Agoura Hills residents oppose residential development near Lady Face Mountain due to fire hazards

The Agoura Hills City Council meeting on March 26, 2025, focused on a proposed residential development near Lady Face Mountain, sparking significant community concern regarding fire safety and environmental impact.

During the meeting, residents voiced strong opposition to the project, citing the site's location within a very high fire hazard severity zone. Concerns were raised about the steep terrain and limited access, which could hinder evacuation efforts during emergencies. The only access point, Agora Road, was highlighted as a potential bottleneck that could affect not only future residents but also neighboring communities, including Cornell and Malibu.

Environmental impacts were also a major theme, with speakers emphasizing the potential harm to local wildlife habitats. The introduction of residential areas was seen as a threat to native species and vegetation, particularly during the summer months when water sources become scarce. Residents argued that the development would alter the rustic character of Agoura Hills and set a concerning precedent for future projects.

In contrast, the developer, represented by John Rauschle of Toll Brothers, defended the project, stating it would provide much-needed single-family housing options. Rauschle emphasized the importance of creating opportunities for families to remain in the community and expressed a willingness to collaborate with the city to address concerns.

City Council members discussed the proposal, noting the need for housing in Agoura Hills but also recognizing the importance of addressing fire safety and environmental issues. Some council members expressed skepticism about the project's contribution to affordable housing goals, particularly for low-income residents, and voiced concerns about relying on in-lieu fees for affordable housing.

The meeting concluded with the council requesting non-binding feedback on the proposed development, indicating that further discussions and evaluations would be necessary before any decisions are made. The outcome of this proposal remains uncertain as the city navigates the balance between development needs and community safety.