[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6624024,"mediaKeyId","2768877-2b4255c9001003ddca9b87068fbd22fa","parentId",2768877,"title","Votes at a glance: Rogers County commissioners approve transfers, equipment sales; tabling and rebids set for facility project","audioSeconds",2116,"startMs",94000,"endMs",2210000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2768877-2b4255c9001003ddca9b87068fbd22fa&start=94&end=2210","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2768877-2b4255c9001003ddca9b87068fbd22fa/thumbnail_94000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6624024/Rogers-County/Oklahoma/Votes-at-a-glance-Rogers-County-commissioners-approve-transfers-equipment-sales-tabling-and-rebids-set-for-facility-project","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6624024-ccbc5b91da6c5be8927e344627c88829/orig.mp4?Expires=1775253890&Signature=CmWMxYVC1sdUe~6ofok9f7D9I-qm95Fey2S-dpWyIkhYRShnNqSP6pbOUjZ6flnD-E9tfqU2vVEcziLPJrSUjVsYicNFPD13g8nyYql0~reT4Kgz137OQKILAB4nB~twAWFxsAooa0XRRs1RW5-BIkrNekRv8ABU8TKInmUqipuQ8rhZA2E9L03ynFoD4l49g9jCXv1-~GlV-Tl4z-b3KAly6s6nQB-svQyRxAqdH-6e8NQpndrnhVvncfwFOztA3R6ypdc7g5TVbaudRKCsQRLWeVokkpk~a-sPK7J6giBx0Ih9~lXIPzThYfI8UecEy-TOA2wHxJC4vLx4Hs9jHQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Rogers County, OK","date","2025-03-24T00:00:00Z","article","The Rogers County Board of County Commissioners took a series of actions March 24, approving payroll and transfers, accepting results of an equipment sale, tabling several bid packages and directing rebids on portions of a facility maintenance expansion project.

Key outcomes

- Minutes: The board approved minutes for the March 17 regular meeting by recorded motion. Recorded votes included Commissioner Delosier: Aye; (another commissioner recorded as Hendrix/Hendricks on roll calls in the transcript).

- Final plat: The board approved the final plat for RRE MRB Industrial (Manhattan Road and Bridge) for property at 5503 East 580 Road in Catoosa; Planning Board had recommended approval 4–0. Motion carried with recorded votes Delosier: Aye; Hendricks: Aye.

- Disposal of county equipment: The board approved disposal/sale results from the Elk City sale for District 2 items, including the sale of a 2012 asphalt zipper, loaders, mowers and other equipment. Example results recorded in the meeting transcript: 2012 asphalt zipper sold to Gwen Thrasher for $14,720; JK 724 loader with forks sold to Anadarko Dozer for $115,500; other items sold to named buyers, with totals reported in meeting record. Motion to approve disposal carried.

- Bids tabled: The board tabled the March 24 bid openings for the Sheriff’s firearms range electrical work (bid package 2025-530) and for hot mix/asphalt/emulsion supplies (three-month bid), each for one week to allow preparation of spreadsheets and further review. Recorded vote to table the electric bid: Delosier: Aye; Hendricks: Aye.

- Facility maintenance expansion bids: For the Rogers County facility maintenance building expansion project, commissioners struck two bid packages outright (902 — flooring; 1002 — lockers) and approved rebidding two other packages (12-01 — appliances; 23-01 — HVAC). The board left asphalt paving under consideration and on hold pending further legal/administrative review. Motion to strike the two packages and to rebid appliances and HVAC carried.

- Cooperative agreement to enter private property: The board approved a cooperative agreement with Cynthia Bauer to enter private property to remove trees and shape a ditch for drainage pursuant to Oklahoma Statute Title 69.

- Transfers and payroll: The board approved several transfers, including $17,000 from general government salaries to insurance/benefits for unemployment expenses, $19,803.72 from sheriff fee accounts into sheriff maintenance and operations to repay grants, $200,000 from jail salaries into jail maintenance and operations for year-end adjustments, and $20,500 into visual inspection salaries for March 2025. The board also approved March payroll and 47 blanket purchase orders totaling $80,825.

- Resolution concerning 14234 South 4237 Road: The board adopted a resolution stating the property at 14234 South 4237 Road is outside the jurisdiction of the Claremore-Rogers County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission and that Rogers County has no objection to an existing well located approximately 14.5 feet west of the road pavement. The resolution references a dedication deed filed May 13, 1997, and notes the well has been in use about 27 years; motion to approve the resolution carried.

Record of motions and votes

The meeting transcript includes recorded aye votes in multiple approvals (examples above). Several actions were approved by motion and recorded as “motion carried.” Some tabling and rebidding decisions were made to allow additional evaluation and to avoid changing bid scope after proposals had been submitted.

Next steps

County staff will proceed with the approved transfers and disposals; the Clerk’s Office will republish rebid packages for appliances and HVAC and will return the tabled bids to the board for action after the requested spreadsheet/review. The resolution regarding the well is intended to resolve a title/financing issue reported by FHA during a title examination for the property purchase.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","03/24/2025 BOCC","oneSentenceSummary","At its March 24 meeting the Rogers County Board of County Commissioners approved multiple routine items including transfers, equipment disposals and a resolution about a well; it also struck and rebid parts of a facility expansion project and tabled several bids for one week.","taxTitle","Rogers County, Oklahoma","taxId",69043,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6624028,"Rogers County commissioners deny rezoning request for 1.46-acre lot in Claremore area",1742,305000,2047000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2768877-2b4255c9001003ddca9b87068fbd22fa&start=305&end=2047","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2768877-2b4255c9001003ddca9b87068fbd22fa/thumbnail_305000.jpg","/articles/6624028/Rogers-County/Oklahoma/Rogers-County-commissioners-deny-rezoning-request-for-146-acre-lot-in-Claremore-area","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6624028-28af8129d134cbb05271cb4d50e0a814/orig.mp4?Expires=1775253890&Signature=V651W-tmdrS5QXQjLxE0xnkeMmAOdB7lS4xRGdhegSrszcTt9hJD5IN1M6VCQ0k0b4tX3o1fXgqNa6b1H89L63Sca6mlbYSwcBYlQ94-86~Nc2aV59XkpgA42WspgjV-OIIlHYVzgcJZPDEDj1w6f-OtekkKxZwbTtlNAVflZ-VXZwr-l44RqLHf~jRU5-9ofQdRfjljc0LBasHhlu5pnGreUbRdaveSEpM0x6NwXpeWjXXxiA-zSPgdTL354emFxKYyfnPbRjadEd0dLyyoIrg95dLel35nFVA2hcMfFxO9qNVg3qypV~6fyGq3gWMDkSQWEKyHB7ZmXVRDHABujQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Rogers County Board of County Commissioners denied a request to rezone 1.46 acres from AG (agricultural) to RST-60 on property at 15901 South 4100 Road in the Claremore area, following a public hearing March 24.

The request, filed as case 2605 by applicant Brady Begley, would have allowed a lot split so an existing manufactured home on the parcel could be on a separate 1.46-acre lot. The Planning Commission had a split recommendation, 2–2, on the zoning change before it reached the commissioners.

The hearing drew multiple nearby residents who urged denial, citing concerns about setting a precedent for smaller lots and mobile-home development along the road and potential public-health and drainage impacts. “Approving this zoning change sets a dangerous precedent, opening the floodgates for similar developments in our area,” said Gabriel Rosainz, a nearby resident, during public comment. Rosainz said the change would “alter the character of the community and negatively impact property value.”

Several speakers raised technical concerns about sewer and groundwater. Ken Clark, who described shallow soil and limited absorption near his property, warned that adding many homes in the area could overwhelm septic systems and create standing sewage issues: “If you put 35 homes up there on a very limited area, you've got a problem…we're gonna turn into a cesspool.” Ruby Stauner, a nearby resident, said she already experiences odors from a neighbor’s aerobic system and worried multiple systems would worsen air quality.

Applicant Brady Begley said the split was a family matter: he said his father is deeding the 1.46-acre parcel to him so the family can live there and that an existing manufactured home has been on the land about five years. “I am going to own it,” Begley told commissioners, adding he had already begun deed paperwork and spent money on the process. Property owner Jeff Beckley said the lot was a family gift and that he planned to sell the broader property in the future.

County staff explained the legal reason for requiring rezoning: splits that create tracts smaller than 10 acres must be zoned RST-60 rather than remain AG. Staff also noted that if the owner instead conveyed 10-acre tracts, such splits would not require a zoning change and would not come before the county for approval.

Commissioners emphasized the risk of setting a precedent. After public comment and discussion, a motion to deny the zoning change passed; recorded votes included Commissioner Delosier: Aye; Commissioner Hendricks: Aye. The denial leaves the property zoned AG; any future lot splits below 10 acres would still require zoning review.

The Planning Commission’s split vote and the extent of public testimony were central to the discussion. The board did not approve any alternate conditions at the March 24 meeting. The applicant and opponents were informed of the denial and of the existing options discussed by staff (for example, conveying 10-acre tracts).

The denial means no zoning change was adopted and no additional approvals were granted for new housing beyond the existing, long-standing manufactured home on the property.","After a public hearing with several residents raising concerns about septic systems, precedent and property values, the Rogers County Board of County Commissioners voted to deny a request to rezone 1.46 acres from AG to RST-60 to allow a lot split for an existing manufactured home.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Rogers County commissioners approve transfers, equipment sales; tabling and rebids set for facility project

Rogers County commissioners deny rezoning request for 1.46-acre lot in Claremore area