Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Connecticut limits security deposits for tenants under and over sixty-two years old

March 25, 2025 | House Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Connecticut Legislation Bills, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Connecticut limits security deposits for tenants under and over sixty-two years old
On March 25, 2025, the Connecticut State Legislature introduced House Bill 6839, a significant piece of legislation aimed at reforming security deposit regulations for tenants, particularly those operating licensed child care homes. The bill seeks to address the financial burdens faced by tenants, especially seniors and child care providers, by establishing clearer guidelines on security deposits.

One of the key provisions of House Bill 6839 stipulates that landlords cannot demand a security deposit exceeding two months' rent for tenants under the age of sixty-two. For tenants aged sixty-two and older, the cap is set at one month's rent. This change is designed to alleviate financial strain on older tenants, who may be on fixed incomes. Additionally, if a tenant becomes sixty-two after paying a higher security deposit, they are entitled to a refund of the excess amount upon request.

The bill also includes a provision for tenants who operate licensed family child care homes or group child care homes. In these cases, landlords may demand a security deposit that exceeds the two-month limit, recognizing the unique financial dynamics of running a child care business.

Another notable aspect of the bill is the introduction of a new provision allowing operators of licensed child care homes to name their landlords as additional insured parties in their renter's or homeowner's insurance policies. This change, effective July 1, 2025, aims to provide additional protection for landlords while ensuring that child care operators can secure necessary insurance coverage.

Debate surrounding House Bill 6839 has focused on the balance between protecting tenants and ensuring landlords can maintain their properties. Some lawmakers have expressed concerns that the provisions may discourage landlords from renting to certain demographics, while others argue that the bill is a necessary step toward fair housing practices.

The implications of this legislation are significant, particularly for the child care sector in Connecticut, which has faced challenges in recent years. By easing financial burdens on child care providers, the bill could help stabilize this essential service, which is crucial for working families.

As the legislative process continues, stakeholders from various sectors, including housing advocates and child care providers, are closely monitoring the bill's progress. The outcome of House Bill 6839 could set a precedent for future housing legislation in Connecticut, reflecting the state's commitment to supporting both tenants and the vital child care industry.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Connecticut articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI