Big Rock Council examines temporary housing regulations and ADU access challenges

In the heart of Malibu's city hall, a spirited discussion unfolded during the Planning Commission's special meeting on February 20, 2025, focusing on the future of temporary housing and accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in the wake of recent fires. The atmosphere was charged with urgency as commissioners grappled with the implications of new municipal codes and safety regulations.

The conversation began with a critical examination of the current regulations surrounding temporary housing, particularly in areas like Big Rock, where access and safety are paramount. Drew, a commissioner, raised concerns about the lack of two-way access for temporary housing, which could prevent these structures from being converted into ADUs in the future. This point sparked a broader debate about the existing ADU ordinance, which, despite being approved by the City Council, remains in a state of uncertainty pending certification from the state’s Housing and Community Development (HCD) department.

Kellan, another commissioner, clarified that while the ADU ordinance is technically on the books, its effectiveness is still under review. This ambiguity raises questions for homeowners looking to navigate the complexities of temporary housing and potential future conversions. The commissioners expressed a desire for clearer policies to avoid confusion and legal issues for residents.

As the discussion progressed, the focus shifted to safety measures for temporary homes, particularly in light of the devastating fires that have impacted the community. The need for geotechnical reports was debated, with some commissioners advocating for these assessments only when structures are permanently affixed to foundations. The consensus leaned towards ensuring that any temporary housing, especially those on wheels, should be secured against extreme weather conditions, a precaution underscored by past incidents of mobile homes being displaced by strong winds.

The meeting also highlighted the emotional toll on residents who have lost their homes, with commissioners emphasizing the importance of providing viable housing solutions. Elizabeth, a commissioner, voiced concerns about the limitations imposed on victims seeking to rebuild, urging the council to consider the needs of those affected by the fires.

As the meeting drew to a close, the commissioners sought to establish a clearer path forward, proposing straw votes to gauge consensus on key issues. The discussions underscored a community grappling with the balance between safety, regulation, and the urgent need for housing solutions in the aftermath of disaster. The outcome of these deliberations will undoubtedly shape Malibu's approach to temporary housing and ADUs, reflecting the city's commitment to both safety and recovery.