Waterville citizens propose bridge lease to ODOT amid costly demolition plan

During a recent government meeting in Waterville, Ohio, city officials discussed two significant topics that could impact local residents: a new energy program and the future of a historic bridge.

The meeting opened with a discussion about the city's recent opt-in energy program, which allows residents to benefit from a green energy option. Voters approved this initiative in February, enabling residents to automatically participate unless they choose to opt out. The standard rate for this program is set at 9.75%, with an option for a 25% green energy plan available at a slightly higher rate of 9.89%. City officials emphasized that this program simplifies energy management for residents, allowing them to save money without needing to actively engage in market comparisons. However, some residents expressed interest in exploring additional savings through competitive comparisons, highlighting a divide between those who prefer convenience and those willing to invest time for potential savings.

The second major topic involved the future of a bridge in the area, which is slated for demolition by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) at a cost of $4.1 million. A local grassroots group, led by citizen Dave Weber, has proposed alternative solutions that could save the city significant funds. Weber reported that ODOT is open to discussions and has indicated a willingness to transfer the bridge to the city if it expresses interest. He suggested that Waterville could lease the bridge for a nominal fee, allowing for community use while avoiding the high costs associated with demolition. Weber's proposal includes safety measures to protect recreational users, such as signage and barriers, to mitigate liability concerns.

The discussions reflect a broader concern among residents about fiscal responsibility and community engagement in local governance. As the city considers these proposals, the outcomes could shape Waterville's energy landscape and preserve a piece of its historical infrastructure. The council is expected to deliberate further on these matters in upcoming meetings, with community input playing a crucial role in the decision-making process.