[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6110539,"mediaKeyId","2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943","parentId",2757673,"title","Committee advances bill requiring clear labels for lab-grown meat; sponsors say consumers deserve to know","audioSeconds",896,"startMs",5375000,"endMs",4479000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943&start=5375&end=4479","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943/thumbnail_5375000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6110539/Colorado/Committee-advances-bill-requiring-clear-labels-for-lab-grown-meat-sponsors-say-consumers-deserve-to-know","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110539-aa5f8c8a21a168f44f95141f0fd01611/orig.mp4?Expires=1777696788&Signature=VI~6Id2c3YZaZyyPkKif-tULQKZ8WIIs76tfVRU1K15RFNWqvh-QKJpeA75zZfo2mB2y6nCO1gBeFXuBiwd~MAEJhJWj-nu8-cmPRzwyU58mmDaPhmyeIDKXJY4qC7WyO-IpEXr8ByZRgQSlDcFhS5v1BUgA0XaGWMGPnqpHEB~85Mv9Bxj5kyIxGmKDr4FUriFKH5szpklSLNre3bOx-dEn4KrSBkIn3syII6YPvTeb2LsFIMLg~oP~5X~P4p5LfR9rSmkLuzv2QTaxi5U1Qg0~5Q3mVbAbi-3jEFmImfkBKnewGN0NUpU~0C0SdDjBL7KLqTyH8ZzZ7r4u8~0yuw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Colorado State Legislature","date","2025-03-20T00:00:00Z","article","The Colorado Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee on Thursday unanimously advanced House Bill 25-1203, a measure that would require cell-cultivated meat to be labeled in a way that does not mislead consumers into thinking the product is the same as animal-raised beef, pork or poultry.

Supporters argued the bill is narrow: it does not ban cultivated meat but requires that producers not use labeling or marketing that would lead consumers to believe a product is conventionally raised meat. \"Consumers have a right to know what is in their food and where their food is produced,\" testified Tyler Garrett of Rocky Mountain Farmers Union. Tim Miller of Colorado Farm Bureau and other agriculture witnesses told the committee the bill protects long-standing producer verification practices and prevents lab products from leveraging the reputation earned by family farmers and ranchers.

Several witnesses also raised health and technical questions about cell-cultivated products; some urged caution and clear labeling until long-term safety and ingredient questions are resolved. Representative voices from food retailers and environmental groups said the bill focuses on transparency rather than an outright ban.

Senators Pelton and Mullica, the bill sponsors, said the measure is intended to ensure consumer choice and fair marketplace competition, not to block innovation. The committee moved the bill forward with a favorable recommendation; senators placed the bill on the consent calendar for further consideration by the full Senate.

The committee record shows broad bipartisan support; the motion to advance passed by unanimous voice vote and the bill was recommended onward to the committee of the whole.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources [Mar 20, 2025]","oneSentenceSummary","The Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee voted unanimously to send a bill to the committee of the whole that would require cell-cultivated meat to be labeled so consumers understand the product is produced in a lab rather than raised on a farm.","taxTitle","Agriculture & Natural Resources, Standing Committees, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Colorado","taxId",15033,"location","Colorado","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6110549,"Senate committee backs overhaul of Colorado Pet Overpopulation Fund, removes TNR mandate and alters board makeup",3150,1649000,4799000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943&start=1649&end=4799","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943/thumbnail_1649000.jpg","/articles/6110549/Colorado/Senate-committee-backs-overhaul-of-Colorado-Pet-Overpopulation-Fund-removes-TNR-mandate-and-alters-board-makeup","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110549-ee2d760185e054982206639ad67343dd/orig.mp4?Expires=1777696788&Signature=OPYwi~DY1-bBVxzcM16a6zdsdQtCzS-ICAID2u0vqbUMfC9Onu3rb47t9ZzFtEbEn~goD98trMnzhmA90mkF2-l1gPd-rjYKuysOWmkYpCPV6ygdHx9x~cA1U2lGLmpfrCDOFY7mthZZ~3kVOmTLf1JDghyixz8GTuDzp6A7R~zBdvlaoUyfoVJKrjK64y~WX1NTA2Mihnt0wQe7wix0QXOeLOES1Gy~A596eVCsuiMLLDlMrrYX2kPOHwWra9edWhD5RqJeNFGMr5vC3nGlHzGzV03c8HNYlNzPgQcmWhWkZUG6MlKvxnbNcwJGPlj7PZOb73T~gu6WgOtiAaarVg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senators on the Colorado Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee voted 5–2 to advance House Bill 25-1137 after adopting two amendments that change how the Colorado Pet Overpopulation Fund is governed and how grant recipients are selected.

The measure, sponsored in committee by Senator Janet Winter, updates CPOF board membership, requires conflict-of-interest recusal, and makes funding rules more flexible. An amendment adopted in committee removes the requirement that 10% of the fund be awarded to trap-neuter-release (TNR) programs; instead the text makes TNR an allowable but optional use. A separate amendment reworked board appointments to expand geographic representation and remove named activist seats, while adding recusal language for board members with conflicts.

Supporters said the bill improves transparency and equitable distribution of grant dollars. \"This represents a long overdue shift towards transparency, accountability, and fairness,\" testified Kira Gala, an animal-welfare advocate. Local TNR providers and small rural clinics told the committee they depend on CPOF grants and warned that changing how funds are distributed could disrupt long-running spay/neuter programs; Stacy Baum of Feline Fix, a Commerce City clinic, urged senators to oppose the bill, saying some small groups were not consulted and that the fund has been essential to their work.

Committee members balanced those concerns with testimony alleging that CPOF had repeatedly funded the same organizations and that no-kill providers or TNR groups were being excluded by an opaque rubric. \"There are organizations that are fighting this bill agree that we do good work,\" said Kathy Gaines, executive director of Max Fund Animal Adoption Center, describing her organization's experience applying for grants and being declined without clear criteria. Multiple witnesses urged stronger public disclosure of past awards and grant scoring.

Committee amendments also clarified that rural organizations could be eligible even if they operate via satellite locations, addressed board composition to add representation from eastern and southern Colorado, and added a recusal requirement. After debate and testimony, Senator Winter moved the bill as amended. The committee adopted the amendments and advanced the measure with a 5–2 vote.

The full bill text and the committee-adopted amendments require CPOF to maintain clearer public information about grant awards and to follow the revised board appointment structure. The committee recorded the vote to advance HB25-1137 as 5 in favor, 2 opposed.

The bill now moves to the next legislative steps, where sponsors and stakeholders expect continued negotiation on reporting and governance details.

Votes at the committee recorded during the hearing included adoption of amendment L0007 (board composition and recusal) and L0008 (optional TNR funding). Senator Winter moved the final recommendation to the committee of the whole; committee tally reported in the hearing was 5–2 to advance the bill as amended.","The Colorado Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee on Thursday advanced legislation to change governance, transparency and allowable uses of the Colorado Pet Overpopulation Fund, adopting amendments that remove a mandatory allocation to TNR programs and expand geographic representation on the fund's board.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6110544,"Senate committee stalls veterinary telemedicine bill; sponsors say access, critics cite diagnosis concerns",331,4869000,5200000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943&start=4869&end=5200","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943/thumbnail_4869000.jpg","/articles/6110544/Colorado/Senate-committee-stalls-veterinary-telemedicine-bill-sponsors-say-access-critics-cite-diagnosis-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110544-ae7863f32bd61741e19c5bd9453357bf/orig.mp4?Expires=1777696788&Signature=DDu~SLkSiEtFITzxvIP4b8eUYdvVLUHZTxsCzTuXCfCqrlD-vpZEHc~2EJ8wIKdFsFZ5cvtNlPOHDwNnL98vH5oCoVOZBwzngkq0kMbYsfQsvsxWJc3LPvlems0o1AnStWYwJyyxpprjAS4yIMTgfyNyiXDkF8pKngtbmzHYjlvt9GJHjPezkj9Z0HOzlUkcrO1KzdtuUlegT38PBjAvrMZXP3KH5V0qFunOlNX9E19kc6P3X-z6GdI4I1CWmQpSmfu5FeA~vm3fJWNG9W~2oq2jy694oaaZJF9ZxVv6d54zpmSDNrmhW1-6HrzEmFxtImmEibUGgVy11ZHK52YGLg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A bill to allow Colorado veterinarians to establish the required veterinary-client-patient relationship (VCPR) through telemedicine failed in the Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee and was then postponed indefinitely.

Senate Bill 159 had broad public support in prior testimony from pet owners and some animal-welfare groups, and sponsors argued the measure would increase veterinarians' ability to serve rural and underserved communities during a documented provider shortage. \"Average Colorado ranks 58 out of 100 for access to veterinary care,\" said a bill co-sponsor in committee, urging the change so licensed Colorado veterinarians could use telemedicine when appropriate.

Committee opponents, including some veterinarians and committee members, said an in-person initial exam remains an important safeguard to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment in animals that cannot directly describe symptoms. After debate, the committee voted 3 in favor and 4 against a motion to send the bill forward. Shortly after, a motion to postpone the measure indefinitely passed on a reverse roll call.

The sponsor said the proposal would not require veterinarians to use telemedicine and would only allow licensed Colorado practitioners discretion to establish relationships remotely; nonetheless, concerns about off-label prescribing and the differences between human and veterinary telehealth persisted. The committee vote effectively ends the bill for the 2025 session, though sponsors said they remain open to continued stakeholder discussions.","Senate Bill 159, which would have allowed Colorado veterinarians to establish veterinary-client-patient relationships via telemedicine, failed on a 3–4 committee vote and was subsequently postponed indefinitely. Sponsors argued telemedicine would expand access amid a veterinary shortage; opponents urged retaining an in-person initial exam.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":46,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6110529,"Committee outcomes: confirmations and bill votes — Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources, March session",4203,276000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943&start=276&end=4479","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943/thumbnail_276000.jpg","/articles/6110529/Colorado/Committee-outcomes-confirmations-and-bill-votes-Senate-Agriculture-Natural-Resources-March-session","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110529-c07dde3f623eaa2a94a35286410e3b2a/orig.mp4?Expires=1777696788&Signature=N1yXzPmebIBKHkQM3kBZz2o6TkJYPtw0qTcAFojLIUDlRYGZDWGEfYFaCMEpU8oN5Kcz-gDveAbA5mZRcNrHt-xUFSElWQ~xIHKqknvJvXVYuQnzrZrECv-wuvgK78nZr54DZvoBuLXHbFfhZ81K4IEhY~lW2sfRbT-hl3O1LSMDNo7MTRJ1Mnn4glXA1AZAYI2xtjy8jFKrTMkc2ZvYWdu7LeBPFopxImFRjkJHTKu9TYoq9twj~dZwJ2HGpL0e22FixL3JxomnQGJ7dA3cM0tM8cZex3JManex58l~pIkETJCIBd8R3juABLjTqXKtdI045FYfu02k227ncfRhIg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee completed its agenda with a series of confirmations and bill actions. Below are the formal outcomes recorded on the committee calendar.

- Confirmations placed on the consent calendar (unanimous):
- Nick Armando — Reappointment, Colorado Coal Mine Board of Examiners (reappointment moved to full Senate with favorable recommendation; committee reported unanimous support and placed appointment on the consent calendar).
- Jill Nelson and Doug Orin — Reappointments, Colorado Mine Land Reclamation Board (committee moved both reappointments to the full Senate with favorable recommendation, unanimous).
- Christine Johnston, Kathy Chandler Henry (listed as Kathleen Chandler Henry in the motion), Jenny Arndt and Julie Zahringer — Appointments/Reappointments, Colorado Water Quality Control Commission (committee voted unanimously to advance and placed appointments on the consent calendar).

- Bills advanced or acted on:
- HB25-1137 (Colorado Pet Overpopulation Fund governance): Advanced to committee of the whole as amended (committee vote 5'to'2). Amendments L0007 and L0008 were adopted in committee; the bill was placed for further consideration at the next stage.
- HB25-1203 (Labeling of cell-cultivated meat): Advanced unanimously to committee of the whole and placed on the consent calendar.
- SB53 (Protection/management of wild bison entering Colorado): Advanced to Appropriations as amended (committee vote 4'to'3). Amendments L001 and L003 were adopted; CPW charged with developing a herd-management plan and continuing tribal consultations.
- SB159 (Veterinary telemedicine / VCPR): Motion to advance failed 3'to'4 and the committee then voted to postpone the bill indefinitely.

Next steps: Confirmations on the consent calendar proceed toward the full Senate. HB25-1137 and HB25-1203 advance to the committee of the whole (HB25-1203 on the consent calendar). SB53 goes to Appropriations for budget and implementation review; CPW is expected to consult with tribal governments while developing the required herd-management plan.","The committee took several formal actions including unanimous confirmation votes on multiple appointments, advancement of bills on cultivated-meat labeling and bison protections, and a failed telemedicine measure. This round-up lists motions, vote tallies and next steps.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6110534,"Committee advances bill to protect wild bison crossing into Colorado; tribes and conservation groups testify",6788,7583000,14371000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943&start=7583&end=14371","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2757673-902da321597d7237baffed1fb7d88943/thumbnail_7583000.jpg","/articles/6110534/Colorado/Committee-advances-bill-to-protect-wild-bison-crossing-into-Colorado-tribes-and-conservation-groups-testify","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110534-e5e00538f8f14b5004955408d9dd06bb/orig.mp4?Expires=1777696788&Signature=YG1jVoNNLjtNnW48uJgxxGvLZ-6tWlsQwmlZXZyiKnPKpYCSqr76uBQDlRgvpM0~cijaAvw7b6xFeDkq4R92plKhJm2NRnVvMyRef08W9xhwQXN1hVaTca5lg0NPBwd80vYtamr5cfVawOYNZMMWHFbv2hSIOxWSP2BOzOJhBwJ2eOUwQOOx0f52LOxPgn30aYgvYGEwiMo7p6Mhziz5LDCbyn6lG7yrHQ-CK99fDuqxBpfvSPeB5OV7wxILStj4eOezUpuNz82vCzPhLIAqd~wpN22GHcKzSX2hVc5i9XCKHpafO1RzxmE3jGh5EMWXXSXbCBMbUnDKpcQiAClyFw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee voted 4'to'3 to advance Senate Bill 53, a bill that would classify wild, free-ranging bison entering Colorado from neighboring states as wildlife and place management authority with Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW).

Sponsor Senator Joann Danielson said the measure responds to concerns from tribal communities and conservation groups after a small number of bison began crossing from Utah into northwest Colorado. \"There are wild bison that are crossing the state border into Colorado from states like Utah where they are protected and then they cross an imaginary line that puts them in Colorado and they're being poached,\" Danielson said in opening remarks.

Tribal leaders, elders and Native youth delivered extensive testimony asking the state to protect bison for cultural, ceremonial and ecological reasons. \"To indigenous communities, this is corruption. This is disrespect,\" said Daisy Bluestar, a Native tribal member who drove from Ignacio to testify. Multiple tribal representatives asked that bison associated with tribal herds remain classified as livestock when those animals are owned and managed by tribes; the bill's amendments explicitly exclude tribal-owned conservation herds from the new wildlife classification.

Conservation organizations and hunting groups also spoke in favor of the measure, urging CPW to manage wild bison with the same conservation tools used for elk and deer. Department officials testified they supported the bill concept but asked for additional statutory detail and more time to develop a thorough herd-management plan. CPW and Department of Natural Resources staff sought language to allow the commission to set license fees and to increase penalties for illegal take; the committee adopted a set of sponsor amendments (L001 and L003) that were negotiated with tribal representatives and other stakeholders.

Opposition came from some northwest Colorado local governments and agricultural representatives concerned about grazing competition, fence damage and disease risk. CPW witnesses said testing to date had not detected brucellosis or Mycoplasma bovis in the Book Cliffs subherd; the agency proposed a later effective date to allow time for a public management plan.

After debate the committee voted 4'to'3 to advance the bill to the Appropriations Committee as amended. Sponsors emphasized the bill seeks to stop unregulated poaching of transient wild animals and create a public, science-based management process under CPW rather than leaving the animals unprotected.

The bill now moves to appropriations, where budget and rulemaking timing will be considered; the committee also encouraged CPW to continue government-to-government consultation with affected tribes during plan development.","Senate Bill 53, which would treat wild, free-ranging bison that enter Colorado from Utah as wildlife subject to Colorado Parks & Wildlife management, advanced out of committee 4'to'3 after hours of tribal, conservation and local testimony. The bill includes amendments addressing tribal concerns and a requirement for a CPW herd management plan.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Committee advances bill requiring clear labels for lab-grown meat; sponsors say consumers deserve to know

Senate committee backs overhaul of Colorado Pet Overpopulation Fund, removes TNR mandate and alters board makeup

Senate committee stalls veterinary telemedicine bill; sponsors say access, critics cite diagnosis concerns

Committee outcomes: confirmations and bill votes — Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources, March session

Committee advances bill to protect wild bison crossing into Colorado; tribes and conservation groups testify