Rockwall County disapproves River Rock Trails development due to water and safety concerns

The Rockwall County Commissioners Court convened on March 25, 2025, to address several pressing issues, primarily focusing on the preliminary plat applications for the River Rock Trails development. The court's discussions highlighted significant concerns regarding water supply, fire protection agreements, and compliance with local regulations.

A key point of contention arose over the water supply commitments from Blackland Water Supply and the North Texas Municipal Water District. Officials expressed doubts about the adequacy of the water supply, which was stated to be 302,490 gallons per year, translating to approximately 824,223 gallons daily. Concerns were raised that this volume may not sufficiently support the proposed development, particularly given the anticipated improvements that have yet to be completed.

Additionally, the court discussed the absence of a fire protection agreement between the developer and the city of McClendon Chisholm, which was deemed critical for ensuring public safety. The court emphasized its responsibility to uphold the health and safety standards of the community, indicating that without proper fire protection measures, the development could pose risks to residents.

The court ultimately voted to disapprove the preliminary plat applications for phases 1A and 1B of the River Rock Trails development, citing non-compliance with several local government regulations, including inadequate access to water and failure to meet open space requirements. The motions to disapprove were passed unanimously, reflecting the court's commitment to thorough regulatory compliance and community welfare.

In a related discussion, the court also addressed the preliminary plat for a wastewater treatment plant associated with the River Rock Trails project. Similar concerns regarding compliance with local regulations and the implications of placing a treatment facility within a floodplain were raised. The court again voted to disapprove this application, reinforcing the need for adherence to safety and environmental standards.

As the meeting progressed, the court acknowledged the need for clearer procedures regarding appeals related to infrastructure apportionment determinations, as developers have expressed intentions to contest the county's decisions. The court plans to establish formal procedures to handle such appeals, marking a significant step in addressing the complexities of development in the county.

Overall, the meeting underscored the county's dedication to ensuring that new developments meet stringent safety and regulatory standards, prioritizing the health and welfare of its residents.