[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6110061,"mediaKeyId","2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285","parentId",2759079,"title","House approves born-alive survivors bill after heated floor debate and clarifying amendments","audioSeconds",3748,"startMs",5790000,"endMs",9538000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285&start=5790&end=9538","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285/thumbnail_5790000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6110061/Missouri/House-approves-born-alive-survivors-bill-after-heated-floor-debate-and-clarifying-amendments","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110061-d207a25aeb3b22be2d6f5d80687e06af/orig.mp4?Expires=1775621607&Signature=aRqpJ~SU5Jqwdvg-R52DFyXJkPPzuggJlPvudBpsyr9DWCdJIEjQRK-NUKsD8fc3MCgGVQb3Najc4wUtbWJTiZwM1sqHQSCDLRK~CgqNN-K3AFoy04wAqrx82gU8UELR0JdGmblVyVYHXF~KeXBrm68Klc3AOXISlijdMR6wJmuJRIwHDvlpIOj3Ro6tS0fYvurOB9mVKMGqU7PYZ0WWC1lpzGXt~v0ZOtpM3Hpqk~wj1FfU4yJA9tLU79DM-xo~2X6QAZTMmEob97xMlaK5P4eXMFw7gt1t8eVB0FeJt~xgG6UYr1nwKfGB4jv3hf2in085eH4laAmephEatpxyLg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Missouri Legislature","date","2025-03-24T00:00:00Z","article","The Missouri House on March 19 adopted a committee substitute for House Bills 195 and 1119 that requires medical care for infants born alive during or after an abortion or attempted abortion, directing that such infants “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as reasonably diligent and conscientious health care providers would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age.”

The sponsor, Gentleman from Taney, a representative, described the bill as focused on “children born alive” after abortive procedures and said the measure affirms that a live-born infant is entitled to the same protections and medical care as any newborn. The sponsor removed one disputed subsection on the floor through an amendment he said addressed concerns raised in committee.

Floor debate became heated and at times personal. Critics — including medical professionals and other members who said they had worked in health care — argued the bill was redundant to existing criminal and professional-liability law, risked criminalizing clinicians and could undermine care decisions in complicated medical situations. The Lady from Boone, a nurse and committee member, said the measure could “criminalize my profession, including anybody that is licensed, registered, or certified in the state as a health care provider” and noted the bill lacked definitions distinguishing spontaneous miscarriages from induced abortions.

Supporters said the bill responds to documented instances in other states where infants born alive reportedly were not provided full medical care after a termination attempt. One supporter recounted the Gosnell prosecution as an example of extreme misconduct; a floor sponsor cited a February 2024 tally of “at least 277 known cases of infants born alive following an abortion” while acknowledging reporting is incomplete because states do not consistently collect the data.

The House adopted a clarifying amendment that removed language the sponsor acknowledged raised concerns and then accepted a second set of clarifying changes (an amendment to the amendment) that adjusted wrongful-death and damages language to focus actions on the pregnant person and immediate family rights rather than adding broader categories that had been questioned in debate.

Several members noted the constitutional and statutory context. Some speakers said federal law already recognizes infants born alive as persons; others said Amendment 3 to the Missouri Constitution (adopted by voters) had created statutory ambiguity that warranted reaffirmation in state code. The Lady from Saint Louis City referenced existing state statues (citing an Infants Protection Act section) and said the state need not repeatedly restate the same protections; proponents disputed that point and pressed for an explicit state statute.

Procedural outcome: the House adopted the substitute and perfected it for printing. The perfection/printing vote was recorded as 107 ayes and 42 nays.

Clarifying details added on the floor included a carve-out to avoid criminalizing physicians acting to save the life of the mother or the newborn in emergency situations and adjusted language about which relatives may bring wrongful-death actions. Sponsors said their goal was to ensure a live-born infant receives an opportunity for life-saving care and that the statute would apply to any infant who is born alive regardless of the underlying reason for the delivery.

Ending: The House approved the committee substitute after a full hour of floor debate and several clarifying amendments; supporters said passage reaffirms the obligation to treat infants born alive, while critics warned of professional-liability risk and potential overlap with existing law.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","2025 Legislative Session - Day Forty One March 24","oneSentenceSummary","The Missouri House adopted a committee substitute for House Bills 195 and 1119 on March 19 that requires infants born alive during or after an abortion attempt to receive the same degree of professional medical care as any other newborn of comparable gestational age.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature MO, Missouri","taxId",77693,"location","Missouri","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6110065,"House adopts changes to initiative-petition rules; votes narrow circulator standards and timing",2058,3614000,5672000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285&start=3614&end=5672","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285/thumbnail_3614000.jpg","/articles/6110065/Missouri/House-adopts-changes-to-initiative-petition-rules-votes-narrow-circulator-standards-and-timing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110065-85faf824e863e654da1501911178f9f0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775621607&Signature=o9WdiHkOsvR1iNMY7hnjzj8WLweHeTx5Wgg2w6NH2C~psmvMFVqC8Mwpkle6y9~ipQO7UBQ4p-4VbEYreDUZoM-VRTGkjFKc6U8VDoBOZC6oYAXQt1gyFWvslXGzS8Kqvc3IRbx58FM6ny-O~PLJftr6hE2ckCUm~NSVgRpaJSnpjYKVPjbIID~Lq6x2EfyrKcj63K3HdjFuw7hrbR-bz0PYpHBSVLMvZNsI1PpJRtt2Fg9Sh~~axKzoRKhdmK3wEF3v6H1j1Uyy2hrMM4y8HZf0i-ioXBoZcw7c7csLYicvyAqsE6LUr5ltzzr7TMMTb1V-PtqoJg0tCXiExhRmEQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Missouri House on March 19 adopted a House Committee Substitute that combines House Bills 575 and 551 and revises rules for initiative and referendum petitions, including how circulators are qualified and paid, who may challenge petitions in court and when sufficiency is determined.

The bill sponsor, the Gentleman from Franklin, a representative, said the measure standardizes the process so the Secretary of State’s office and courts can process petitions consistently and aligns circulator residency requirements with a cited Eighth Circuit precedent. He said the substitute also prohibits paying petition circulators on a per-signature basis and moves key sufficiency determinations earlier in the timeline so circulators and sponsors know sooner whether a petition will meet ballot requirements.

The House debated two floor amendments aimed at greater transparency and clearer warnings for circulators. The Gentleman from Clay offered an amendment to add plain-language qualifications to the circulator affidavit so signers would explicitly acknowledge the new statutory requirements; Clay argued the change would reduce future litigation. The sponsor opposed the amendment, saying the affidavit is already busy and that experienced circulators should know statutory duties. The Clay amendment failed when the House voted it down by voice (no recorded roll call).

A second amendment from the Gentleman from Saint Louis proposed a statutory requirement that local election authorities provide public notice of changes affecting voters (the amendment sponsor emphasized transparency). The bill sponsor and other floor leaders objected on logistics and cost grounds; the amendment failed on the floor.

Supporters said the bill brings Missouri’s initiative process into alignment with court precedent and curbs the practice of per-signature pay, which they said has generated controversy. Opponents argued some provisions—most notably a change to require challengers to be Missouri registered voters and tightened circulator residency terms—raise constitutional concerns and could limit access to judicial relief. The Gentleman from Clay and other critics repeatedly warned the “registered voter” standing requirement is an unusual restriction and could invite litigation.

Procedurally, the House twice approved a motion to close debate and proceed; the previous-question motion on the substitute passed on a roll-call vote of 100 ayes to 44 nays. The House then adopted the committee substitute by voice vote.

Key provisions adopted in the committee substitute include (as described on the floor): a prohibition on per-signature payment to circulators, a residency/registration threshold for circulators and challengers (text requires individuals to meet certain in-state residency periods and in some challenge contexts to be Missouri registered voters), and timeline adjustments to resolve sufficiency questions earlier in the process. The transcript indicates the substitute keeps payment to circulators permissible in the form of compensation but not on a per-signature basis.

Lawmakers debated whether the changes would reduce fraud and confusion or whether they would impose burdens on grassroots, volunteer efforts to gather signatures. The sponsor said the changes would make the process “cleaner” and more efficient; critics argued that the changes risk constitutional challenges and may shift costs to county election authorities.

Ending: The House adopted the committee substitute and perfected the bill for printing. Two transparency-focused floor amendments aimed at expanding affidavit language and imposing explicit public-notice burdens on election authorities were rejected by the House.","The Missouri House adopted a committee substitute for House Bills 575 and 551 on March 19 that changes initiative-petition procedures, including limits on per-signature pay for circulators, residency/registration thresholds, and earlier sufficiency determinations.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6110071,"Missouri House advances comprehensive school-safety bill with training, locks and stop-the-bleed kits",2554,955000,3509000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285&start=955&end=3509","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2759079-1cd6904ae88f8f8bb93f00329d792285/thumbnail_955000.jpg","/articles/6110071/Missouri/Missouri-House-advances-comprehensive-school-safety-bill-with-training-locks-and-stop-the-bleed-kits","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6110071-1ec99195ee6782befb0acd436be6f351/orig.mp4?Expires=1775621607&Signature=LepgcobUkP9pLMIHZjli2szT5C2VjkJzXLplyHm~UPrQCu5G2aal1OXF27HkN6~k-4gBa5jRn9SrHpEamaNjIuJ8z0rHRx7vrTMdFw6ba5rQ2VRU-HLa8Kt53xqJNPTC4X-YALe-oIFf8sZK-YE2vm~NIx6uSzFpmDfU4UT4bMby9IBVYMDvK~JlDE~mPUZTotxinTRCieuIgBy14vVPo~ssLM-2vIL~~epvE78m9OvGUEDU-kK7q0fIlT9LZDjnunYz6wSYg0LRrYYzoyNA1uXHjXP82YFuzP-Bf~60sgxbdU-N2vc7nthR4t~iOpH0fk88aTf6~pDOQxDBnHqW2Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","House Bill 416, a package of school-safety measures that requires districts to adopt emergency plans, adds staff training requirements and mandates certain equipment, was ordered perfected by the Missouri House on March 19, 2025.

The bill’s sponsor, Lady from Buchanan, a representative, told colleagues HB 416 “focuses on training, personnel, planning, equipment, risk assessment, mental health, and equipping the school from both internal and external threats.” She listed 12 components the bill would require, including annual physical site assessments, stop-the-bleed kits, a second school-safety coordinator, anti-intruder interior locks and training tied to FEMA or Missouri School Boards Association courses.

Supporters said the measure packages proven, practical steps to make students and staff safer. Opponents and some committee members warned about labeling students through behavioral-risk tracking and about unfunded costs for facility upgrades.

Lawmakers adopted three floor amendments before perfecting the bill. The Gentleman from Randolph, a representative and amendment sponsor, added a provision restricting student use of cell phones during instructional time while preserving local school-board control for instructional uses; he said the committee’s version carved out exceptions for students with disabilities or individualized education programs. The Lady from Cass, a representative, offered an amendment to require AED awareness and training and noted many high schools already teach CPR; that amendment passed. The House also adopted an amendment to fix a drafting error in the bill’s line numbering.

The House heard multiple points of clarification before the vote. The Lady from Boone asked whether certain physical upgrades for existing buildings would be required immediately; the sponsor responded that features like bullet-resistant windows and anti-intruder locks would be required only for new construction unless the General Assembly appropriated funds. The Gentleman from Pulaski raised repeated concerns about the language that would require behavioral-risk assessments to follow students when they transfer schools; he argued the provision risked creating a lasting stigma and asked whether the bill’s language could force family interventions. The sponsor and other backers said the bill allows local policies and limits such requirements to supports, not automatic mandates.

The body also debated training requirements. The sponsor and others clarified that the bill sets the trainer qualification (the people who would teach intruder response) at an eight-hour standard while allowing local districts to incorporate the training into their schedules. The Gentleman from Saint Louis recounted running community stop-the-bleed trainings, noting kits and training saved lives in other emergencies.

Procedural outcome: lawmakers approved the previous-question motion and then ordered House Bill 416, as amended, perfected and printed. The previous-question vote was recorded as 109 ayes and 45 nays.

The bill does not itself appropriate money to pay for many of the physical upgrades it describes; sponsors said the requirements for items like anti-intruder locks or film on windows would apply to new construction or only if the legislature funds implementation. Several members pressed the sponsor to provide cost estimates and implementation timelines for districts that lack local funding.

Supporters said the bill pairs physical hardening with behavioral supports and reporting tools, including a requirement that prosecutors report certain violent charges to schools within 24 hours so schools can make temporary placement decisions. The bill would also require annual employee intruder-response training and age-appropriate publicity about “Courage to Report,” a Missouri Highway Patrol anonymous-tip hotline.

Lawmakers left several details for local policy (for example, how districts stage phone-use policies and how they implement training schedules), but the House’s action moves the measure closer to final consideration. The bill was ordered perfected and printed for further floor processing.

Ending: The House adopted the measure as amended and sent the perfected version to the next procedural step. Sponsors emphasized training, mental-health supports and stop-the-bleed readiness as central goals; dissenters urged clearer limits on behavioral records and funding guarantees.","House members ordered House Bill 416 perfected after debate and several amendments that add a cell-phone restriction during instructional time, requirements for stop-the-bleed kits and AED familiarity, and clarified trainer requirements for intruder response training.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

House approves born-alive survivors bill after heated floor debate and clarifying amendments

House adopts changes to initiative-petition rules; votes narrow circulator standards and timing

Missouri House advances comprehensive school-safety bill with training, locks and stop-the-bleed kits