Nevada Assembly hears passionate support and opposition for AB 245 gun control bill

In a pivotal joint meeting of the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees on March 27, 2025, lawmakers discussed Assembly Bill 245, which seeks to raise the minimum age for the possession and purchase of semi-automatic rifles and shotguns from 18 to 21. This proposed legislation has sparked significant debate, reflecting deep divisions within the community regarding gun safety and Second Amendment rights.

Supporters of AB 245, including gun violence survivors and advocates from organizations like Moms Demand Action, emphasized the urgent need to address preventable gun violence, particularly among young people. They highlighted alarming statistics showing that individuals aged 18 to 20 commit gun homicides at rates more than three times greater than those 21 and older. Testimonies from supporters underscored the bill's potential to reduce access to firearms for vulnerable populations and prevent mass shootings, citing tragic incidents such as the Gilroy Garlic Festival shooting, where a young gunman legally purchased a firearm.

Conversely, opponents of the bill argued that it infringes upon the constitutional rights of young adults. Many expressed concerns that raising the age limit would not effectively address the root causes of gun violence and could criminalize responsible young gun owners. Testimonies from various stakeholders, including law enforcement representatives and firearm instructors, pointed out that young adults are already trusted to serve in the military and should similarly be allowed to exercise their rights to bear arms.

The meeting also featured discussions on the implications of recent court rulings, including a Ninth Circuit decision that found similar age restrictions unconstitutional. Critics of AB 245 argued that such legal precedents should guide legislative decisions, cautioning against measures that could be deemed unconstitutional.

As the committee continues to deliberate, the outcome of AB 245 remains uncertain, with advocates on both sides passionately defending their positions. The discussions reflect broader societal concerns about gun violence, public safety, and the balance between individual rights and community protection. The next steps for the bill will be closely watched as lawmakers weigh the potential impacts on Nevada's youth and public safety.