Connecticut enacts restrictions on foreign property purchases near military installations

On March 27, 2025, the Connecticut State Legislature introduced House Bill 6735, a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating foreign ownership of real estate near military installations and agricultural land. The bill seeks to enhance national security by preventing foreign entities from acquiring property that could pose risks to military operations and local agriculture.

The key provisions of House Bill 6735 include a prohibition on foreign principals from owning or controlling interests in real property adjacent to military installations or agricultural land. Buyers of such properties must sign an affidavit confirming they are not foreign principals and that their purchase complies with the bill's stipulations. Additionally, if a foreign principal intends to buy property within a three-mile radius of a military installation, they must notify the Adjutant General at least thirty days prior to the purchase. The Adjutant General is then tasked with reviewing the proposed transaction and providing a recommendation within fifteen days.

The introduction of this bill has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders. Proponents argue that the legislation is crucial for safeguarding national security and protecting local agricultural interests from potential foreign influence. Critics, however, raise concerns about the implications for property rights and the potential for overreach in regulating real estate transactions.

Economically, the bill could impact property values and the real estate market in areas surrounding military installations, as potential buyers may be deterred by the added regulatory requirements. Socially, the legislation may foster a sense of security among residents living near military sites, while also raising questions about the balance between security and property rights.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications for Connecticut's real estate landscape and national security will continue to be closely monitored. Lawmakers will need to navigate the complexities of ensuring safety while addressing the concerns of property owners and potential investors. The outcome of House Bill 6735 could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, reflecting a growing trend of prioritizing national security in local governance.