[{"_1":2,"_135":-5,"_136":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111,123],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6276019,"mediaKeyId","2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9","parentId",2767278,"title","Votes at a glance: Citrus County Board actions March 25, 2025","audioSeconds",92,"startMs",2058000,"endMs",2150000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9&start=2058&end=2150","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9/thumbnail_2058000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6276019/Citrus-County/Florida/Votes-at-a-glance-Citrus-County-Board-actions-March-25-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6276019-3c1f53c9f87c36e0b9416185697927e5/orig.mp4?Expires=1771151755&Signature=AyBRD8ZmzAjWxJ0ILDMUO-2EvdUCdMZyyNerz-lfgdeT9lgA69SrKwfue7B2gUpwVv0gup0IfIxY9oM7e4U~aaZeXUwsvGazCBfz5zY3Um~SK0L~IHbJ3~adlOnrNYegd8q~ZUpGtEi8cOs7ZQpSfDHXpHaB2WMKPw7nvfEHOP3oMyh5ntwYnI~XjYXy9m5wo2H0rZSvEtBjtbs7nomb3QALEK6kWBmxFedqZGtXwPc4bnWtWitS7TgLFgH6d7DJ2BKpiMqEssgqpeVh0Aoj9-YPDMk9dRxxjmg5iyfIsBNzSZsCvJx1qWdVsA9N8PFZBWln1dL9H7tnQ-SqGx2MFw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Citrus County, FL","date","2025-03-26T00:35:30.827Z","article","At its March 25 meeting, the Citrus County Board of County Commissioners approved several routine consent and land-use items as well as an uncontested establishment of a community development district (CDD). The meeting also recorded award proclamations and appointments.

Highlights and outcomes

- Davis Reserve community development district (Agenda item H3): Opened to public hearing and approved. Vote recorded: 5-0. The county's Growth Management staff presented the item; no public comment was offered.

- Consent and procurement items (E1A through E15 and related agenda items): Multiple items on the consent agenda and E-series were approved by voice votes; numerous E items recorded unanimous approval (motions carried 5-0 in the transcript for E-series items). The board approved contracts, procurements and routine county business as presented on the consent agenda.

- Advisory board appointments: The board confirmed three veterans advisory board nominees by voice vote; motion carried 5-0.

Why it matters: These routine approvals advance permitting, contracting and administrative work with unanimous or near-unanimous support, while setting the stage for other substantive agenda items.

Ending: The board adjourned after completing the business and scheduling an attorney-client session on April 8 on a pending land-use litigation matter; multiple items were forwarded to staff for follow-up and implementation as recorded in departmental action lists.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Citrus County Board of County Commissioners - March 25, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The board approved multiple consent items, recognized financial awards, established a CDD for Davis Reserve and approved several contracts and leases. Key votes included a 5-0 approval of a Davis Reserve community development district, multiple consent items passed unanimously and advisory board appointments were confirmed.","taxTitle","Citrus County, Florida","taxId",12756,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6276024,"Former Citrus County firefighter describes health crisis, disputes workers' compensation and benefit denials",180,4230000,4410000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9&start=4230&end=4410","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9/thumbnail_4230000.jpg","/articles/6276024/Citrus-County/Florida/Former-Citrus-County-firefighter-describes-health-crisis-disputes-workers-compensation-and-benefit-denials","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6276024-d678cdc392511ac5ab78437467b002bc/orig.mp4?Expires=1771151755&Signature=ai~qNLKGI3H61PQeWH~UQvifSh6ObANOoYxSmLfaLx2iHO1Ct2YBmftMudsi2qzZTuhlGSfhoLbV81I6VddJX6hC7KdvSk3xKqq1KasD71zewMdPDaWxyziAx0WmzmsKE0WzrZTp0r0fVQr2JutEHQZwWgCMiD4xj96SKhszYmqbRgK3t6Sgpioyfq6vdFElBvinisLWyh4lPq~c4rtqi~w-ae2W5iCFu6J3JYSgrWyY0cdzg5xLahIYIDgkR3vbcnQr1BaycrCAaaa-nHzQnIPAMZ6Wf5ibQ0lgQ51VX0HDT~MmLk0XavPcraqKyZkMeztzVzLoDI5dYUN5z8Hv-g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Jonathan Hogerheide, a former Citrus County firefighter and EMT, addressed the board in public comment on March 25, describing a medical crisis he says began after a workplace ankle injury and culminated in open-heart surgery.

Hogerheide said he developed blood clots and pulmonary embolisms in April 2023 and later was found to have clots in his right leg and lungs. He told commissioners he believes the condition is related to his work in the fire service and that his workers' compensation claim was denied on the basis of an autoimmune condition. He said doctors later found clots in his right leg and lungs and that he developed a heart condition that required surgery. He described high monthly medication costs and said the county and his employer stopped his health insurance while he was hospitalized. \"I am not upset about being fired. I am upset that they have pulled the rug underneath my feet,\" Hogerheide said.

He also said he was denied the state \"heart and lung\" benefit, which he described as unavailable because the workers' compensation process did not link his clots to a work cause to the satisfaction of the insurer or program administrator.

Why it matters: Commissioners heard a detailed personal account of an injury, subsequent complications and alleged administrative denials; Hogerheide asked the board to look into how first-responder injuries and benefits were handled.

Ending: Hogerheide concluded his remarks by urging the board to \"stop disrespecting our first responders.\" No formal action or response occurred at the time; the board did not record any immediate direction to staff in the meeting minutes. Commissioners and staff may follow up through existing personnel, legal and workers' compensation channels outside the public meeting record.

","A former firefighter/EMT told commissioners he suffered pulmonary embolisms and a heart condition after a workplace injury, accused the department of cutting his insurance while he was hospitalized and said he had been denied benefits including the state Heart-and-Lung program.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6276027,"Residents and commissioners press for clearer water-quality monitoring after manatee, fish deaths",623,8711000,9334000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9&start=8711&end=9334","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9/thumbnail_8711000.jpg","/articles/6276027/Citrus-County/Florida/Residents-and-commissioners-press-for-clearer-water-quality-monitoring-after-manatee-fish-deaths","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6276027-c5f1f395dc4a87e6b78d05fdd93ef023/orig.mp4?Expires=1771151755&Signature=RlCXax7~gqXD3Fh3iebJffieT94kn18ZpdsnBzQN6IqdAp28d0miLXMuqA4nXSRZNy-oDPYf190Pq1g44OP0K3DcOLwdt7zx001ZWDr2CQ~7LIZaUh1MYPu7bjKNhtXWerTF58mxwEh08lb6C-uDz3gDapH5njDqeCI6lKEvxik1cIKsIqoAIg5vtAASAIZPDHBQqZ5kdK7fJEW8WWmI0wxRvCs6kefE9EOOlp6lC44vOnVdX7gNK2Hi0dWx9Puz5LVNWzDSrdDgK2s7w6Sj7rvPbr6segNBekl9IgiuNBeHIK-kAkHM8g9YLAql2yUPFc8nJj~~0bk427QnDzeXdQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Public comment and board discussion on March 25 focused on recent fish kills and manatee deaths in area rivers and the county's tools to monitor and respond.

Terry Webbernelas, speaking during open comment, asked why county permitting and enforcement had not prevented erosion and flooding linked to paths and road work in Inverness Village 4. Her remarks raised questions about whether the county had the right permits in place for work in rights-of-way and whether missing permits had contributed to localized flooding.

Later in the meeting, several speakers and commissioners discussed a spate of manatee and fish deaths. \"We need feedback to our constituents,\" said Skategg Bob, a local environmental advocate, who urged the county to require more meaningful water testing than the limited dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity and temperature measures that were taken by some agencies at affected sites. Skategg Bob recommended testing for microbial contaminants, nitrates/nitrites, pesticides (including glyphosate) and heavy metals as part of a public monitoring protocol.

Commissioner Diana Finnegan said state agencies had found elevated concentrations of the raphidophyte Heterosigma at some sampling sites and that necropsies and coordinated testing were underway; she said results so far were inconclusive but that agencies were increasing targeted sampling. Finnegan added that multiple possible stressors are being evaluated and that the county should continue to press for comprehensive testing and cross-agency coordination.

Board members discussed a summer fertilizer restriction that has been adopted by other Florida localities and debated whether Citrus County should explore an expanded ordinance. Commissioner Finnegan suggested a workshop and more data collection before adopting a new punitive enforcement approach she described as potentially unenforceable without substantial staffing and monitoring resources. Commissioner Rebecca Bays suggested the city of Crystal River be consulted because the city has been working on water-quality monitoring projects for Kings Bay and might serve as a local test case.

Why it matters: Commissioners and residents said improved, transparent monitoring is needed to identify causes, guide mitigation (septic-to-sewer conversions, stormwater projects, nutrient reductions) and evaluate the effectiveness of investments such as eelgrass restoration and Safe Crystal River projects.

Ending: Commissioners requested staff follow up with state agencies and local partners to compile current monitoring data and to outline options for a workshop on fertilizer rules and water-quality monitoring. Several commissioners and public speakers asked that county staff report back with clear metrics the board can use to measure program success.","Public commenters and commissioners raised concerns about recent manatee and fish mortality and urged better monitoring, data and targeted responses; commissioners discussed whether a county-level fertilizer ordinance or local coordination with Crystal River should be pursued.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6276033,"County approves one-year lease with civic association despite split vote",181,2208000,2389000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9&start=2208&end=2389","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9/thumbnail_2208000.jpg","/articles/6276033/Citrus-County/Florida/County-approves-one-year-lease-with-civic-association-despite-split-vote","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6276033-c6beb0e5b50167b4f4a1b8e589dd458c/orig.mp4?Expires=1771151755&Signature=Qi7ZXV29N~bEDOJymvB8LpXNqvAdvpM1Nmxd3~ezs~pF5nv-jN9IbD2r~OMkDTbCdPxk85jAsv0sBV5SwtIMXg8O0MLNXAEX-6YXfKzpqQIIdlipP6nqzoqSXavI-yvRTJnVVncz-CVauaZTFGc7z68WZMi4wOjUp-7h2U1z0-ggy2-JfKQIH-8LcfhHBHNF4OS955vfdK-NUK~Mlac0n5i~TlmrTmDs8Tjom-fZ~x6TJ~iHY2UtVH107zQnySW0RZfcG0dLz4PtpAanz-obPuGw7pRZdUNLIhUjaSXnRdEDjOfL04~~LSSjwxl00o8LSbpm1zjvIVkJ3apbW2tbMg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Citrus County Board of County Commissioners on March 25 approved a one-year lease with the Citrus Springs Civic Association for use of a county-owned facility, voting 3-2 after commissioners raised concerns about operating costs.

Why it matters: Commissioners debated whether county management and overhead for the building are appropriate uses of limited county resources or whether the county should return the facility to the association to run directly.

Commission discussion centered on cost and operational responsibility. One commissioner said the county lacks full information on the building's overhead and preferred turning the facility back to the civic association rather than running maintenance, utilities and roof repairs. Another commissioner noted the civic association historically leaves the facility available to the county for disaster response and argued a one-year lease would increase building revenue and maintain emergency access.

A third commissioner said the lease is a short-term arrangement that can be revisited next year after the county completes a planned space-needs study and staff research on building costs; she supported the one-year term to preserve flexibility. After debate, the board voted 3-2 in favor of the one-year lease; the record shows the motion carried with three ayes and two nays.

Ending: The approved lease runs one year; commissioners asked staff for additional information on operating costs and for the forthcoming space-needs study before any longer-term commitment is considered.","After debate about maintenance costs and emergency use, the board approved a one-year lease with the Citrus Springs Civic Association for use of a county-owned building; motion passed 3-2.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6276038,"Commissioners approve 120-day letter of intent to seek funds for Pirates Cove purchase",1733,5917000,7650000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9&start=5917&end=7650","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9/thumbnail_5917000.jpg","/articles/6276038/Citrus-County/Florida/Commissioners-approve-120-day-letter-of-intent-to-seek-funds-for-Pirates-Cove-purchase","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6276038-78cbcb750437aa4f9b85fb7d7d16d7ba/orig.mp4?Expires=1771151755&Signature=kS0paPtJvx~f-D9aSnQRu-p8PDmpsFz4ph6PXGpYCcEwMDrZIhXthUudhZ1OS~kEprqdjBikPcCJ47I6hbNxLhnQVZ8IMnHCbnXPU8Y9f7lBUJs2fntmhpfQS04-1zxtPd0geGxLWnXupZfZeoT8mSuBBqbdKZA~PYpMk2uRbaXSSX4~L70wMi29sLLznLbQdLL0RGwEtV8d25CM~GX730QvmC09vasQijs9~BGaTsL0bKOseeaVLhUAvrExIvnFMojT6bIijBuMEqX~QDoQ7J3bTp~On7CIsaMg28iraLKIE6DwCR1VNigSopXhfTGZB~50KyhaU5jBAwdE-4f5tg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Citrus County Board of County Commissioners voted on March 25 to authorize a letter of intent that gives Commissioner Jeff Kennard up to 120 days to pursue private contributions to supplement a county offer for the Pirates Cove property.

Why it matters: Commissioners stressed competing county priorities — notably additional park capacity and youth sports fields — and debated whether park impact fees and other county funds should be used if private dollars do not materialize.

Commissioner Jeff Kennard, who moved for approval, said the letter of intent does not obligate the county to close and is intended only to buy time to solicit private support for a purchase the county previously offered $900,000 to acquire. \"All I'm asking for today is the opportunity to go ask them,\" Kennard said. He said any public money used would be limited to the $900,000 offer already on the table and that any additional amounts, including closing costs, would rely on private contributions.

Commissioners asked how the county would pay for both the Pirates Cove purchase and planned sports-field expansions. County staff provided park-impact-fee balances: about $2.2 million countywide in reserve and only small remaining balances in some district accounts. The record shows multiple potential sources were discussed including district park impact fees, countywide impact fees, and a Duke Natural Gas Special Projects fund described by the proponent as reserve money set aside when a different plant came online.

Board members split over prioritization. Commissioner Janet Barrick argued impact fees should be spent in growth areas that serve more residents year-round and voiced concern about using limited park funds for a property that floods at times. Commissioner Diana Finnegan and others emphasized the county collects impact fees specifically to expand park capacity, and Commissioner Holly Davis said she would support Kennard's effort to seek private funds.

County Attorney staff noted the draft letter of intent contained clerical errors and asked for authority to correct legal references before the chair signs; Chair Rebecca Bays said she would not sign substantively altered terms without returning to the board.

The motion to approve K1 A and B (letter of intent) passed 4-1. The county did not buy the property at the meeting; the vote authorized the letter of intent and the 120-day fundraising window. The board directed county legal staff to clean up document references before finalizing anything for signature.

Ending: Commissioner Kennard will pursue private fundraising and report back to the board. If the board receives a proposal that requires county funding beyond the previously stated $900,000 offer it will return for further approval.","The board voted to authorize a letter of intent giving Commissioner Jeff Kennard 120 days to seek private funding to supplement a county offer to acquire the Pirates Cove property; motion carried 4-1 after debate over impact-fee use and maintenance responsibilities.",{"_33":124,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":125,"_41":126,"_43":127,"_45":128,"_47":129,"_49":130,"_51":131,"_53":132,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":133,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":134,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6276042,"Citrus County hears PACE program update and SB 770 consumer protections",1594,2400000,3994000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9&start=2400&end=3994","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2767278-02d66498543f116c21172f4d986c69d9/thumbnail_2400000.jpg","/articles/6276042/Citrus-County/Florida/Citrus-County-hears-PACE-program-update-and-SB-770-consumer-protections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6276042-105f1e76a12e996fca043f7b642da36d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771151756&Signature=kumz13rADTyiJ2OAaDwW3TWxsRSRUHGUjt6moqWmg2tIwrzHNGWHVsKaZNJDyLWEhxfA4d0tF3N649tf1rNMt2J8XoYmwW8tivx18WrKO7ritmQh9g0VI6k~740Ag-4UwZ2yAhVczHEUcglt-Tz5o6NusT9re22sBA1o0RsOs3lPBVJVVWkMNHRRnwSymo1VVYEHiZ2nUffpEjXm3OQXRhQCVZGPi5THEwIDM8luOpJDG5a3A2S4ensJvv2qGYWvXEYIfxN8jr~zd-NfGVHY5IFLvbf05IxPQJ1eSN6OhJ8Q6QvdSpq1LvFVthsGpv5E-ffSwkvqi1C0qrlQMkG0bw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioner Rebecca Bays and the Citrus County Board of County Commissioners on March 25 heard a detailed presentation about Property Assessed Clean Energy, or PACE, financing and how recent state law changes affect how companies offer assessments tied to property tax bills.

The presentation explained that PACE is a voluntary financing option for property owners to fund home improvements such as roofing, impact windows and doors, and high-efficiency HVAC systems. Ryan (HomeRun), a HomeRun representative, and Chris (Fortify), a Fortify representative, and other PACE providers told the board the program attaches a fixed, amortizing special assessment to the tax bill and that the assessment is tied to the property rather than the owner's credit.

Why it matters: PACE financing has been offered in Florida and other states for years, but SB 770 and related changes have added underwriting and consumer-protection requirements that local governments and financers must follow. Commissioners asked about contractor oversight, pricing, income verification and how assessments affect future refinances or sales.

Officials said the major consumer-protection changes set by SB 770 include a 20-year maximum term for financing, a cap that the assessment cannot exceed 20% of the property's just value as set by the property appraiser, and a residential annual-payment limit of 10% of household income. Presenters described other statutory limits: no negative amortization, no balloon payments and no prepayment penalties in financed agreements. The presenters also described a mandatory \"confirmation-of-terms\" call, identity verification (Onfido-style selfie/ID checks), and a requirement that contractors be registered and vetted before work begins.

\"This is an option, a voluntary option,\" said Chris (Fortify representative). \"It is repaid on the tax bill, as a special assessment, and is treated just like any other local public-benefit assessment.\" He added that providers withhold payment to contractors until a certificate of completion is signed by the homeowner and contractor.

Commissioner Holly Davis and other board members asked how PACE providers verify that a contractor's price is reasonable. Ryan (HomeRun) said companies use internal pricing guidelines and will ask for additional documentation (invoices, photos) if a price is outside normal ranges; he said projects have been declined when they exceed guidelines. Fortify added that confirmed-terms calls often surface contractor misrepresentations and give the homeowner a final chance to cancel before funding.

Presenters summarized interest-rate mechanics and refinancing: PACE rates are fixed for each contract and tied to the bond market; the panel cited recent pricing in the 8.4% to 8.9% range and said homeowners can refinance if rates decline. They also noted the practical interaction with conventional mortgage markets: many mortgage buyers such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac will not accept a new first mortgage on a property that has an outstanding PACE assessment, meaning typical refinances will require the assessment be paid off at closing unless a lender elects to hold the loan on its own balance sheet.

Presenters described eligible improvements under SB 770 that were added or clarified: septic-to-sewer connections, septic replacements, flood and water-damage mitigation, backup generators, energy-efficient pool pumps and certain solar projects, in addition to roofing, windows, doors and HVAC.

The providers said they run dispute-resolution processes and cited internal compliance metrics: in their experience most contractor/homeowner disputes are resolved within 30 days and funds are released only after homeowner sign-off. They also pointed to research that they say shows low foreclosure incidence for properties with PACE assessments and, in some studies, positive effects on property values.

Board reaction and next steps: Commissioners asked for more written information on local implementation details, contractor registration rules and any county-level options to restrict or specify what improvements may be offered under a county program. Several commissioners said they value the program as an option for homeowners who cannot access traditional financing and for resilience work; others pressed for clarity on consumer protections and impacts on future mortgage financing.

The presentation was informational; no county action on adopting or changing a PACE program was taken at the meeting. Presenters said they are available to provide further documentation and to work with county staff on any local registration or oversight steps.

Ending: County staff and PACE providers will supply requested written materials to the board; commissioners signaled interest in follow-up briefings before making any county-level policy or registration decisions.

","County commissioners received an informational briefing on Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing, including changes codified by Florida's SB 770 that limit assessments, require underwriting and impose new consumer protections.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Citrus County Board actions March 25, 2025

Former Citrus County firefighter describes health crisis, disputes workers' compensation and benefit denials

Residents and commissioners press for clearer water-quality monitoring after manatee, fish deaths

County approves one-year lease with civic association despite split vote

Commissioners approve 120-day letter of intent to seek funds for Pirates Cove purchase

Citrus County hears PACE program update and SB 770 consumer protections