[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6105984,"mediaKeyId","2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe","parentId",2785111,"title","Pacifica receives mid‑program evaluation of Temporary Safe Parking Program; evaluators report 27% returned to housing","audioSeconds",348,"startMs",3284000,"endMs",3632000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe&start=3284&end=3632","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe/thumbnail_3284000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6105984/Pacifica/San-Mateo-County/California/Pacifica-receives-midprogram-evaluation-of-Temporary-Safe-Parking-Program-evaluators-report-27-returned-to-housing","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6105984-2f304a53845f59125318786f749a6010/orig.mp4?Expires=1771156781&Signature=mwtxIm76-DGX25kKCopBnN9S7wnSCqzSDWRFMQx7-RAiYShekmkyen3sQywt6MkNliK6arfzNpUvAamwfqxPL-kvZ3N7QVXzN3HIgLputhKAgs06KPTPe535vOCLIcBFJpzKQPOtFb3OmtKrSGk5k1VmZrIqVzpvy3tMkn1ZpaJ0EV6ZQLlvdfC2wCcKAzgs77niqXVDcUKWcsnKrgDWwGxwYuCQfUeVc4FUjxJ-mq40tMrNu5FdBgjh4vXDD2IrRhjvI2HEEiBQ8ooxGwI4iFWvvSfYpETeTML5e3tULElZu5Dru~pz1vdFR5BKHE9TfadjEA-IuAAjzZJXSFP5AA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of Pacifica CA","date","2025-03-27T01:57:23.517Z","article","City staff and the Pacifica Resource Center presented a midpoint evaluation of the city’s Temporary Safe Parking Program on March 24, reporting measurable housing outcomes and operational lessons as the council considers additional funding and an expansion into an off‑street lot at the SFRV Resort.

Pacifica Resource Center Executive Director Anita Reese said the program began under a settlement that envisioned 13 spaces; the program initially used eight on‑street spaces and later added a ninth space at the SFRV Resort when Water District construction displaced a prior location. Learning for Action completed the evaluation in September 2024. At the time of that report, nine people representing six households had returned to permanent housing; 85 percent of participants had developed housing plans, 82 percent received housing case management, about 21 percent received motorhome repairs, and 27 percent had moved into housing — an outcome the presenter described as favorable compared with similar programs in other Bay Area cities.

Reese told council that providing a stable place to park reduced participant stress and allowed staff to concentrate on housing plans. Program services included gray‑ and black‑water disposal, potable water access (added in April 2024), repairs, grocery and gas support, showers and referrals including mental‑health support. Staff said these services reduced illegal dumping and helped lower neighborhood complaints over time. Reese described operational refinements adopted after early implementation: shortening rotation to 28 days to stabilize move days, beginning housing case management earlier in enrollment, and improving transparency on steps toward affordable housing.

The city manager, Kevin Woodhouse, said the council would consider funding to continue and expand the program using off‑street spaces at the SFRV Resort and noted the program has relied on PRC coordination and city support for disposal and water access. No formal council action on additional funding appears in the provided transcript segment; the presentation and mid‑evaluation were followed by council questions and a request for follow‑up information.

Participants and PRC staff recommended a permanent, secure site to reduce turnover and simplify participation, clearer communication about program expectations and affordable‑housing pathways, and continued case management through and beyond the temporary program to keep individual exits to housing on track.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","PCC 3/24/25 Part 1 - Pacifica City Council Meeting - March 24, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Pacifica staff and the Pacifica Resource Center presented a two‑year evaluation of the Temporary Safe Parking Program (PSPP/TSPP). The report found case management and basic services helped participants develop housing plans; staff proposed expanding the program using off‑street spaces at the SFRV Resort.","taxTitle","Pacifica, San Mateo County, California","taxId",54263,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6105989,"Pacifica council authorizes state grant application for Beach Boulevard resiliency design; would require $1.25M local match if awarded",1831,2745000,4576000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe&start=2745&end=4576","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe/thumbnail_2745000.jpg","/articles/6105989/Pacifica/San-Mateo-County/California/Pacifica-council-authorizes-state-grant-application-for-Beach-Boulevard-resiliency-design-would-require-125M-local-match-if-awarded","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6105989-4c66dc7f599b943a001e3dd359504b40/orig.mp4?Expires=1771156781&Signature=NM7BLwdyOV3sMtSLQCR27Jd1UwWsCPvo98RNfD-c~N10v-nnTsKaf92vwf1M1wvfDJ8l9iXtM~Wnvk-Asfa5R0PpN-CbD19O9vctH3HsumdmDfv3~c7F4aMIucUQJze84c1pIXbWy5cRms1nY1y~XegMycXgL-UU-WAv7Fi6Ra-pi5M6XksVG~jNM0-HLIxGlcX-PIyJ6Prw8tv2iSvn0x-NRkYu05mYSstEy-5CgXvU3DV9GZMF5Rqr3Pae6vrZ~4XTUDqbcNHqHNzQgBVZGIkUNHTU-J9c-2OThn6sxRQccLQvZ9ke6d6AmhlD3yuFM~2LpL8v5WSHm~6twH6W0Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Pacifica City Council on March 24 approved a resolution authorizing staff to submit a $2.5 million grant application to the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) to fund phase 2C of the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency (BBIRB) project. The resolution passed unanimously.

Deputy Director Roland Yip briefed council that the BBIRB is a city‑led, multi‑phase effort to protect the Beach Boulevard corridor in the historic West Sharp Park neighborhood. The planned hybrid approach combines a seawall, rock scour apron and beach nourishment. Phase 2A — the 35 percent preliminary design — is underway; phase 2B (environmental work) is the subject of a separate pending grant application. Phase 2C, the subject of the DBW application, would fund permitting and completion of 100 percent plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) and securing regulatory permits.

Staff said the DBW grant requires a 50 percent local match; for a $2.5 million award the city’s share would be $1,250,000. The staff report stated the matching funds would come from the city’s disaster accounting fund if the grant is awarded and the city signs the grant agreement. City staff explained that the city does not obligate those funds until it signs the agreement; the council voted to submit the application.

Council members and public speakers asked detailed questions and raised concerns about long‑term strategy and use of disaster funds. Several residents urged planning for managed retreat and inland relocation of utilities rather than continued hard armoring at the shoreline. Speakers asked for clearer lifecycle cost estimates, the projected lifespan of seawalls, and the cost of alternatives such as relocating sewer infrastructure. Staff answered that the environmental review (EIR) and permitting work — particularly the EIR in phase 2B — will include study of impacts, that the Coastal Commission has been engaged in several meetings, and that the full permitting review would occur in phase 2C once 100 percent plans are prepared.

Motion to approve the resolution was made by Councilmember Wright and seconded by Mayor Beckmeyer. The motion passed unanimously. Staff said the city will return to council with updates as environmental review and permitting progress and before any funds are expended.","Council voted unanimously to authorize a $2.5 million grant application to the California Division of Boating and Waterways for phase 2C of the Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project; staff said a 50% local match of $1.25 million would come from the disaster accounting fund if the grant is accepted and the agreement signed.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6105994,"Pacifica approves street-repaving award to Pavement Coatings amid resident complaints over past work and cleanup",1169,438000,1607000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe&start=438&end=1607","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2785111-2b555236af9744223bb7f67d0c6941fe/thumbnail_438000.jpg","/articles/6105994/Pacifica/San-Mateo-County/California/Pacifica-approves-street-repaving-award-to-Pavement-Coatings-amid-resident-complaints-over-past-work-and-cleanup","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6105994-2b2b42ff9ef646b88c147cf6b53c411e/orig.mp4?Expires=1771156781&Signature=T~d0vlZtKo-qLx~oVKIX48K3Z5eChHZ0~qCjUkHJFEkMMvghwOWXnkorRDbTX8tSrluA8z3563rwtbUP-k1S7NGBR~fkDpnhM~iNV7S58yvRexSXblJYx0XcPYwoD4Dd3fG3D5OV785epCZ5GpuYypJeUPrVGpHxyLzzWSUR15w6H2P2N8oAyDEI5RYEpPGf7VUK~Yv-V7lDGMe1Dn5TCwpXFs05ldkjn2FRexjCeW~Sfb4Ih5-2R5WW9X2twljO8XYThaScojB6tXU7Sd-2uekzU6RreRGNI2yK6-3sZY6LhZkGzdO8DntL6F43cPsbht~wUvLFcbw-WNGpJeKllg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Pacifica City Council approved the consent calendar March 24, which included the recommended award of the city’s street-repaving contract to Pavement Coatings, after council and staff answered multiple questions about quality control, cleanup and contractor selection.

Deputy Director of Public Works and City Engineer Roland Yip told council that the city will assign roughly one to one-and-a-half full‑time inspection staff to monitor the project and require specified materials and compaction. The treatment planned this year is a rubber cape seal, a two‑layer surface treatment consisting of a chip seal followed by a slurry seal; where full asphalt replacement is needed crews will remove and replace approximately three inches of asphalt before applying the cape seal. Yip said hot mix must be placed above about 175 degrees and compaction will be verified in the field.

Yip described two liquidated‑damage provisions added since a prior project: a $1,000 per block per day penalty when crews post no‑parking signs but do not perform work, and a $500 penalty when contractors fail to hand‑deliver resident notices three days before work. He also said the city checks contractor forms for responsiveness and responsibility under the California Public Contracting Code and that prevailing wages are required and will be checked prior to payment.

Residents and public commenters urged extra safeguards. Suzanne Moore and other speakers noted repeated complaints about past work in Manor and other neighborhoods and suggested seeking additional bids. Kimberly Fanelli raised environmental concerns, saying aggregates coated in asphalt collected in gutters had the potential to reach storm drains and the ocean after previous projects. Several commenters recommended better timing and stronger guarantees on post‑paving cleanup; staff said the contractor provides street sweeping after slurry cures and that city sweepers may perform follow‑up rounds, but added additional cleanup specification would increase bid costs.

Councilmember questions focused on work quality, notification and rights when trees overhang the work area; Yip said contractors must follow the city’s tree ordinance, and pre‑construction meetings will cover trimming procedures. Yip also explained why one bidder was deemed non‑responsive: missing required references and subcontractor listings, and why Pavement Coatings’ submission — although it used a different subcontractor form — was judged responsive after review with the city attorney.

Action on the contract award was taken as part of the consent calendar vote. The consent calendar, as corrected, passed unanimously.

The repaving program is part of a multi‑year pavement maintenance plan staff said is intended to stretch limited funds; Yip said the cape seal treatment can extend surface life toward 15 years when applied to appropriate pavement‑condition sections, while full mill‑and‑overlay repaving is needed for heavily damaged streets. Residents asked staff to align the contract schedule with the city street‑sweeping contract and to consider targeted hand‑sweeping near storm drains; staff said they would review the sweep schedule overlap and can add specifications if council requests them.","The City Council approved the consent calendar that included awarding a street-repaving contract to Pavement Coatings. Staff described inspection, liquidated-damage and warranty measures; residents pressed for stronger cleanup, timing and environmental safeguards.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Pacifica receives mid‑program evaluation of Temporary Safe Parking Program; evaluators report 27% returned to housing

Pacifica council authorizes state grant application for Beach Boulevard resiliency design; would require $1.25M local match if awarded

Pacifica approves street-repaving award to Pavement Coatings amid resident complaints over past work and cleanup