On March 27, 2025, the Oregon State Legislature introduced House Bill 2342, a significant piece of legislation aimed at revising the structure and pricing of hunting and fishing licenses in the state. This bill seeks to address concerns regarding accessibility and affordability for residents, particularly targeting senior citizens, disabled veterans, and youth.
The main provisions of HB 2342 include adjustments to the pricing of various hunting and fishing licenses, with a focus on making these activities more financially accessible. For instance, the bill proposes a reduction in fees for resident senior hunting licenses and introduces free licenses for disabled veterans. Additionally, it aims to streamline the licensing process for youth aged 12 to 17, encouraging early engagement in outdoor activities.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Debate surrounding the bill has highlighted differing opinions on the implications of these changes. Proponents argue that lowering fees will promote outdoor participation and conservation efforts, while opponents express concerns about potential revenue losses for state wildlife programs, which rely heavily on license sales for funding. Amendments to the bill have been proposed to address these concerns, including provisions for maintaining funding levels through alternative revenue sources.
The economic implications of HB 2342 are noteworthy. By making hunting and fishing more accessible, the bill could stimulate local economies that depend on outdoor recreation, potentially increasing tourism and related business revenues. Socially, the bill aims to foster a greater appreciation for wildlife and conservation among younger generations, which could have long-term benefits for environmental stewardship.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress. If passed, HB 2342 could reshape the landscape of outdoor recreation in Oregon, making it more inclusive while balancing the financial needs of state wildlife management. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential revisions as lawmakers seek to address the concerns raised during initial debates.