[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6621314,"mediaKeyId","2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f","parentId",2803161,"title","Committee reviews complex amendment on hospital and school district boundary transfers affecting Big Sky and Ennis","audioSeconds",1773,"startMs",7260000,"endMs",9033000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f&start=7260&end=9033","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f/thumbnail_7260000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6621314/Montana/Committee-reviews-complex-amendment-on-hospital-and-school-district-boundary-transfers-affecting-Big-Sky-and-Ennis","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6621314-f98b362d453d908d0acf720dea081fef/orig.mp4?Expires=1775827022&Signature=C~-FW1KcCWetSe7qzFhCp0V9o-H-Ldev~-66664y96U8R9Y8DvhfHfuHmFnlU5LZC~Q5URpgBpgh-rc4e74Mwh4fIiRweudHRRFuJKr0nDYuQWd68pVGPk981-Juk~QoWHUZX2Ue0wqXe3e0Iv1VS2Boo3e03td-1iMa2QBxjGy7~92nPUAlLw9zZxEqSlBdzgS3kCsWNFlWMPQUHcPkux7kwd~DCbWKBQ5Fqu1GMXi3o87xTvIZWqtpnn5TOIcO0uC~HTsPH6kEzc6zOtivsI6x9236a6bJjXi7WwE8nkMlxwCJ3Hh7whqXWOGcnj6jE2ElqzZm30AQIfabyoTNng__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Montana Legislature","date","2025-03-27T00:00:00Z","article","HELENA, Mont.

A lengthy work-session discussion on March 27 focused on proposed amendments to Senate Bill 260 that change how territory transfers between hospital and school districts would be handled. The amendment's authors said the changes are intended to reduce abrupt fiscal impacts on districts that lose taxable value and to create a procedure for school-district reconciliation payments where isolated pupils attend a different district. The changes were discussed as a response to a local dispute between Big Sky and Madison/Ennis-area jurisdictions.

Jesse Luther of the Big Sky Resort Area District presented a walkthrough of the amendment. Key features include new definitions (hospital district, school district, \"unable to access on-site services\"), a tightened qualified-petitioner definition limited to individuals who own real property in the affected territory (corporate petitioners were removed), and a new process that phases transfers of taxable value in equal thirds over three years instead of an immediate full transfer. \"In the first year after the voters approve it, one third of the taxable value would be shifted,\" Luther explained. \"The second year, a second third would be shifted. And then in the third year, the third third would be shifted.\"

For school districts the amendment adds a reconciliation-payment mechanism for the school district of attendance when isolated pupils (students who cannot reasonably access the resident district's on-site services within a 60-minute drive) attend another district. The amendment sets qualifying thresholds so that a resident school district must exceed certain taxable-value levels before reconciliation payments apply; the draft cited a $100 million taxable-value threshold and a criterion relative to per-A and B property ratios to prevent small districts from being required to make large payments. The amendment directs petitions for reconciliation to the county superintendent (with a 30-day review), allows an appeal to district court, and requires certain mill-levy calculations to be applied across the resident district so the reconciliation payment is funded from a district-wide mill increase.

Amendment sponsors emphasized protections for taxpayers and school budgets: if territory transfers and an area had previously been making reconciliation payments in the other direction, the amendment provides for a three-year \"step down\" reverse payment to reduce abrupt loss of revenue to the prior district. The amendment also states that any bonded indebtedness incurred before the petition filing date remains the obligation of the taxpayers in the transferred territory until the bonds are retired.

Committee members asked detailed questions. Senator Fern and others said the three-year step-down reduces the potential shock of losing a tax base, but raised questions about incentives: what motivates a district to allow a taxable base to move? Sponsors said the amendment is designed to be broadly applicable so that other districts could use the mechanism in the future if similar geographic or access issues arise. Committee members and staff also discussed timelines for executive action and the need for additional stakeholder negotiation.

The amendment includes an applicability date limiting the school-district provisions to school years beginning on or after July 1, 2025, and a severability clause. Sponsors said the school-administration professional organizations were consulted and that concerns about constitutionality were addressed by making the reconciliation and advisory provisions broadly applicable rather than ad-hoc for a single district. The committee did not take executive action in the work session; sponsors asked for additional time to finalize details.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate Taxation - Mar 27, 2025 09:00 - 13:00","oneSentenceSummary","An amendment to Senate Bill 260 would phase transfers of taxable value between hospital districts over three years and create a reconciliation payment process for school districts when isolated pupils attend another district, aiming to reduce abrupt fiscal shocks to losing districts.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature MT, Montana","taxId",77694,"location","Montana","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6621319,"Bill aims to clear title issues for manufactured homes to enable mortgage financing",788,6408000,7196000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f&start=6408&end=7196","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f/thumbnail_6408000.jpg","/articles/6621319/Montana/Bill-aims-to-clear-title-issues-for-manufactured-homes-to-enable-mortgage-financing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6621319-26c2c87e8f7af924a38c9078c13e0d7e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775827022&Signature=kkOLuVew9fJ-uCayDh8k~AXUBWZZAzbXx-eTZU4Eje7mpt5LjH6HmWAd1ZYbr18LP9cNsZMGmzXuZpIYpL4DF5Upcj5Kxs8rIuOESHClNdiikmV7ktOhzWBCSYUFd1hdXPQqZ6P-o2vzYd4EhKgOGzM3LQNJg5Yd~j5jn97rShhTho38VRZLaZbI7AnyQ89bfRVH22ok4lhcGW9cZeSGXGDfH53x5NryJDF3NxhnF8FAAv8aJWoR3a2nUNGU3-P1oDyNWv8VGqCEoYdJWIL~-yn8QbfSQjNJ~zyhzon9Sqblb0bipbiNvdVhTeKbUOlMr8AOVTWnIzsBORYhW-A9yA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","HELENA, Mont.

House Bill 785, presented to the Senate Taxation Committee on March 27, would create a process for owners of owner-occupied manufactured homes to convert property from personal chattel into real property when owners cannot locate vehicle-style titles or registration tags. Supporters said the change will allow owners to obtain conventional mortgage financing and improve resale prospects.

Representative Terry Falk (House District 10) opened the bill by explaining that the law already permits conversion of a manufactured home affixed to a permanent foundation into real property, but that some long-standing homes lack the tags, titles or paperwork needed to process the conversion. \"This bill attempts to fix that,\" Falk said. He described the situation as rare but consequential for individual homeowners who otherwise face limited financing options and higher interest rates.

John Sinrude and Stuart Doggett, representing title and land-title industry groups, testified in support and said they had worked on the bill language to ensure title insurers can provide an Alt-7 endorsement where appropriate. Sinrude said the process would include a slightly different affidavit and that title insurers had agreed in principle to issue coverage if the statutory process is followed and the property meets conversion standards (permanent foundation, removal of axles/tongue, engineering where HUD requires).

Witnesses and sponsor described the practical benefits: converting to real property can lower down payments required by lenders, allow use of standard mortgage products and qualify buyers for established down-payment assistance programs. Committee members asked clarifying questions about foundations that meet HUD or FHA standards; Sinrude and other witnesses explained that approved approaches include engineered pier and foundation systems, concrete footings tied to the home frame or other HUD-approved attachments and engineer stamps where needed for Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac financing.

No opponents or informational witnesses recorded opposition during the committee hearing; an informational Department of Revenue witness was present for technical questions. Representative Falk asked that the committee note the bill had unanimous support in House readings and asked for committee consideration. The hearing closed with the sponsor available for follow-up.","House Bill 785 would allow a process to convert titling-deficient manufactured homes into real property to improve financing access; sponsor and title-industry witnesses said the change helps owners without tags or original paperwork, while no opponents were recorded at the hearing.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6621323,"Senate committee hears broad three-part childcare tax credit package",2845,3158000,6003000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f&start=3158&end=6003","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f/thumbnail_3158000.jpg","/articles/6621323/Montana/Senate-committee-hears-broad-three-part-childcare-tax-credit-package","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6621323-4eccd0557e3ef9289c97130b37a1e141/orig.mp4?Expires=1775827022&Signature=Ld1BfJcryfTNcARIafzcMyBTmj04qaDVxzOIEnfSFbGbR7qlOvEFiyWOXIrFlCpOAfjsNXR-91swf3v~GFpTdT1HwOSDq~Qb5-51753EAnPMSWumTlimBLM0CjO-6ywd6hrhG0-cTmACyREZwcyOLdLy1d8RxQv0JKI2nccg4a62N2l9IqICpKSwj5wkpJzHJ7F3c4GPhx98-WziGOQbra79TB-0Vgpa4CWcvpYoR9ZfiA71juDRcxHQ5srxm3PjoBSn8CglQ9G4bbDfhsm96D1qHbAGQZ1INkkN1iG25K0igdXDL1vNsk4i137ptCqn1Kjfq0WRt4AYvHu5t7X8fw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","HELENA, Mont.

A bipartisan package of tax credits aimed at easing child care costs and stabilizing the state's childcare workforce drew wide support in the Senate Taxation Committee on March 27, with employers, early-childhood advocates, pediatricians and chambers of commerce urging passage. Opponents, including certified public accountants and taxpayer groups, urged the Legislature to consider direct grants and to weigh how restoring refundable credits fits in the state's larger tax-simplification work.

Senate Bill 321, sponsored in the hearing by Senator Josh Kasmier (Senate District 13), proposes three major elements: a refundable child tax credit to provide direct family support; a tax credit to raise compensation or otherwise support the childcare workforce; and an employer tax credit to encourage businesses to provide or subsidize child care for employees. Caitlin Jensen of 0 to 5 Montana described the package as \"a three-pronged tax credit proposal with strong bipartisan support designed to address the critical barriers of childcare access, affordability, and family economic security.\" She summarized the child credit as $1,200 per qualifying child with a phase-out to avoid an abrupt cliff.

Proponents stressed the economic and workforce effects of limited child care. Sheridan Hoyer of the Montana Chamber of Commerce cited national estimates of employer losses due to child-care disruptions and urged that employer incentives are part of a public-private solution. Employer witnesses described direct experience: Dustin Bretz of Bretz RV and Marine described opening employer-run child care to recruit and retain employees in low-unemployment markets, noting the facility improved hiring and retention and that his company invested significant capital to provide slots for employees' children. Hallie Bretz, who attended the employer-run program as a child, testified as a witness in support and described educational advantages.

Health and child-development voices supported the investment. Dr. Lauren Wilson, representing the Montana chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said early-childhood investments improve long-term health and social outcomes. Cindy Cisneros of the Committee for Economic Development provided national research showing childcare's economic effects; she said the Montana-specific finding was an approximate $397 million economic impact related to childcare activity.

Opponents urged caution about choosing tax credits over direct grants. John Iverson, for the Montana Society of CPAs, said his group is not opposed to aiding families or providers but warned that returning to a proliferation of income tax credits undermines the 2021 tax-simplification reforms and can circumvent explicit budgeting that direct appropriations require. Bob Story of the Montana Taxpayers Association recommended earlier statutory review cycles for large new credits.

Committee members questioned eligibility interactions between the proposed child tax credit and the state's Best Beginnings scholarship program, workforce targeting, and whether employer credits should be targeted by business size. Witnesses said scholarship and tax-credit programs could overlap depending on income eligibility, and proponents said employer credits are intentionally flexible to allow on-site care, cooperative employer arrangements, tuition subsidies or employee-dependent-care benefits.

No committee vote was recorded during the hearing. Sponsor Senator Kasmier closed by asking for support, saying the bill would invest in children, working families and employers; proponents and informational witnesses said the package is one available approach among several to improve childcare access and stabilize the workforce.","Senate Bill 321 would create a refundable child tax credit, a workforce tax credit for childcare workers and an employer-dependent-care tax credit; proponents argued it addresses affordability and workforce shortages while opponents urged caution about tax-credit design and budget transparency.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6621329,"Senate panel hears push to raise business equipment tax exemption to $3 million",2132,959000,3091000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f&start=959&end=3091","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2803161-abde0e0d8fca2965fa2b979a5ba3cd2f/thumbnail_959000.jpg","/articles/6621329/Montana/Senate-panel-hears-push-to-raise-business-equipment-tax-exemption-to-3-million","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6621329-c711696a63f107dd3f20ff61c1e98def/orig.mp4?Expires=1775827022&Signature=c5RkdeWdhkmWldH7fknmxI78HQanru09bbH5o3vEb4Km9EPlCeZlW4qkjnM4SaxJmmTRpaGl3t73j3~AngHg8CvqOTldi0IfUQWiOr9Fl72KSPLVlpS0oB0mG93R1OnSX9-n1JtIBTwqSO-XGIpWCQM7DaxqCn3qZaeC4WwZoEH9167E~nDy69V6mDu2O0qfv1XfErMd6zMfhLdIZDJuvnV4kD0ZKKeegfzkMaXN5nGdpHY8IpYTn911QqJ6~Q8nBdJZSniPCqPXF9sPdO5qtc6JGMmM8DjX5UYOq5-Ey7UIzT5067wrLhOWgTokX2kMTjtkBVWRy3D4t3eI2Y8UtA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","HELENA, Mont.

Supporters of an increase in Montana's business equipment tax exemption urged the Senate Taxation Committee on March 27 to approve Senate Bill 322, saying the change would relieve small businesses, farms and other equipment-intensive operators from an onerous, hard-to-administer property tax. Opponents told the committee the proposal would shift tax burden to homeowners and school districts and increase reliance on the state general fund.

Proponents said rising equipment costs make the current $1 million exemption obsolete. \"Increasing this from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 will take another, I think it's about 300,\" said Bridal Beatty, director of the Montana Department of Revenue, adding the change would remove most small businesses and farms from the rolls and simplify reporting. John Semple of the Montana Grain Growers Association and other industry witnesses described modern farm machinery prices that can put a single combine at roughly $1 million and other implements in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Supporters included the Montana Department of Revenue, Montana Grain Growers Association, Montana Taxpayers Association, Montana Economic Developers Association, Montana Stockgrowers Association, Montana Chamber of Commerce, Montana Building Industry Association, Montana Coal Council, Montana Agricultural Business Association and Montana Mining Association. Witnesses told the committee the bill would likely spur investment and job growth by leaving more capital in the hands of employers. \"The more money we can put in the employer's pocket, the more money they will invest in their equipment,\" Beatty said.

Opponents said the fiscal trade-offs are significant. Rose Bender of the Montana Budget & Policy Center traced decades of prior reductions to the business equipment tax and said the policy has already sharply reduced the number of businesses paying the tax. She told the committee the bill does not provide a direct reimbursement mechanism for school districts and would shift property tax burden to residential homeowners and other property classes. \"School districts will adjust upward as a result, shifting property taxes to other classes,\" Bender said.

Dylan Cole and Bryce Kotz of the Department of Revenue answered committee questions about the fiscal note and implementation. Cole explained that the fiscal note projects a statewide drop in taxable value that translates to roughly a 0.35 percentage point change in taxable value on average and observed that the entitlement-share backfill to local governments would be a static dollar amount rather than a growing reimbursement. He said schools are handled differently under current law and that the guaranteed tax base (GTB) mechanism that subsidizes school mills is effectively at its practical limit in many places.

Committee members pressed witnesses on reporting requirements under a higher exemption threshold. Bryce Kotz said the Department of Revenue can discontinue reporting for taxpayers clearly under the threshold and will reestablish accounts if taxpayers later exceed it. Senator Josh Casimir, sponsor of SB 322, argued the change is a targeted way to help small businesses and farms and urged committee support.

The hearing included numerous local and statewide business organizations, county chambers of commerce and industry trade groups. No formal committee vote was recorded during the hearing.

Questions and public testimony highlighted the competing policy priorities: cutting costs for businesses that invest in expensive equipment versus protecting school funding and avoiding unintended tax shifts to homeowners. The committee will consider the bill and its fiscal implications in subsequent steps of the session.","Supporters told the Senate Taxation Committee that raising Montana's business equipment tax exemption from $1 million to $3 million will ease burdens on small businesses and farms; opponents warned the change would shift costs to homeowners and school districts and increase general fund obligations.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Committee reviews complex amendment on hospital and school district boundary transfers affecting Big Sky and Ennis

Bill aims to clear title issues for manufactured homes to enable mortgage financing

Senate committee hears broad three-part childcare tax credit package

Senate panel hears push to raise business equipment tax exemption to $3 million