for Daniel Montoya after alleged GPS/condition violations",753,1779605,2532645,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6&start=1779&end=2532","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2753988-c7e53be510bd237f64109f3c12221ee6/thumbnail_1779605.jpg","/articles/6111042/Texas/Judge-Boyd-denies-motion-to-reinstate-bond-for-Daniel-Montoya-after-alleged-GPScondition-violations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6111042-81285712009fe55830c7fe703497930c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775427555&Signature=DFFqdAmXDn7TxqZRmHj3MsblX-FB4QWztxrsBdhhBz1abLjo8dClnMb54VI7-s7FYHTLPetQd4WhEY2f10Q09eLK2RgBNXsPDrtAGdU8AwwMnEuJA~eiTaE0CBfhc2-Z9p-1QyYv2Z3pO6J3eAeoX6~fhUw87cPcuXa3mk0wJCBExACA6HsdT96cDklOocs18sLQQDwhW330WmB8YsiptgCUceGpsldolzoRlYMtLVGop3ZWqBZJ9pBRFPLz6WDT~jvlwtwXGbtu4PGy7ZCMy-ngoYTpAHjbHW~cRhnwrXrIt1KSGDQLhrZ6-zv6MZA~0vuADk9Hx7fbgEoh3W-o3A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Judge Stephanie Boyd of the 187th District Court denied a defense motion to reinstate the commercial bond for Daniel Montoya, citing unresolved questions about the bondsman’s position and alleged violations of Mon toya’s release conditions.

Montoya’s attorney asked the court to reinstate bond and to allow Montoya to return to the Haven for Hope with his electronic monitor, saying Montoya turned himself in after learning of a warrant and that the shelter would provide medication and support. The defense described the arrangement at Haven for Hope as preferable to another supervised residence arranged by a provider called Lifetime.

The state opposed reinstatement, saying Montoya violated the terms of his partial GPS release by spending time near bars and failing to follow pretrial conditions. The prosecutor noted Montoya had been the subject of prior hearings and that the behavior indicated a risk of further violations given the underlying aggravated-assault charge and two alleged victims.

Judge Boyd declined to reinstate the bond, saying the first legal hurdle was whether the commercial bondsman wanted the bond reinstated; the court had no affidavit or statement from the bondsman. She also said she was not inclined to reinstate the bond on the record before her and denied the defense motion.

The court recorded that Montoya had been on a partial GPS condition that allowed movement only for approved employment or schooling; the judge and the prosecutor discussed whether that condition should be called a curfew. The judge also invited the defense to confer with the bondsman and said the parties could reapproach the court if the bondsman indicated a willingness to reinstate the surety.

No new bond was set at the hearing; Montoya remains in custody pending further proceedings.","Judge Stephanie Boyd denied a defense request to reinstate the commercial bond for Daniel Montoya after the state argued he violated pretrial conditions and the court found no indication the bondsman sought reinstatement.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

187th District Court: multiple pleas, deferred adjudications and revocations resolved; sentences and probation conditions ordered

Return-of-property request heard for Christopher Caballero; court asks parties to check forfeiture proceedings

Judge Boyd denies motion to reinstate bond for Daniel Montoya after alleged GPS/condition violations